User talk:PeeJay/Archive 25

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Re: Messi's Honours
Hi, just wanted to let you know that apparently the discussion on Messi's honours has finally been closed and a consensus was achieved, so now that issue should finally be cleared up, which is a relief, and should make these situations far easier to deal with in the future! Best, Messirulez (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Lineup graphic
Hey, I'm currently working up the classic 1998 play-off final between Charlton and Sunderland, and I wondered if you would be able to knock me up a starting lineup graphic like you have on the 1999 FA Cup Final article, i.e. File:Man Utd vs Newcastle 1999-05-22.svg? I have a Guardian source saying both teams lined up as 4-4-2, so it should be quite straight forward if you still have the source for the one you did already? If not, no worries. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 11:05, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Alexis Sánchez or just Alexis
Hi. I have no personal opinion, only using what other editors have settled on in his article, and in his native language article (Alexis Sánchez). Both say a variation of using the single name Alexis. I also checked the standalone use of his combined name (9 occurrences) vs solo Sánchez (53 occurrences) vs solo Alexis (a majority, 97 occurrences), in the body of his es.wiki article. Judging by the style of your edit summary on the revert ("he's not really mononymous though, is he?"), is there reason to believe that his personal articles are wrong? If they are wrong, perhaps the heading of his articles, in both languages, should be adjusted to say "is sometimes (or occasionally?) referred to by just Alexis"? Looking back now through the history of the article, it had long periods with "sometimes known simply as Alexis", adjusted to a long period of "known as Alexis Sánchez or simply Alexis", then "known simply as Alexis" since June 2016. Is there a definitive answer, before going MOS:SURNAME in his article? Hope you can help. Jmg38 (talk) 10:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Mario Gomez
Hi, this "special contributor" vandalised article of Mario Gomez with his edit on 29 June 2020. Could you kinldy fix it, please? Thank you in advance. Isik (talk) 10:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Paul Scholes
What on earth is your problem I notice you always seem to delete comment regarding Scholes being 'one of the greatest players of his generation'. You are clearly biased I have even provided citations which are the same websites as the ones used for Steven Gerrard. I suggest you stop or you are going to get reported. --Goofdawg (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

What on earth?
What is going on here? Glen 10:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

important personal attack
Better to remove. Part of WP:RBI -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

A little late
to use on someone already tagged for sock puppetry -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

West Indian cricket team in England in 2020
Hi. You seem to want to edit-war on this yet again. It's been raised multiple times, with the most recent discussion (that I could find) having the rationale of WP:RETAIN being the best option. You say there is "there is zero reason for this to be central on the page", yet there is zero reason for your instance on changing this. Please stop edit-warring, or at least, try to get a consensus by discussing it for your change(s). Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Talk Page
Hello, the whole reason of having a talk page is so you can converse with others to try and reach a consensus with editing. I notice you don't respond to any of the discussions on your talk page. This is maybe an area in which you could improve as an editor. Regards PaajonesPaajones (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Paajones
Hello, could you please explain what you meant by your accusation of me using multiple accounts? Thanks Paajones (talk) 22:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

3-5-2
The formation wiki isn't just for popular formations. It contains most formations used in the history of football including ones no longer used. When reading the 3-5-2 it makes it seem like it's a rare formation that rarely gets used which is not the case. Specifying that it is a common formation is beneficial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbuonastella (talk • contribs) 02:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

stats article
Can you let me know if you decide to DRV any of the stats articles, cheers. Govvy (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Angel Gomes
What is your problem? You keep reverting my edits on Angel Gomes' page where I correctly state he is a free agent. If you could be bothered to read the article on free agency you would see that it simply means a player who is currently without a club. How can a prominent Wikipedia editor like yourself not know this fact? Inexorable Existence (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

FIFA Club World Cup and List of UEFA competitions winners
Hi, I left a note on the talk page. Please, share your thoughts. Govnery (talk) 10:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Use your head before you unedit revisions
I ensured conformity and consistency between each Manchester United season and you just undid everything. I spent over an hour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.174.182.20 (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Pakistani cricket team in England in 2020
Please stop yet another lame attempt at edit-warring on these type of articles. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 12:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Please see MOS:NUMERAL and stop edit-warring. Prehaps, bring it to the talkpage instead?  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

UEL draws for SF
https://www.uefa.com/uefaeuropaleague/news/025f-0fda7a5243b4-f97f3fb9e435-1000--europa-league-finals-schedule/

winners of QF4 and QF2 will play first on 16th then QF3 and QF1 play on 17th — Preceding unsigned comment added by Em 88 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Former MUTV logo (2).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Former MUTV logo (2).png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification of a discussion which you may be interested in
I am writing to draw your attention to a discussion that may be of interest to you concerning the article for the 2020–21 Manchester United F.C. season, which can be found here. Please feel free to contribute to the linked-to discussion. Sparkle1 (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Trouble in the tunnel
You may be interested in this Articles for deletion/Trouble in the Tunnel (2nd nomination) Footballistically (talk) 13:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Season article
Thank you for that. I'd have done it myself but at the time, it seemed like every time I came on here there was some sort of argument, and I ended up walking almost away for a couple of weeks. Anyway, I've added a bit more content to the structure you left, and with a bit of luck it'll stick this time. The Luton editor seems to be managing all right with theirs. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

intercontinental cup
hello, I ask you to check a dangerous Brazilian user, he does not accept FIFA statutes and regulations, he is probably a fan of the palmairas--87.9.146.172 (talk) 16:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

User talk:2.97.208.34
An IP you warned earlier has been given a 4im warning by me for change of dates on Diego Maradonna based on the recent block and warnings they have already been issued with, they have however made quite a few edits since their block and I'm not familiar enough with football articles to judge them. Perhaps someone from project football could take a peek? Thank you JW 1961   Talk  22:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Wolfsberger AC
There is a consensus in English Wikipedia to follow WP:KARLSRUHER, which is used for almost 10 years already, and you know about that, cause this was already discussed in December 2019 (and noone supported your idea of changing name). If you think this should be changed you should start new discussion in WP:WPF and reach new consensus. But you can't make such changes just because you want so. Alex (talk) 09:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Since when does that essay have widespread acceptance among the community? Not only that, the essay explicitly states "a shortened name can be used, once the proper name has been established". I don't have a problem with establishing the identity of the club using its longer name, but once that has been done, there is no need to avoid using the shorter name, especially in cases where that shorter name is in use in the English-speaking media. – PeeJay 09:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It has widespread acceptance among the community for like 10 years already. As you obviously saw, naming of German and Austrian clubs done with accordance with that essay and everyone were fine with that. And now you just came and think you can change that just cause you want, without discussing it with anyone. Also I like how you intentionally missed the main part of the sentence: "Obviously in article prose, a shortened name can be used, once the proper name has been established, to make the text flow more easily". Seems like you either have short memory, or intentionally pretending that you don't know about this, despite it being discussed in 2018 and YOU participated in that discussion: . Alex (talk) 10:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * What difference does it make whether it's in the article prose or anywhere else? And yes, I've seen the essay and I know a few people like to cite it because it has the WP:KARLSRUHER redirect, which is easy to remember, but I disagree that it is supported by a consensus. I'm not the only one who disagrees with it. – PeeJay 10:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Name Wolfsberger AC was used everywhere in English Wikipedia since club got that name. So this is current consensus. If you disagree with this naming - create discussion and discuss. But I know they you're not doing this cause you know that people won't support you (as happened last time) and hoping that you can just quietly change naming. Alex (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Just because something has been done a certain way for a long time doesn't mean that way is correct. Please provide evidence that the club should only be referred to as Wolfsberger AC. – PeeJay 10:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not you who decide if this is correct or not. Using for a long time means that it's current consensus. Create the discussion and make an attempt to reach new consensus if you want so. Alex (talk) 10:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * First you have to establish that WP:KARLSRUHER is something to be followed. There is no evidence that the assertions there are correct, so why should we follow it? I can provide you with evidence that the club is known as just "Wolfsberg" for short, but no one has yet provided any evidence that they should be referred to as "Wolfsberger AC". – PeeJay 10:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It doesn't work like that. It has already been followed for years now so it's YOU who should establish why it shouldn't be followed anymore. It's not just me or you who decide if it should be followed or not. Create discussion (writing this for like fifth time) and write your thoughts there. If people will agree that naming should be changed - then change it everywhere, not just in one single article. And this is last time I'm moving what you have wrote to this talk page. I'm not going to answer anything you wrote on my talk page anymore cause I'm tired of moving you comments to here everytime. Alex (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

List of Belgian football transfers summer 2020
Hi PeeJay, I agree loan returns are not transfers per sé, imho they are an integral part of the overview because these are players are shifting teams, same goes for retirements and contracts being terminated. Hence I added the information explaining that, why do you insist on having these removed?

Similarly, the overview by team imho is a very useful addition and maybe even more so than the view per day (although that one also has valid information to see from which day a player was available for a club). Anyway in short, I don't agree with your edits. Notice as well this Template:Belgian football transfers, which shows all the previous year's articles in a similar format and with loans/retirements/etc... included. Pelotastalk&#124; contribs 11:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

RE:English flags on list of English football transfers summer 2020
Hi there,

It is not my intention to launch an 'edit war', I am just simply keeping the list in line with previous lists on the same subject which all have English flags for players. I also believe that some people who may view this page could get slightly confused at the lack of flags for players if they have viewed said previous lists. I hope we can continue to leave flags for players as they are so as to avoid confusion and lack of stability between lists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BooTubeist (talk • contribs) 15:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

User:Riku maina
I've blocked them for a week. Let me know if they come back and carry on after the block expires. Black Kite (talk) 14:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Invitation vs qualification
Hi, Recentlty I updated 1971–72 UEFA Cup page, and I saw that you cleaned that up. Thanks. I have one question. You corrected this sentence from "Originally 64 teams were expected to play, but before their first match Vllaznia from Albania withdrawn." to "64 teams qualified, but Vllaznia from Albania withdrew before their first match." I really appreciate the syntactic updates, but I have a semantic question/concern. According to Bert Kassies page in that year clubs were invited by UEFA, which - in my opinion - is not identical to being qualified. Unfortunately I don't know how many teams were originally invited, that's why I wrote "64 teams were expected to play" because that's the only information what I know (according to UEFA and RSSSF). Regards, --Simy (talk) 18:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Wales national football team
 * added a link pointing to Daniel Siebert
 * Wales national football team results 2020–2039
 * added a link pointing to Daniel Siebert

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wales national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Siebert.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Kits for 2004 Football League First Division play-off Final
Hi PeeJay, not sure if you can help, but would you be able to see if you could add the kits to the subject article? I've never done it before and I think when you create your formation diagrams you also pay attention to the kits? If not, no stress. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!&#33;!&#33;) 18:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Matěj Kovář
Please just knock it off, OK? I am simply restoring the infobox that was in the original version of the article and which is in-line with the template documentation. GiantSnowman 10:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Charity Shield/League Cup/FA Cup substitutions
Hi PeeJay,

I’m not saying that any of the edits that you’ve made are wrong. However, as the history of substitutions in English football is an extremely complex issue, I thought I would discuss some of the edits that you’ve made to various pages.

I notice that it was you who created the following five articles: 1977 FA Charity Shield, 1983 FA Charity Shield, 1985 FA Charity Shield, 1993 FA Charity Shield, 1994 FA Charity Shield.

Are you 100% sure that teams were allowed to make three substitutions in the 1977, 1985 and 1993 editions of the FA Charity Shield.

The reason I ask this question is because – if this is true – it would make it the first competition in English football to allow this to happen until it was permitted in the Football League in 1993/94 and the FA Premier League in 1994/95.

The fact that three substitutions never actually took place until the 1995 edition of the FA Charity Shield makes me sceptical that it is true, although it could have been the case that one of the three substitutes needed to replace a goalkeeper prior to 1995. That would make sense because the chances of a goalkeeper getting replaced and two further substitutes entering the field are pretty high odds.

Likewise, are you 100% sure that teams were allowed to make two substitutions in the 1983 and 1994 editions of the FA Charity Shield?

The reason I ask this question is because it’s very rare for a competition to reduce the number of substitutions a team can make from the previous year, although the Football League did reduce the amount of players who could sit on the bench in 2011/12 from seven to five. Obviously this current season saw some changes to substitutions too but the previous measures were only supposed to be temporary.

Thirdly, I notice that you made the following edit to the page entitled 1994 Football League Cup Final:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1994_Football_League_Cup_Final&diff=624152819&oldid=623933760

Are you 100% sure that only two of the three substitutes could be used?

The reason why I ask this question is because in 1992/93 and 1993/94, the FA Premier League and the Football League had different rules regarding substitutions. In 1992/93, the Football League Cup and FA Cup both aligned their rules regarding substitutions with the Football League. So I find it very strange that both cup competitions would change tact and align their rules regarding substitutions with the FA Premier League the following season.

So, for the reason mentioned, I’m also sceptical whether the 1994 FA Cup Final article – which also says only two of the three substitutes could be used – is correct, although it was a different contributor who added the information in this instance.

To provide some context, in 1992/93, the FA Premier League allowed teams to name three players on the bench whereas the Football League only allowed teams to name two players on the bench (both competitions allowed two substitutions to be made). However, in 1993/94, the Football League allowed teams to make three substitutions – as long as one of the players replaced was a goalkeeper – whereas the FA Premier League only allowed teams to make two substitutions (both competitions allowed three substitutes to be named on the bench). In 1994/95 and 1995/96, the FA Premier League, Football League, Football League Cup and FA Cup all aligned themselves regarding substitutions (three could be made but one needed to replace a goalkeeper in 1994/95; three could be made and none needed to replace a goalkeeper in 1995/96).

So – to sum up – it’s the FA Charity Shield prior to 1995, the Football League Cup in 1993/94 and the FA Cup in 1993/94 that I am not too sure about.

Hopefully, this hasn’t set your head in a spin. It’s certainly set my head in a spin writing it. Haha!

All the best.

Standingfish (talk) 15:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi PeeJay,


 * Thanks very much for your reply.


 * The pages for the 1975, 1976, 1978, 1979 and 1980 FA Charity Shields also state that three substitutions could be made. However, this information was added by other contributors.


 * Regarding the FA Charity Shields before 1995, I think it will be very difficult to find out how many substitutions were allowed.


 * However, one day I might go through the Football League Cup and FA Cup archives from the 1993/94 season to see whether any teams actually made three substitutions (one of which would have been to replace a goalkeeper). However, as it's very rare for a goalkeeper to be replaced and two further substitutions to be made, there is no guarantee that I will find the answers that I'm looking for (even if three substitutions were allowed).


 * All the best.


 * Standingfish (talk) 15:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 1997–98 Kent Football League for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1997–98 Kent Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/1997–98 Kent Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

2018 FA Cup Final
Hi PeeJay, hope you're well. I've got the subject article at FAC now, and I've been asked for a source for the positions shown in File:Chelsea vs Man Utd 2018-05-19.svg. Any thoughts? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!&#33;!&#33;) 08:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Re: Commons
Hey there!

Yes, one moment and I'll get back to you. Arbero (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sent you a reply on Commons a few minutes ago. Arbero (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

2020 team page season edits
If that is what WP:NFL suggests, help me edit all other team pages. Don’t stop at just the Viking’s page.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 22:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northampton saints badge.png
Thanks for uploading File:Northampton saints badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

An apology
Hey, sorry about treating you like I have for the past week. You just struck a nerve with me and lead to me treating you with low tollerance like that. I hope you're willing to forgive me and maybe we can move past this.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 18:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit summary at Rugby World Cup
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. realsanix (Hello!) 16:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Never mind realsanix (Hello!) 16:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Line-up graphics for rugby union
What do you use to make these? WDM10 (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)WDM10 19:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

A notice
Hi! So far FCSB lost the name but still holds the record from 1947 to present. In the 1985–86 European Cup can't be CSA Steaua București (football) because yet they don't hold the record. There is no DEFINITIVE decision. All the links must bring to FCSB. Lawsuits are currently judged. So feel free to revert vandalisms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F0F:301A:E400:2583:4125:14B5:DC1 (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

..
Hello, I do not know how to say that I did not put sources even though I put up the official website of UEFA, which lists the information regarding the number of fans as I put it, and as for the information of goalkeeper Dida, the finals that ended in penalties are; 1984, 1986, 1988, 1991, 1996, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2012, and 2016. You can watch it to see who the goalkeeper has taken the most penalties in the Final matches. --Mishary94 (talk) 10:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, why did you remove my other edit about the attendance despite having a reliable source (official website of UEFA)? --Mishary94 (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * What you do by removing confirmed information under the pretext that there are no sources and arguing that one reliable source is not enough is a dictatorship that is not allowed here, and by virtue of having six years of experience with Wikipedia, you are removing the information with an irresponsible individual act, please stop this, thanks. --Mishary94 (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It seems that you did not inform the source, the source talks about the match between Celtic and Leeds United, as well as the Barcelona and Paris Saint-Germain match, as well as the 1960 final and 1999 final. Yes, it is true. My English may be weak, but I am sure that I am not practicing dictatorship :)--Mishary94 (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Deprodding of List of political families in Indian cricket administration
I have removed the tag from List of political families in Indian cricket administration, which you proposed for deletion. Talk:List of political families in Indian cricket administration. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! ChunnuBhai (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Premiership rugby
What are the rules on sponsor names for stadia? I see you reversed the change re Welford Road, but Ricoh and AJ Bell remain untouched. (Genuine question!) Paddyreilly (talk) 08:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Team Kits of Bayern and Chelsea
I am Oscar and Why did you erase the Team Kits for some seasons of Bayern and Chelsea, I remember exactly the kits were used in real life Here is the list Chelsea 2006-07, 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 all kits and including combinations

Bayern Munich 2008-09 Bayern all Kits and Third kit with white socks were used against Hamburg away from home 2010-11 Bayern all Kits and Third kit with white socks were used against Hamburg away from home 2011-12 Bayern all Kits and Third kit with white socks were used against Hamburg away from home 2017-18 Bayern all Kits and Third kit with white socks were used against Hamburg away from home 2018-19 Bayern all Kits including 2019-20 home kit 2019-20 Bayern all Kits including 2020-21 home kit

Note: During the final Matchday of 2011-12, Chelsea uses his 2012-13 Home kit against Blackburn Rovers and the same do in 2015-16 season Matchday 38 against Leicester where uses the 2016-17 Home Kit.

For 2017-18 Matchday 38 against Newcastle, they used the 2018-19 home kit, and in Matchday 37 of the 2018-19 season used 2019-20 home kit against Watford

Recently last Saturday against Newcastle, Chelse uses the third kit with Pink socks

Could you please put the kits back so kindly, since those kits were used in the corresponding matches in real life?

Atte: Oscar — Preceding unsigned comment added by OscarWongLara1999 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of international goals scored by Sylvain Wiltord for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Sylvain Wiltord, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Sylvain Wiltord until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry
Hey just want to say sorry making that edit saying twitter was not a reliable source, I was under the impression that Twitter was banned as a source altogether and was not aware of the verified accounts being different.

I was busy when I was told of this in a talk section and could not undo my edit before you did.

Sorry about all of that. Maurice Oly (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Why u bully me!!
U joined Wikipedia 15 years ago. You’re quite sad you’ve had nothing to do for 15 years. PEEJAY is a really strange name your probably a Child Predator ( Scottish Accent). Richie Carrin jhonson (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Llanelli Town A.F.C. seasons


A tag has been placed on Category:Llanelli Town A.F.C. seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autumn Nations Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rory Sutherland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Greek Football Cup
Hi, you helped with some edits before on Greek Football Cup article. A minor controversy exists that led to an edit war. It is about statistics. 1961-62 Greek Football Cup final between Olympiacos and Panathinaikos was abandoned in overtime and the Federation never ordered a replay. There is a user Kyopa who keeps adding both finalists as runners-up, but in my opinion this leads to a statistical error. When a sport competition is abandoned there can be no winner/runner-up. You can see the discussion on the article's Talk page. Thought you can help as you are an experienced editor. Best regards! Abudabanas (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2003–04 Llanelli Scarlets season


Hello, PeeJay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2003–04 Llanelli Scarlets season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Paul Scholes
Would you please explain this revert ? Why is this vandalism and who is the master? Materialscientist (talk) 12:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Links
Hi, I'm letting you know that duplicate links are okay in a table. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2Fwikipedia%3Amanual_of_style%2Flinking%23duplicate_and_repeat_links for more information. TPalkovitz TPalkovitz (talk) 01:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)