User talk:Penii

Welcome!
Hello, Penii, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Penii, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Penii


A tag has been placed on User:Penii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It's a user page, not a page actually about a subject.) --Penii (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ooer


A tag has been placed on Ooer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DanCherek (talk) 12:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion
Hello, Penii,

Do not tag any more pages for speedy deletion until you have reviewed Criteria for Speedy Deletion as you don't seem to understand what the criteria are and when they apply. You are a very new and inexperienced editor and you should not be passing judgment on what pages should be deleted until you gain more experience.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, CSD and the deletion process, please bring them to the Teahouse where veteran editors can help you with answers. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Penii, you didn't follow my advice. CSD G13 only applies to drafts that haven't been edited in six months. So, that would mean, today, drafts that haven't been edited since November 6, 2020. Please do not misapply deletion tags or you will be asked to not do any more speedy deletion tagging. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Penii, I see that User:Liz has warned you about this twice. Draft:Meme by khoobani clearly did not meet WP:CSD. At this point I would suggest you just stop tagging pages for speedy deletion, and focus your efforts elsewhere in the encyclopedia. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 08:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 00:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Unblock

 * You used the incorrect tag for Draft:Cats, and you had been warned before that you were using WP:G1 incorrectly and, at the same time, told to stop tagging articles for deletion completely. The speedy tags you removed were on pages you created. That is against policy, and I reverted them. Very few of your edits or actions have been constructive. I'm also frankly surprised that you got away with a user name like Penii, not to mention an apparent obsession you have with articles related to penises and other private parts. Finally, your userpage, which was deleted, mentioned Willy on Wheels, a known LTA, and it said you were here to vandlize Wikipedia; the rest of it was vulgar garbage.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The article duplicated cat and it also didn't make any sense, meaning that it didn't mean G3 yet met G1 and A10. I did not remove the tags on pages I created, if I did, someone hacked my account. There are tons of userpages that mention willy on wheels. (see [[File:Willys-Knight2020.jpg]] and its use.) Also, can I change my username? Btw, I only edited ONE page that had anything to do with penises. Also, even if you ignore this, an INFINITE block for ONLY ONE offense for VANDALISM? I've seen people get blocked for vandalism 5 times and the block was only 2 days.
 * You're correct about one thing: you removed speedy tags from two drafts, both of which had been created by IPs. Although technically that is permissible, it's not something a user with so little experience should do. However, you're wrong about the rest. You edited the following pages: Cock and ball torture, PENIS, Penis disease, Human penis, and Tiny penis. And, as I stated, you edited other pages about other private parts or sexual practices: Ass to mouth, BDSM, and Pussy. You also made this very bizarre edit: removing Willypedia and adding Penis pump. Related, as noted below, your decision to change the first name of a subject to "Semen" is all part of your trolling.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Semen Hitler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Semen Hitler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Semen Hitler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I only edited Cock and ball torture once, and I think this person is actually important. The stuff that was in the appeal above was completely false.
 * Well, looking at your edit history, especially April, shows that this isn't true. But I removed the mention of your name because the discussion should focus on the article. This article was already deleted via Articles for deletion/Semyon Hitler so I could have changed this to a CSD G4 but I think the AFD should proceed. Did you really think an article titled "Semen Hitler" wouldn't be scrutinized closely? Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)