User talk:Pep65497

Hi, I've reverted your edit to the Pensacola article. Among other problems, you removed sourced material. In general, removal of sourced material should not occur without a good reason and should be explained in detail on the talk page of the article. Since you are affiliated with the school, I strongly suggest you read our conflict of interest policy and propose changes to the article on the article talk page and get a consensus before implementing them. Also, please be careful of Wikipedia's three revert rule. JoshuaZ 04:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Pensacola Christian College
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Kralizec! (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Please discuss specific issues on Talk:Pensacola Christian College. If there is a particular part that you think is insufficiently sourced, then spell it out. Also, note that if you revert again, you will be reported for 3RR. And again, please read the conflict of interest policy. JoshuaZ 04:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Kralizec! (talk) 04:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on March 1 2007 to Pensacola Christian College
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 22:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)