User talk:Pepelux71

Your submission at Articles for creation: ScoresPro (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:ScoresPro.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Pepelux71 Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ScoresPro


A tag has been placed on Draft:ScoresPro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:ScoresPro (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. . ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Pepelux71 Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:78.26&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

78.26  (His Wiki's Voice) 16:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Talkback
78.26  (His Wiki's Voice) 13:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

draftscorepro
I am not convinced that the company meets the notability guidelines, but leaving that to one side, nearly all the text consists of unsourced claims about the product phrased in a promotional tone, such as  What makes this method special. However, I take the point that the article is still under review, so I've restored and added it to my watchlist. In my view it needs much more improvement than the reviewer is suggesting to avoid speedy deletion at a future date Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * And another admin has deleted it. I think you just have to accept that it is nowhere near neutral enough in its current form. I can sandbox the deleted text for you if you want to try to deal with problems out of the line of fire Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:42, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your explanations. Kindly drop it in sandbox if possible. Pepelux71 (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)