User talk:PeeJay/Archive 27

Your draft article, Draft:2003–04 Llanelli Scarlets season


Hello, PeeJay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2003–04 Llanelli Scarlets season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Own goals in the table
In the section for squad statistics, the table includes Manchester United's squad and each player's goals, appearances, and cards. Nowhere in the name SQUAD statistics indicate that we need to include every goal in favour of Manchester United. The table is meant for statistics for each player and information about the man united team. We would care about own goals made by Man United because one of the players on Manchester United made the own goal, whereas including an own goal made by a differing team completely drives away from the point of the table. Mwiqdoh (talk) 03:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

what???
Your logic makes no sense. We should include the hidden note for "mentally stunted" editors, but we can't include the visible note for "mentally stunted" readers? How does that make sense? You just claimed that "it should be obvious unless you're mentally stunted" but yet we included the hidden note? Explain this please. Mwiqdoh (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Govvy (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Chiefs-Bills AFC Divisional Game Article Title
Hello, I just wanted to reach out and see what your thoughts were about the title of the Chiefs-Bills divisional game. I had changed it to '13 Seconds' and hoped it would stick. Perhaps it's not known by the title '13 Seconds' to everyone, but I think it's a fair reference to the game and I sort of don't understand the difference between using that as the title and other notable playoff game article titles like Epic in Miami or Ghost to the Post or Mile High Miracle. It's good that the search term '13 Seconds' redirects to this page, but I was hoping a change of the actual article title would be possible. Anyway, thanks for considering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Botwin2015 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Frank  Anchor  03:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @PeeJay: I take the point that BLP-violating trolls are a problem and I blocked the IP for a year (they have previous form). However, the reason you should not use an edit summary like in diff is that WP:DENY is the best procedure. The IP doesn't really believe what they wrote—it's just a way of getting attention and/or expressing irritation with the person they are attacking. The problem with such an edit summary is that it gives them attention and excites the human response of retaliation. Just use rollback or a bland revert with an edit summary like "rvv" (rv v = revert vandalism). Don't even mention the BLP problem. Being as boring as possible mean their vandalism is less fun which helps them find another website to make trouble. Johnuniq (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Coaching trees
Quick question: Didn't the NFL project decide to remove or limit coaching trees? I thought I remembered that, so I removed them from the Jim E. Mora and Brian Billick articles. There are more, but I've only removed the ones that were on my watchlist. Thanks. (Oh, on the banned user comment, it was a poor joke on my part. Sorry.) BilCat (talk) 20:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Spring!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mifter (talk • contribs) 22:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Segunda Division 2007-08
Tom, if you could suggest any improvements for the article Segunda División 2007-08 please do so. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qampunen (talk • contribs) 07:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

RE:Template:Welsh Premier League seasons
Sorry if you were wondering what was going on. I had problems with the templates and had to rename one as two templates were just duplicating themselves. I have ameded this now and there is now two season sections. One is League of Wales and the other is Welsh Premier League. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 21:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Although the league changed in 2002? Also I didn't try to delete the League of Wales seasons as it was in use until 2002. I had to change League of Wales seasons to League of Wales seasons (1992-2002) because it was duplicating the information with Welsh Premier League seasons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 22:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay fair point. Well it's now says "League of Wales / Welsh Premier League" hope you have no objections to this? and we'll leave it at that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 22:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

So what is going to happen when the Welsh Premier League is split into two divisions in a few seasons from now? P.S. I'll leave the navbox as it is because at this rate it would have just blown out as a fude or something — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 22:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Also Thank You for sorting out the caregories, it was taking me ages trying to change it to League of Wales :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 22:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Transfers
Hi. I was just wondering why you deleted my list of the 2007/08 Premier League highest transfers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littleowls (talk • contribs) 11:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok no problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littleowls (talk • contribs) 11:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Tottenham Hotspur
so why can't the badge be used...when in the club season football infobox there is a section labelled "logo =" and the description being " — The club logo."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prem4eva (talk • contribs) 21:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

FC Shortcuts
Just a quick tip for you. The next time you wish to link a football club all you need to do is type rather than the full name. I did that on the Derby County record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoseNuggets (talk • contribs) 18:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

exactly
what do you mean what do you mean by exactly, i was agreeing you were right dipshit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.201.174 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Richard Hawkins
Hey Peejay, I've provided a link on the Manchester United discussion page. I was just browsing through the Sheffield United website and it stated that he left Sheff Utd to join Man Utd on March 9th 2008. — Preceding unsigned comment added by consulrjo (talk • contribs) 20:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Tottenham Hotspur
Barcelona have confirmed that Giovani dos Santos has signed with Tottenham and will join the club on the 1st of July. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikemor92 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Nice job
You're doing a really fantastic job keeping the various Euro 2008-related articles up-to-date and clean. Keep it up! JACO PLANE  • 2008-06-10 16:30 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacoplane (talk • contribs) 17:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Fabio
I've been writing articles for 5 years on Wiki and that's not how I interpret the spirit of wiki - you will find lots of reserve team players on here so how do you justify this decision? Theo Walcott was a prime example and I could point out lots of examples — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robdav69 (talk • contribs) 11:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

David Healy
What is wrong with the David Healy page of his international carrer if you merge it with the main page it makes the list longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 13:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

last comment
'You should also realise that they didn't use the same formation in every match'. What am I supposed to know. my opinion is that scolari always used a 5-3-2 formation with Brazil and yet you criticize me for not knowing. I take it you are another one of the upper class snobs in wikipedia who claim to be right about everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.101.83 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

formation for Brazil.
have a look at formation (association football) on wikipedia and have a look at 3-5-2 and you will see Brazil 2002 World Cup winner played it all the way throughout the tournament. Ronaldinho played as a central midfielder and Rivaldo played as a striker alongside Ronaldo and Cafu and Roberto Carlos played as wingers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.101.83 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

yep I was right about you. you are an arrogant upper class snob who claims to know everything like everyone on wikipedia. just because people get things wrong you like to put people down by showing off your arrogance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.101.83 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

enforcing policy!!!! why are u involved with people who want to make people be wrong all the time and writing u should do this and that and effectively saying ha you're wrong and I'm right and I am the best because I am a computer master with wikipedia who has got A's and B's in computer science or whatever and there is nothing u can do about it. why mate? why be involved with nasty people like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.101.83 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

alplogy accepted. at least there is some decent human beings around. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.101.83 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Taskforce on Association Football Variants
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alistairjh (talk • contribs) 13:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Wembley Cup Final Templates
I propose you use your template and you could replace these templates which are on Wembley Stadium (1923) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 19:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Every Wembley Cup Final should have this templete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 20:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I will go up the 1969 FA Cup Final at put in the details when I finish the job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 21:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I have done 1923-1962 could you check the useless parts but keep the Wembley picture because it shows you the groud with the final. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 21:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree but when i get to the 2008 FA Cup Final it will be England v Wales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 12:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Cardiff City v Portsmouth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs) 12:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

CONCACAF U-20 Championship
Hey, I was trying to move CONCACAF Under-20 Championship to CONCACAF U-20 Championship since all of the yearly articles are titled 2009 CONCACAF U-20 Championship, etc. I was unable to because the title was on the "title blacklist." You know what the deal is with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grant.Alpaugh (talk • contribs) 19:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Check this out
User:Drew R. Smith/game — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drew R. Smith (talk • contribs) 10:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Manchester United "diary of the season"
I have recorded the events of Manchester United seasons in the style of articles such as "years in the United Kingdom" as shown in the following link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir Stanley (talk • contribs) 17:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship
Notice you where in a bit of a edit war on the 2009 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship, just wondering if you could point out where in the rules it forbiddes "live updating", have been in similare situation and wants something to fall back on or is WP:NOT ok?. --> Halmstad,  Charla to moi  22:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halmstad (talk • contribs) 23:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thnx. -->  Halmstad,  Charla to moi  22:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halmstad (talk • contribs) 23:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Piqué
but why that but? all others estão FC Barcelona. Wherefore shift just a single? already we talk on the subject of that & they had he came a peace accord what barely the Henry remain Barcelona. I no has agreed to. FC Barcelona is the title of the club. Always is above mentioned with the FC ". Thus, owes continue being FC Barcelona. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruninho (talk • contribs) 01:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

About the FC Templates
For the record, ((subst:fc)) and ((fc)) are both one in the same. The second one is just a shortcut. NoseNuggets (talk) 7:42 PM US EDT Aug 12 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoseNuggets (talk • contribs) 00:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

List of Manchester United F.C. records and statistics Edits
Tom

Anything wrong with the changed table i contributed to?

Matt435 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt435 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

3RR notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 1968 Intercontinental Cup. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barek (talk • contribs) 19:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Barek (talk • contribs) 19:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Rodrigo Possebon nationality
Hey PeeJay2K3, I got a question and a subject that I think should be changed. Why is Rodrigo Possebon nationality is presented as Italy and not Brazil? even tho he did play for the Italian national team he played in the under-20 team, which by FIFA does not mean he can not play or present in the senior team the country of birth which is Brazil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HonorTheKing (talk • contribs) 04:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Lists of National Football League starting quarterbacks
Category:Lists of National Football League starting quarterbacks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Selinker (talk • contribs) 22:53, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Football/Soccer player infoboxes
Do you ever follow this entire statement on WP:KARLSRUHER regarding the club names? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikemor92 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Man Utd Season Info
http://www.aboutmanutd.com/

This is the website that I got the goal times from. I don't know how far it goes back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swood1989 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:R.E. Mouscron squad
Template:R.E. Mouscron squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pelotas (talk • contribs) 09:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Pedro Proença
Hey PeeJay2K3, P3DRO here.

I saw that you updated Pedro Proença's page. I did it too but I must confess that my english is a little bit rusty and I become repetitive. Could you do me a favor and go see it?

I apologize for the inconvenience.

Keep up the good work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by P3DRO (talk • contribs) 16:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Help me to design Association football line-ups for AFF Suzuki Cup 2012
PeeJay2k3 I need your help for designing the Football Line-Ups of 2012 AFF Suzuki Cup (2012 AFF Suzuki Cup Group A/ 2012 AFF Suzuki Cup Group B). Here are the official website AFF Suzuki Cup official website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wester. Inc (talk • contribs) 23:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— Preceding unsigned comment added by AssociateAffiliate (talk • contribs) 19:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

flag of belgium:
it is necessary because almost everyone thinks that flag of belgium has 2:3 dimension intead of 13:15. Flag of japan has been modified in 1999 to actual — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aight 2009 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Flag of Japan
I hadn't made mistake because flag of Japan since 1999 has brighter red colour and circle is perfectly on the center. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aight 2009 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * For example I place vexicology website including mention about japan flag http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/jp.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aight 2009 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

flag of japan pre 1999
I wrote again beacause i can't write in tal properly: I place vexicology website including mention about japan flag http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/jp.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aight 2009 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richmond Road ground


The article Richmond Road ground has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KenBailey (talk • contribs) 07:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

About the field graphics
In the Wiki Page 2010 FIFA World Cup Final, there seems to be a graphic in the middle listing all 21 players. Did you do that via MS Paint or what? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weka (talk • contribs) 01:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenman (talk • contribs) 19:14, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

New message
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Davykamanzi (talk • contribs) 16:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

European Cup and Champions League Seasons
Does it. Makes the final looks the same as the all the other games leading up to it, and looks like another match played in that season. There is nothing wrong with duplicating the match details showing the players who played in the final. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DARRIN01 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Super Bowl XLVIII
Why is it overkill to put in more pertinent stats of the game? This should be a web encyclopedia where more information is beneficial and essential. Please respond. Thanks.

mkbngr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkbngr (talk • contribs) 03:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

What I added for stats are usually included in official accounts of NFL games and especially the Super Bowl. Things such as punt returns, kickoff returns. Most fans looking for a stats page expect things like that; I think they would also want it here. To me, that is what I would consider as pertinent. I hope enough users of this would be in favor of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkbngr (talk • contribs) 06:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Srna/Pranjić
In that case I apologize. If it's official, then it's ok. Thanks & much respect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1cky (talk • contribs) 10:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

question from Ronaldo's page
what is up with the dates consisting of the number first and then the month in the English language?? seriously its gotten on my nerve and you just stated its not a correction today is June 27, 2014 not 27 June 2014.

sc30002001← — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sc30002001 (talk • contribs) 13:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Messi's name
Look: http://www.fcbarcelona.com/football/first-team/staff/players/messi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gringoladomenega (talk • contribs) 23:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Shinji Kagawa
Why did believe my edit was wrong? In football articles it's preferred to 1.72 m instead of 172 cm. Both add up to the same size in feet and inches. My edit was constructive and wasn't bad. There was really no reason revert my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldenBoy25 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

In that case all of these need to change.
 * Neymar
 * Ronaldinho
 * Lionel Messi
 * Wayne Rooney
 * Javier Hernández Balcázar
 * Raúl Jiménez
 * Keisuke Honda
 * Park Joo-Ho
 * Miroslav Klose
 * David Luiz
 * Tim Krul

2015 Indian Premier League Group Stage
Hello, I understood your opinion. But I checked 2011 Indian Premier League Group Stage in 2011 Indian Premier League, its only 2011 Indian Premier League Group Stage not 2011 Indian Premier League group stage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinu523 (talk • contribs) 05:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Penmiss
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret Agent Julio (talk • contribs) 18:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret Agent Julio (talk • contribs) 21:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Questions...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret Agent Julio (talk • contribs) 22:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Final NFL Playoff games at stadiums
Here are all the playoff games that are mentioned as the 1st/last game in the last 21 years. So it is relevant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_Seattle_Seahawks_10.2C_Minnesota_Vikings_9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012%E2%80%9313_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_San_Francisco_49ers_45.2C_Green_Bay_Packers_31

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011%E2%80%9312_NFL_playoffs#AFC:_Houston_Texans_31.2C_Cincinnati_Bengals_10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011%E2%80%9312_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_New_York_Giants_24.2C_Atlanta_Falcons_2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%9309_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_Philadelphia_Eagles_23.2C_New_York_Giants_11

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007%E2%80%9308_NFL_playoffs#AFC:_San_Diego_Chargers_28.2C_Indianapolis_Colts_24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007%E2%80%9308_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_New_York_Giants_21.2C_Dallas_Cowboys_17

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003%E2%80%9304_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_Carolina_Panthers_29.2C_St._Louis_Rams_23_.282OT.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002%E2%80%9303_NFL_playoffs#AFC:_New_York_Jets_41.2C_Indianapolis_Colts_0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002%E2%80%9303_NFL_playoffs#NFC_Championship:_Tampa_Bay_Buccaneers_27.2C_Philadelphia_Eagles_10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001%E2%80%9302_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_Philadelphia_Eagles_33.2C_Chicago_Bears_19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001–02_NFL_playoffs#AFC:_New_England_Patriots_16.2C_Oakland_Raiders_13_.28OT.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001%E2%80%9302_NFL_playoffs#AFC:_Pittsburgh_Steelers_27.2C_Baltimore_Ravens_10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999%E2%80%932000_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_St._Louis_Rams_49.2C_Minnesota_Vikings_37

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998%E2%80%9399_NFL_playoffs#AFC:_Jacksonville_Jaguars_25.2C_New_England_Patriots_10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997%E2%80%9398_NFL_playoffs#NFC:_Tampa_Bay_Buccaneers_20.2C_Detroit_Lions_10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997%E2%80%9398_NFL_playoffs#AFC_Championship:_Denver_Broncos_24.2C_Pittsburgh_Steelers_21

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim103093 (talk • contribs) 12:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Texans All-Pro team
But they made the All-Pro team, it doesnt matter if its first team or second team. It not only looks cleaner without the extra classification, last year neither Watt nor Hopkins selections were specified on last year's page. Also, an EDGE rusher is a DE. EDGE is not a position. Clowney plays DE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstrokos (talk • contribs) 18:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Re: Old Trafford
If you actually read the section on rugby league in the Old Trafford page it clearly states that the 2013 Rugby League World Cup Final had the world record attendance for an international rugby league match with references to that. Its note #102. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoldenV8 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

2016 Super Cup
I am not making circular argument. I am just keeping discussing the question. It's you don't have the willingness to discuss the issue and denied other's ideas and evidence at will. Apparently, these words should be for you. You are the one who consistently prevent normal edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 七战功成 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Lukaku edit reverted
So you want to wait till 18-19 season to divide it into 2 subsections? Isnt it better to know the season for which you are reading? How can having a subsection hurt? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Partheshmittal (talk • contribs) 15:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Just so you know
I don't give a shit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Anti-Hypocrorist (talk • contribs) 18:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

fb team templates
Honest question: what is the problem with them? Can't see it myself, but I've been wrong before! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Green daemon (talk • contribs) 20:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talk • contribs) 03:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Jared Allen
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/A/AlleJa22.htm

PFR is generally a better source than NFL.com, but I'm not going to start an edit war about it, so your call on what to do there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.64.7.60 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Article reverted
1998 FIFA World cup, Argentina vs England Hi. I do apologize because I don't know that Wikipedia was your own property. I am busy with writing and my text disappear suddenly ! (Check History box) You say "Poor English" and I totally agree. I am French spoken. But its'nt better to correct it than fully reverted ? Using "talk" button is also more human than reverting without a word for contributor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanon11 (talk • contribs) 22:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Maruoane Fellaini
Hello mate, if you don't mind, can you locked the Fellaini's article for prevent the Vandalism, cause I see so many unknown users who trying to ruining this article. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by BPL2007 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

disruptive edits to Manchester United FC??

 * I was the first that put Joel Pereira on loan when it was communicated by club
 * I fixed an edit wrong when someone put Pogba as a captain instead of Valencia
 * I put correct squad numbers on United template, but you put old squad numbers again and again...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlejandroR1990 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Premier League 2017-18
Hey PeeJay2K3,

I saw you removed the image of the review of the 2017-18 Premier League season I uploaded, citing that I could use a photo from flickr etc. The use of match day programs seems widespread though (e.g. FA Cup Finals), where you could make the same argument. What your rationale for the difference between the two.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jopal22 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Redskins at Vikings stats
I got the stats from and  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayomaju (talk • contribs) 11:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayomaju (talk • contribs) 11:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Super Bowl kickoff
You kidding me!? You don't have your clock aside when watching the Super Bowl. I noticed. I need to pay more almanacs in the future, NFL now as it's own game summary source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcatnoc23 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

FK Crvena Zvezda Beograd
Stupid edits? Red star Belgrade is from Serbia and always has been. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 17:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Serbia was in Yugoslavia also one of 6 republics. Serbia was kingdom and empire. Serbia is not formed 1992 from brakeup of Yugoslavia. Serbia existed all the time. In Champions League history is right Serbia flag is for Red Star Belgrade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 17:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Is Liverpool from Britain or England? England play football not Britain. Celtic is from Scotland or Britain? What flag is for these clubs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 17:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Is England independent or Scotland from UK? Which flag is next to Celtic or West Ham? UK flag or England and Scotland flags? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 17:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

No clubs from England and Scotland reach CL final, only clubs from UK and Britain flag. England is not independent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 17:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Champions_League

In this article Red Star is flag of Serbia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 08:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC) And in this pictures all winners of championship of Europe are blue and Serbia too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Cup_and_UEFA_Champions_League_records_and_statistics — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 09:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The determinant for the Red Star club is the flag and the country of Serbia in all statistics. Red Star is from Serbia and capital Belgrade from 1945 till today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talk • contribs) 09:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

93 Lions edit
imho you've deleted attempts to make the article more value added and meaningful; you've reverted it to a meaningless sterile few facts. thanks for demotivating me from editing rugby articles, and thus giving me significant time back for the rest of my life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCJC777 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rugby viadana badge.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rugby viadana badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks
Cheers for reverting the edits of Elucidations on the many articles. Sorry that Man Utd are so crap right now. And thanks for McKenna. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Reverts to Minnesota Vikings seasons
Hello PeeJay.

I wanted to ask why you reverted my edits on the Minnesota Vikings pages that are currently listed as stubs, but did not update the class from stub to something else? If you believe they aren't stubs you should be changing them to a different class after the reverts. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Man Utd not ahead of Liverpool
You've made 4 reverts in a short space of time. I initially reported it but forgot I had not warned you. Would you like to self-revert (and in the process, withdraw your false claim that my content dispute with you is "vandalism") and then carry on the talk on the talk page? Or would you prefer me to reinstate the noticeboard report which is visible? --Marching on Leeds (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Your edits are vandalism. The talk page is very clear about prior discussions, and you are adding unreferenced content. Koncorde (talk) 13:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

2022 FA Cup Final
Hi there, I noticed you keep making large reverts at 2022 FA Cup Final. I don't quite understand why you're doing this - the content you're removing seems perfectly fine and you've blitzed a load of other good edits by other users in the process - so please could you explain your reasoning for this? Cheers — Jthistle38 (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Odd Behavior
I noticed you removing warnings from your talk page when they are issued. I hope you are taking these warnings to heart and not throwing them under the rug. Cheers. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 20:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Man Utd / Liverpool parity
Afternoon, you'll see I reverted both the Liverpool and Man Utd claims of parity out of the articles. Both claims are dependent upon referencing List of football clubs in England by competitive honours won which as we know is a big ol' piece of WP:SYNTH as no official count of trophies in any includes the SoL, but it squeeks by because it's a "list" and treats all SoL equally (even though it then conflicts with reliable sources when discussing those clubs actual trophy hauls). Have requested official sources covering the trophy total, which I know don't exist - and in most cases even exclude the modern Charity Shield and other "minor" competitions and one offs. If we have continued issues I suggest raising a topic on the main WP:FOOTBALL project page to discuss and resolve the discrepancy between our "list" and popular reliable sources. Koncorde (talk) 13:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * On the above list article a discussion has been started about the SoL that will be of interest to you. Koncorde (talk) 11:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at AT&T Byron Nelson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjematherplease leave a message... 05:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you would choose edit-warring over discussion, especially when there is already a thread with your name on it at the 3RR noticeboard. Please reconsider your approach to collaborative editing. wjematherplease leave a message... 06:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Why?!
Why undo the edit?! What I put is factually correct!!

Now cancelling my DD to Wikimedia. Sick and sore tired of entitled moderators thinking they always know best. BRACK66 (talk) 09:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Man Utd-Liverpool 66 trophies each
Hooray! How come the change of heart? --Marching on Leeds (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Oops
Sorry about that revert-unrevert noise. Was looking at history to see what was going on when I iPad-clicked on the wrong field. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 03:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * How has it been nearly two days since the above unblock request and no one has responded yet? It surely can't be the case that you're conveniently going to let the block run out before someone is available to address it? – PeeJay 22:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * PeeJay, I converted your second unblock request just above into a comment. You are not permitted to have two unblock requests open at the same time.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * And how convenient that it's the blocking admin who appeared to correct that oversight... – PeeJay 23:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I wish for it to be known that I fully support PeeJay's request for unblock, and agree that two days has been long enough, and this is coming from the main person who edit-warred with him. The matter is totally resolved and we no longer have a dispute at the article in question and are not likely to engage in edit wars of this nature again. Keeping him blocked is achieving absolutely nothing except anxiety for the individual. --Marching on Leeds (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

suggest this block now be removed as its existence is now purely punitive which flies directly against the whole purpose of blocks on Wikipedia. Cheers! The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * fyi, just in case you didn't notice, there are plenty of requests for unblock, see this page, some of them date back to April 2022, e.g. User talk:FBedits where no-one has reviewed it yet. Here, I also support PeeJay will be unblocked as soon as possible based on the above. There have been good edits in the contributions before the latest block was given. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware of the backlog, thanks Iggy. Sorry for the attitude. – PeeJay 15:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The backlog is no excuse for a blocking admin not to review the block when that admin has already acknowledged the request enough to reformat it. PeeJay has seen a show of support from far and wide and there is little point allowing anyone to appeal blocks if the admins know in advance that they have no intention of reviewing them inside the time window. Bbb23 is clearly mucking about without so much as a pretext for this obscure behaviour. Whatever excuses the other admins have, they don't stretch to Bbb23. Arrogance of this level really ought to see admins stripped of their privileges. This is pure piss-assing about that any recent change patroller would have did in due course --Marching on Leeds (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Rest assured I will be lodging a complaint at WP:ANI against User:Bbb23 after this is over. This is unacceptable behaviour above and beyond whatever offence I may have committed. – PeeJay 20:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Good luck. And yes I will be giving evidence against him too. --Marching on Leeds (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

More to move
During your moving of Talk:List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finals, you have not moved any of the sub-pages (E.g. Talk:List of UEFA Champions League finals/Archive 1). Please ensure you move all subpages along with the main page. Thanks. Aidan9382 (talk) 14:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Please also note your move has been contested, so make sure to establish why before moving said sub-pages. Thanks. Aidan9382 (talk) 14:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop misusing wikipedia
You removed an image from the article Gareth Bale because you felt there was no value in it.. however, that's a personal viewpoint, not a fact, you then went on the image, you saw that there was a deletion request (NOT A CONSENSUS), you clicked on the deletion page and you left a request for it to be deleted because again.. you felt there was no value in the image.. The image was marked for deletion because another user was unsure whether the image was mine or stolen.. it is NOT intended for disgruntled users to leave a negative vote on as a means of removing it from the site.

You wrongfully added that a wikipedia upload MUST have had 'public attention', which is absolutely ridiculous because wikipedia relies on copyright free content whether they are noteworthy or not, you're simply making assumptions as you go along just because you have a personal take on how articles should look.

If you continue to misuse this site, I will be reporting you. Hogyncymru (talk) 21:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and report me, I’ve done nothing wrong. You’re using Wikipedia to promote your own art, which otherwise has no public interest. Gareth Bale is the subject of that article, not your picture of him, no matter how good it is. – PeeJay 21:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I really do feel threatened by you, you're starting to harass me, please stop! Hogyncymru (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Peidiwch â gorymateb, hogyn! – PeeJay 23:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)