User talk:Pedia Master Mind

December 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Apostasy in Islam has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Apostasy in Islam was changed by Pedia Master Mind (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952328 on 2015-12-02T10:00:26+00:00.


 * Pedia Master Mind, please explain your case for your edits on the Apostasy in Islam talk page replying to questions raised here --BoogaLouie (talk) 00:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Film industry. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

December 5, 2015
Hi Iryna Harpy, the edits which i have made on Film industry page are from reliable and correct source. I have made a Turkey film industry section too, which is absolutely from a correct source i.e European Audiovisual Observatory. As you can see that the second table on film industry page which is the table of No. of admission by country, is also from European Audiovisual Observatory and it is from book which is not free to read, so I can't check that second table but I didn't remove it. Now my posting of a new section i.e Turkish film industry section is from European Audiovisual Observatory's Book just like the source of second table, but this turkish film industry source book is free to read. So you can read it and check each and every word of my edit. So Please don't undo my edits without confirming the falseness of them. Hope you understand and we work in future for better Wiki. Thanks --Pedia Master Mind (talk) 09:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Please bear in mind that I am not trying to work against you and am assuming good faith on your behalf. The content in question needs to be addressed at the correct venue, being the article's talk page, where I've already left a comment. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)