User talk:Pepacik

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Botulinum toxin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Botulinum toxin was changed by Pepacik (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-07-02T11:41:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Pepacik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Vaginismus. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  20:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Hello! In the vaginismus article you replaced a Cochrane review with a citation to primary research describing a single study. Per WP:MEDRS, Wikipedia favors reviews of literature over the results of a single study, so I reverted what you did. If you have something more to say about why you think the Cochrane review ought to be replaced then please share at talk:Vaginismus and please also post at WikiProject Medicine to alert others to join the discussion. Thanks.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  20:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
 Blue Rasberry  (talk)  14:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)