User talk:Pelakonmalaysia

Welcome!
Hello, Pelakonmalaysia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sanpagan Sannasi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Whiteguru (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanpagan Sannasi


The article Sanpagan Sannasi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "See WP:TOOSOON ... is too soon in this fellow's career to merit an article. Reasons therefore are found here: WP:NACTOR ..."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Sanpagan Sannasi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanpagan Sannasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sanpagan Sannasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ASUKITE 03:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that in this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanpagan Sannasi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  15:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't know what your purpose was in removing all content from the page Articles for deletion/Sanpagan Sannasi, nor what your purpose was in making repeated attempts to move the page to draft space. However, whatever your intention was, the page should be left as it is, as a record of the discussion. Not only did your actions run the risk of making it difficult for editors to find the discussion, which naturally I hope you did not intend, but they also ran the risk of giving the impression that you were deliberately trying to hide the discussion to make it difficult to find; if editors get the impression that you are acting in such dishonest ways as that then you are likely to be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. In my message above I gave you the benefit of a doubt that I thought in fact hardly existed, but following that message by moving this talk page removed any remnant of doubt. JBW (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)