User talk:PenultimateStep

Block evasion
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of our blocking policy; "I have not impersonated another user, nor have I been prohibited from creating an account". Indeed you are prohibited from creating another account while your original account remains unblocked. If you wish to edit, you'll need to appeal the block on your original account. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 16:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

@User:Ohnoitsjamie How should I appeal this block when I don't have the password of my inital account? I never vandalised an article nor did I create sockpuppet accounts. Wikipedia will lose a good faith editor! At least I can proudly claim I'm not driven by any agenda or policy. --PenultimateStep (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * So this is the reward for countless hours of work. --PenultimateStep (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I just blocked one of your socks minutes ago, and will continue to do so unless you can convince the community to unblock you. Continuing to create socks while denying any wrongdoing is not a sound strategy for getting yourself unblocked. I'd suggest reviewing the WP:STANDARDOFFER. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:32, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I am just going to add one thing here. An editor who has used multiple accounts - but whose original account is locked to him due to having lost the password - can still appeal his block from an existing account provided he explains his circumstance, and that he will only use the account from which he is lodging his appeal, or certainly from the earliest one he can still log into to show he is making some form of effort. Where you're personally concerned, I will not personally throw my support behind an unblock for you at this stage. In the first place, the Prim96 account was blocked for disruptive behaviour. All right, the tag says "likely socking as well" but I won't take that as a premise. Then with later accounts which you don't deny, yes it emerged that sockpuppetry was the case, but no that was not why you were in the spotlight. The LJstats account was blocked originally for edit warring and a CIVIL breach whereby you told me where to go when removing my comment on your talk page. And months later, what do we have? This summary and post that was clearly intended as an insult. On that note, I'm just going to say one thing. As a Ukrainian, I love my country as much as the next person. But your "Glory to Ukraine" image extends its slava only to those who supported the Maidan and wish to see our country tied to the shackles of the Transatlantic power and economic structures, not to their opponents. I also believe your problem with Putin and Mladic has not so much to do with some unconditional acceptance on your part of what they are alleged to have done by your favoured regimes/news sources, but more what they have stood for which didn't fall into lockstep with the New World Order you seek to impose across the globe. So if you are thinking of making a clean break, you're not off to a good start with the way you've conducted yourself post-LJstats. This is my view; I am not an admin, and I don't speak for any admin. If you wish to try the appeal route, you're welcome. --Coldtrack (talk) 20:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)