User talk:PeggyKowal

Welcome!
Hello, PeggyKowal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 16:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fourth Reich— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 12:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Despite being asked not to disrupt Wikipedia, you immediately did so again. You are wasting your time, these additions will continue to be removed.


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. . --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

My first edit ...
My intention was not to be disruptive. This is the first time I have added anything to Wikipedia and I don’t really have a clue what I was doing and that should be taken into consideration. I’ve added a new edit which explains where the hypothetical comes from which should be OK please let me know if it is still considered ‘disruptive’ PeggyKowal (talk) 13:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is disruptive and has been deleted again. Please read wp:no original research and wp:reliable sources. The material you added looks like your own opinion, which is not how wikipedia works: any material must be based on sound evidence. You have not provided any credible and neutral evidence to support your addition and it would be contrary to the wikipedia synthesis policy to infer that a story written maybe 3000 years ago has any connection with a late 20th century conspiracy theory. Quotations from books of faith are generally not not accepted as evidence outside of articles dealing with that faith. Finally, Wikipedia is not a forum.


 * If you want more help, please look at help:Contents and/or create a new section here containing with a note to say what concerns you and someone who hasn't been involved in the cautions above will be along to advise. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please completely delete my Wikipedia account. I no longer wish to be a part of your site in anyway shape or form. Thank you PeggyKowal (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)