User talk:Pepamarkovac007

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mauritius Blue Pigeon was changed by Pepamarkovac007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956416 on 2013-01-02T21:39:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bratislav Punoševac with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bratislav Punoševac with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Predrag Pupovac


A tag has been placed on Predrag Pupovac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 22:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Predrag Pupovac
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Predrag Pupovac. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Predrag Pupovac, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi Pepamarkovac007, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at Predrag Pupovac to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

== Just come up with one source ==

and I'll withdraw the CSD on Predrag Pupovac - I cannot find any references to him whatsoever. On the Serbian FA site, either club website there is nothing about him. NtheP (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Forget it, you'rer obviously just messing about. NtheP (talk) 23:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Predrag Pupovac for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Predrag Pupovac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Predrag Pupovac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregJackP  Boomer!   23:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Predrag Pupovac


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Predrag Pupovac, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It covers a topic on which we already have an article - :. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at :, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)