User talk:Peking2017

Welcome!
Hello, Peking2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 14:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits. I've tweaked things a bit per Wikipedia style. A couple of references in your edits to Ultra-high-temperature metamorphism need a bit of clarification (# 39 & 41). Vsmith (talk) 14:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Subduction has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Subduction was changed by Peking2017 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871211 on 2018-10-02T09:48:03+00:00

Orogeny & Granite
Hi Peking2017, making major changes to articles such as orogeny and granite without prior discussion and no edit summaries is difficult to deal with. Your changes may well be improvements, but without any other information about where you're heading with them, it's difficult to assess. I reverted your changes to granite because I would like to understand your intent on an edit by edit basis, so that I don't have to spend a lot of time going through them all to check, as I will need to do at orogeny. It would be great if in future you provided more information when making changes. Thanks, Mikenorton (talk) 13:29, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Communication is required
Editing on Wikipedia is always a group effort. You need to leave wp:edit summaries explaining what you are doing, and you need to reply and/or acknowledge other's talk as above. See WP:Communication is required. Please communicate. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Continued making of major changes without edit summaries marked as minor
Please start by reading WP:Minor edit - you will see that edits should only be marked as such when making minor formatting, spelling or grammatical changes, not when making changes to content, so please stop doing that. Also, although they are not an absolute requirement when editing, edit summaries are definitely preferred as they assist other editors when assessing significant changes, so please start doing that. It is also good practice to explain what you're trying to do in an article when making major changes using the article talk page as it is extremely helpful. This is particularly true if your changes are reverted - if that happens it's time to discuss. Mikenorton (talk) 09:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)