User talk:Penarc

Image copyright problem with Image:Sj0051.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Sj0051.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Te ll y a ddi ct  11:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Baccharis linearis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ≈ The Haunted A n ge l  22:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Image licensing issues
You uploaded Image:Galldet.JPG, the license of which states that it is usable for non-commercial and/or educational uses only. However, according to Wikipedia's image policy, it is not usable as there is no restriction that Wikipedia content cannot be used for any other uses than whats specified. As a result, such images are deleted.

However, judging from the metadata of the image showing that it was taken by a personal digital camera, I am inclined to think that you may be the original creator of the image. If you are indeed the original author of the image, you may release it under a free license so that it may become usable here. In that case, you may replace the license section of the image with a free license like ).

If you are the creator of the image, please update the license soon, or else the image will be deleted. Thanks. -- soum  (0_o) 19:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Detail work
Thanks again for taking for taking the time to attend to picky details in articles (Hipólito Ruiz López). KP Botany 19:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Penarc. I'm glad I could help out. Thanks for adding the information. I wrote a lot of the English article on Hipólito Ruiz López, or more correctly I loosely translated the Spanish Wikipedia article. I meant to write on on Pavón as well, but couldn't find much information on line. I am not a botanist, but rather a historian. However, User:KP Botany, who wrote the original stub, is a botanist. You might want to contact him. I applaud your writing in another language. I read Spanish pretty well, but I would never be able to write an article for the Spanish Wikipedia. --Rbraunwa 02:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kork.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kork.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cryptocarya_alba2.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cryptocarya_alba2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Tsvet.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Tsvet.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Sophora
Hi Penarc - thanks for the note! If you have information on additional information with references on genus splits, please add it! - MPF 21:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Rhyniophyta
The image you added to this page was misidentified. It is an illustration of ''Aglaophyton major', which it not a vascular plant. older texts call this plant "Rhynia major", but more recent anatomical studies of material from the Rhynie chert have shown it contained no vascular tissue, so the plant was removed from both the genus Rhynia as well as from the Rhyniophyta. It is a polysporangiate bryophyte. --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Reiche
I looked at the article and added most of the information from the German and Spanish pages. Let me know if there was anything else you wanted to add. You can also check to make sure it is correct and the citations are correct (I assumed the ones from the Spanish page were correct). Rigadoun (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

No entendí
El mensaje anterior.--Domingo Portales (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * En mi página de inicio. Ya entendí, gracias--Domingo Portales (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Propolis references
Ola! :-) I have gone through the propolis article and done up the references. Cheers! Jon (talk) 08:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Morfoanatomia celula vegetal.png
Hi Penarc!

We thank you for uploading Image:Morfoanatomia celula vegetal.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joachim Grzega


The article Joachim Grzega has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Karthik Nadar (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Paul Hubertus Hiepko) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Paul Hubertus Hiepko.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tanja M.Schuster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanja M.Schuster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tanja M.Schuster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boneymau (talk) 23:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Boldine.PNG


The file File:Boldine.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Manuel Rojas S.jpg


The file File:Manuel Rojas S.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nothofagus truncata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colenso. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Flora ceylon20190424.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flora ceylon20190424.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nothofagus cunninghamii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anders Sandoe Oersted.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)