User talk:Pedroelbanquero

October 2020
Hello, I'm Sportzpikachu. I noticed that you recently removed content from RSA (cryptosystem) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ―Sportzpikachu  my talk contribs  07:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at RSA (cryptosystem) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. D.Lazard (talk) 09:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring answer
Im trying to understand what you want to pùblish, now i remove the original content from github, i understand you just want publications by third parties

Now you say the paper is not good, is the reason because i was publishing on github before, because exploit db not update since weaks ago. Is valid if some university publish from there ?
 * Please read WP:Five pillars and WP:What Wikipedia is not. In summary, for being cited in Wikipedia, a mathematical result must be regularly published in a peer reviewed journal; it must also be notable, that is it must having been discussed by independent WP:secondary sources. Clearly the result that you want to add the RSA (cryptosystem) does not satisfy any of these criteria. These is the fundamental reason for which several different editors have reverted your edits.
 * Also, do not forget to sign your posts on talk page with four tildes ( ~ ). D.Lazard (talk) 13:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)