User talk:Penciuiulian99

September 2018
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Like a Stone, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 19:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Like a Stone, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Like a Stone. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at The One (Foo Fighters song). - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Admin needed
maybe you can convince this user to stop adding unsourced content over multiple articles. My warnings are doing nothing. Thank you, - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * See my warning below. None of these templates actually explain to a new user what the problem is. If they continue going forward, we can block. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry
Hi, I'm sorry you've been given a bunch of templates that are difficult to read and probably make no sense to you, but here's the short of it: music genres are for some reason a very controversial part of Wikipedia. I have no clue why, but that's the case. On Wikipedia, you are expected to cite sources before you add any information, including music genres. Because this area is so controversial, it is especially important to make sure you cite your sources, otherwise someone might report you to a noticeboard and you may get blocked. You can cite your sources using It's also important not to keep making an edit if some reverts you: if you keep doing this, it is the quickest way to get blocked.If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me, and I'll try to help. If you do continue adding unsourced genres, I'll unfortunately have to block you, so I really hope you take my advice here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 13:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Your recent editing history at Like a Stone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)