User talk:Pelican 8

April 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:James Chisholm (Rugby Union), from its old location at User:Pelican 8/sandbox/James Chisholm (Rugby Union). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Chisholm (Rugby Union) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Chisholm (Rugby Union). Thanks! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Chisholm (Rugby Union) (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pelican 8/sandbox/James Chisholm (Rugby Union) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Chisholm (rugby union) has been accepted
 James Chisholm (rugby union), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  23:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Marcus Smith
Hi there. Firstly, there really is no need for sarcastic comments like you made in this edit. Secondly, as per Wikipedia guidelines, content should be verifiable, and the burden of proof is with editors making changes to demonstrate verifiability. On the official Harlequins website (which is the reliable source used in the Harlequins article), Marcus Smith isn't listed in the senior squad, but in the academy squad. If you disagree with this, then please add additional verifiable sources to back up your changes. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 09:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi there. Since no attempt has been made to add any form of verifiable sources to the changes you've made, I will once again revert these. Thanks, TheMightyPeanut (talk) 13:44, 6 October 2017 (UTC)