User talk:Pellery/sandbox

Article Evaluation 2007 San Diego Chargers season

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? No the article is just full of people arguing about what can and cannot be in the article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? All of the information is of the past so it is pretty accurate but it also is contingent upon present day players. What else could be improved? Definitely the tone of voice used in the article is really boring. It should have a little sass to it. Evaluating tone Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is definitely not neutral because of nature of speculative comments. Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? There are many different viewpoints in the article so some are over represented and some are underrepresented.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Most of the citations have dead links but one link actually did work. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? No, each fact is not referenced in the citations also many other wikipedians have stated that most of the article is based off POV.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The conversations are all just about how various things stated in the article are not a proven fact. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is a B rating Pellery (talk) 17:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Paul