User talk:Pemberton Museum

June 2016
The page User:Pemberton Museum has been deleted, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. The page appeared to be an attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy, but more importantly it was a copy of content from another web site, probably contrary to copyright law, and certainly contrary to Wikipedia's copyright policy. Even if you work for the museum, it does not follow that you have the right to license content of its web site for free reuse by anyone in the world, for any purpose, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject only to attribution to Wikipedia: that is what you declare you are doing when you post content to Wikipedia. In the very unlikely event that the museum is willing to license its web content under such free terms, we need proof that it does.

Another important point is that your username implies that your account represents an organisation, not an individual person, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. If the account has been used by only one person, then you may if you wish request to have the name of the account changed to one which does not suggest it is a corporate account. Something like "Joanne at Pemberton Museum" would be acceptable, and would have the advantage of showing your connection to the museum. If you wish to do that, you can see how to do so at Changing username. Alternatively, you may just create a new account and abandon this one, and if more than one person has already used the account then the only acceptable procedure is to abandon the account and create individual accounts for each person who wishes to continue editing, as shared accounts are not permitted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)