User talk:Pekffeintheda

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * In addition, pages related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed are subject to a one-revert restriction. An editor may not make more than one revert on any such page in a 24-hour period. For details, see WP:ARBPIA. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

I strongly suggest you undo your latest edit on NGO Monitor; otherwise you are likely to be blocked for having violated 1RR per WP:ARBPIA. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Guys, this sock is most likely dead already, he makes new accounts or gets new ips every day. Sepsis II (talk) 21:10, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fatah-Hamas conflict. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Do not engage in edit wars: read, understand and obey WP:3RR. When material is challenged or disputed, do not continue blanking content, but rather proceed to the talk page, start a new section, and begin a discussion to achieve consensus. Content and articles are not owned, and if you have a serious problem that is not resolved satisfactorily by consensus, then add the text  to your talk page and type your question below it, and someone will come and help you out as soon as possible, or you may elevate it more officially with WP:ANI.''  b e s i e g e d       talk 22:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.