User talk:Pendulumswingsx

Eliseo Soriano
In case you have missed my responses to your message on my talk page, I suggest you visit there and read them. If you revert Eliseo Soriano again, you will be blocked from editing for a short time for vandalising Wikipedia. Moriori 22:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
Your were given fair warning about POV, but continued anyway, so I have blocked you from ediitng for 24 hours. You cannot include a claim someone is believed to be behind a smear campaign against someone else through publishing a series of pornographic comics unless you include reliable independent sources, in English, (this is enWiki). Moriori 08:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, I have replaced my original warning on this page which you removed. Please do not remove it again because it is significant in the history of your blocking. Moriori 08:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Im not saying they are behind it. I said "it is believed" because no one wants to admit to it. The comics has no publisher in it. It contains lies, fabrications and potoshopped pornographic image of Soriano in it. How can you not suspect the INC to be behind it when they are the ONLY group who urges it's members/viewers to buy it and they even know where to buy it. Pendulumswingsx 09:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello Pendulumswingsx. I have removed the block template. The article still has problems, and I will come back later today or tomorrow to fix it. If cites in English can't be found then the youTube refs will need to be removed. Also, linking to a blog written by Jane Abeo who has been a pro editor in this article is also not acceptable, and something will need to replace it or the info be removed. Moriori 02:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I will remove the Muslim youtube ref but I think the other youtube is acceptable because Soriano was speaking in English when he challenged the INC leader to a debate.Pendulumswingsx 07:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Could you please give summaries when you make edits. I have removed "out of context" which is POV if not cited. Also removed "when Manalo rejected the offer" for the same reason, and "aimed at inciting Muslims to attack Soriano" also for the same reason. I have also balanced the Soriano accusation that INC was behind the video by mentioning that INC issued libel proceedings against Soriano because of that statement. That info comes from the the reference site you gave. I notice you have just reverted, You will again be blco ked for removing pertinet information. Final warning. Moriori 20:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

you ignore the summaries that I gave? How is that neutral? It seems to me that you're an INC member trying to disguise as a "neutral" moderator to cover up their lies. This is crazy

and for you info. the blog is kinda biased because it paints a positive picture of the INC. They're not concerned about the poor. Manalo is a billionaire. I just gave the link since you're asking for a reference but it doesn't mean the entire contents are reliable. Its only half truth Madam.
 * Firstly, you have edited this article 37 times, and gave only 8 edit summaries, so there are few summaries to ignore. Secondly, I don't feel obliged to yet again explain my neutrality. Thirdly, you have yet again demonstrated that you do not like balanced editing. I asked for a reference, which you gave. On reading it, I saw there was further pertinent information which balanced that particular paragraph, so I added it to the article. You NOW say the link is biased, and may not be reliable so you remove it because it no longer suits your purpose. I am also removing the other link you gave, because it is not in English and you have previously been told that this is the English Wiki. Also, I have removed the info re debate being declined, because the reference you gave could not be accessed to support the information. I am blocking you from editing for a further period. If you disrupt Wikipedia again you will be blocked for a longer period, perhaps indefinitely. Moriori 02:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, you can restore all the Personal Blog links and INC references that suit your biases. I don't hold any grudge. Persecution is a part of Christian's life anyway!!!