User talk:Pennanochsvärdet

September 2019
Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Judiciary of Sweden, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Sjö. As you are a known politician, better not spoil the forum with last decades failed politics will you? Seriously only people born in the 1940:s believe such crap because of indoctrination and the then in judicial matters active Monarch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennanochsvärdet (talk • contribs)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Judiciary of Sweden. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Please see WP:V and WP:PRIMARY for starters. Your own interpretations and opinions aren't reliable sources. Some of your claims are exceptional and would require exceptional sources, in particular those saying that the judiciary is partial or politically controlled. ''Also, it is an accepted etiquette on the English Wikipedia to comment on the content, not the contributor. Ad hominem arguments aren't appreciated here, such as the one above or in the edit comment here.'' Sjö (talk) 06:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Judiciary of Sweden. ''You also added unsourced text to Human rights in Sweden. As I wrote above, verifiablity and proper sourcing is important on Wikipedia. I started a section at Talk:Judiciary of Sweden, you're welcome to discuss there. '' Sjö (talk) 10:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Human rights in Sweden. Dharmalion76 (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  02:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Swedish law in its original source states that "the peaceful enjoyment of property" is a "severe concern" in Sweden? Which law says so? I'm not asking what law you think is problematic, of course. Huon (talk) 22:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)