User talk:Penelopepurr

March 2018
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to International Women's Day. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Peaceray (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to International Women's Day— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 18:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at International Women's Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. I am adding this level two warning because Qzd's warning was actually for the 2nd disruptive edit. Peaceray (talk) 18:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

No joke
I was not making a joke edit. It is a factual statement. Please replace my edit post hast. I will not tollerate discrimination based on political opinions. Wikipedia states statistics regarding violence against women and those stats are eronious. My edit was based on cold hard reality, not politucs or skewed stats and is a valid point. Penelopepurr (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Without verification from a reliable source, your statement constitutes original research, a point of view, or an opinion. Without a citation, your statement cannot be considered factual. Please familiarize yourself with Core content policies. Peaceray (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)