User talk:Peepythefrog

Welcome!
Hello, Peepythefrog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Receptie123 (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Reverting the sentence
I'm going to be blunt here, so don't take any of this personally. I'm removing the remark about the "extreme rarity" of receiving multiple star reviews. I honestly don't feel like that sentence is very neutral or encyclopedic. For starters, what makes such a thing rare? Has anyone commented on the rarity of the multiple starred reviews other than yourself? It just feels like you're putting original research into the article and sort of being a little overly promotional at the same time. Believe it or not, while this doesn't happen with every book, it's actually not as extremely rare as the sentence makes it out to be. I've already covered the multiple positive reviews and I've commented in the reception section that the reception was overwhelmingly positive. This is really all that needs to be mentioned and anything other than this is sort of overkill at this point. I've asked another user to keep an eye on this situation and I'd really like to avoid this becoming a reversion war. I just really feel that the sentence isn't appropriate for the article and that it's just ultimately an unnecessary addition to the article. It's overkill.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)