User talk:Peekarica

{|style="width:100%;margin-top:0px;background-color:#C60;border:1px solid #ccc"
 * style="width:56%;color:#021"|

Welcome to my Discussion page. Do you have an question? Take the time and ask me.

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page RMS Artanic has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8JmhBfSW08, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mScX_68zwXE. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Sarah Heuschen


The article Elizabeth Sarah Heuschen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject notable for only one event as per WP:EVENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --> Gggh  talk/contribs 22:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dennis Lamers


A tag has been placed on Dennis Lamers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  21:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear, it isn't my first article. I have been active on Wikipedia since 2008. The person in this article is not an fiction, but someone that makes movies in games. Thank you, all the best - Peekarica (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The deletion is a case of notability and not verifiability. You can add as many rererences as you want. Please read CSD A7. There is no reason why this boy is notable, and no reason why he deserves an article. Just because someone exists does not mean you should add them to an encyclopaedia. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  00:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Peekarica) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. As you have linked to your website multiple times and your userpage indicates you are the operator of the site, you are going to have to change your username or this account is going to be blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Every username I take is getting blocked. Like my previous username JetskiTradeCenter. I am getting started to piss off, and the fault on the user page was discovered yesterday. I forgot to change the url of the discussion page, since I copied and placed the page from my own Wiki. Also I am not advertising my website for more people, because it's already dead. Terrible last days of my life.... Peekarica (talk) 09:42, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry it is pissing you off, but I'm afraid your current name is a clear violation as it represents a website. You need to pick a new one and file a request at WP:CHU if you wish to continue editing with this account. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it able to let administrators change my name? Could Antares Andrews be a good name? Also I am very sorry for what I have done, it may sound like strange but I still have faith in RMS Olympic III. Todd deleted one of my pages (Lange Jan Lange Lies) which was a page that didn't deserve to be deleted. Is there a chance to get it back? It's about two "real" smoke stacks that stood in my city, nearly 34 years ago. Peekarica (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No, adminstrators can't change user names; but bureaucrats can. Take a look at the page Changing_username to start with. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  20:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I looked at your deleted page on the smokestacks, this content may be better suited for a section in the article on Heerlen, and only then if some sources are used to verify the content. If these smokestacks were as famous as the deleted article claimed t should be realatively easy to find those sources. You should also be aware that in the English language we do not refer to inanimate objects with gender-specific pronouns, so calling a smokestack a "he" is nonsensical in English. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)


 * It's been a week now and you still have not filed at WP:CHU for a new username. Please do so promptly. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of RMS Olympic III for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article RMS Olympic III, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/RMS Olympic III until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] I realize this all may seem a bit overwhelming, coming all at once like this. I want to be clear with you that I'm not trying to pick on you or anything, you just seem to have misunderstood or not been aware of some of out more important policies. There are an awful lot of rules here, but really there are only five core principles that all the other policies are based on. Click here to see them. I already explained about the username, another important point is verifiability. Your own self published website is not considered a proper source on which to base Wikipedia content. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

FINAL WARNING: Wikipedia is not for fictitious articles or hoaxes
I see you're continuing to create hoaxes and publish them on Wikipedia. You created RMS Artanic under your previous user which is now blocked, and now you're continuing to create hoaxes like RMS Olympic III and Lange Jan Lange Lies. The next time you create a hoax or add false information to Wikipedia, you will be indefinitely blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 16:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to File:Titanic 01a.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 16:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Good one Todd, Lange Jan and Lange Lies wasn't a god damn hoax. Do you really think that two smoke stacks were an hoax in my city? Go look up at the Dutch Wikipedia. The information I have put in there was from the Dutch Minemuseum. Now I lost one of my articles that didn't deserved to be deleted. Have a good day Todd, Peekarica (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC).

Userfied
I've restored the article you wrote to User:Peekarica/Lange Jan Lange Lies. If it's not one of your elaborate hoaxes, you can find reliable sources and add the cited content to Heerlen as Beeblebrox suggested. Toddst1 (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear Todd, I want to say sorry for all I did. But I can't declare Olympic III as an hoax, but on the other side I agree with you: Non reliable sources in Articles should be immediately removed. If the keel laying of Olympic III will be laid at minimum, will the article of Olympic III be returned? Thanks. Peekarica (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Listen Justin, there is, was, and will never be an Olympic III. It was a virtual Lego project some guy you are now ticked at was working on. Just, seriously stop trying to support Olympic III and stop impersonating Dennis Lamers. The Olympic III article will not be returned because, guess what... there are no actual plans for such a vessel! 1Matt20 (talk) 1:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I Haven't didn't do anything, and now you blame me for something I didn't? We will see what will happen in Argentina, I will laugh very hard if the news is published that the Olympic's keel laying will begin. Then I want to see how you comment then. Just wait and countdown till the spring of 2011. If Sarel Gous, Titanic, was nearly built in Harland and Wolff but of money problems it was cancelled. Then the Olympic should have a bigger chance. Please do not talk about something you can't proof. Peekarica (talk) 10:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Argentina is a really unlikely place to build a replica ocean liner. Your claimed plot line was a fake back story for Lamers's virtual project. Lamers even said you apologized to him for impersonating him, and how can you debunk his message on WikiPeekarica which states that you are impersonating him! I certainly can "proof" (as your horrendous grammar and spelling tells me) this! 1Matt20 (talk) 16:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You should stop act like a police officer to me. Just don't stalk and go away. Peekarica (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Peekarica, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Photo dennislamers.png


The file File:Photo dennislamers.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * }