User talk:PenmanM

Welcome!
Hello, PenmanM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Help me!
I have recently been working on the page for Osteopathy, as the current page is bias and inaccurate. When I edited I did not remove one 'side' of the debate, I just added some more balanced points, with evidence. I also added another perspective to give a more accurate portrayal of the profession But I have been told that some of my edits breach wikipedia conduct (I was careful to not be bias).

Qualification: Masters level university degree in Osteopathy, and currently practicing, and having led a discussion amongst 4400 Osteopaths online on the subject of the inaccuracy of the Osteopathy wikipedia page.

I am well aware of the nature of Wikipedia, and that it isnt to be used as 'advertising' and must be balanced - the current content of the page is slanderous and inaccurate.

Please help me with...

Allowing some of the changes that I an my peers make to not be immediately edited out

Thanks for your help

PenmanM (talk) 12:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This is definitely a discussion that needs to be on the talk page of the article in question, so that a) it reaches a larger audience, and b) that audience will contain people who are familiar with the subject content. If you want more help, change the help me-helped back into a help me, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 21:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)