User talk:Pepole made

Welcome!
Hello, Pepole made, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamed Zarei, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamed Zarei, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please participate in the AfD process. Attempting to disrupt the process by removing the template on the page [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamed_Zarei&diff=666654399&oldid=666643570] and blanking the AfD discussion page [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hamed_Zarei&diff=666654572&oldid=666643568] is not a proper way of addressing the concerns raised by the AfD nomination. Please make a policy based argument to keep the article on the AfD page. Thank you for your understanding.'' J bh  Talk  18:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

sorry but my article is cerditable and I dont want do delete this ariticle Help me what i most do? @Jbhunley


 * Find some more reliable sources to show why they're actually notable, see Identifying reliable sources for guidance. Also, you can participate in the discussion at Articles for deletion/Hamed Zarei. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Is Nature a reliable sources? @Jbhunley I have Farsdm.com Page on my profile its persian I can read persian if I Translate this page for you is this reliable sources?@Jbhunley
 * Nature is a reliable source however it depends on what the article says and what you want to use it for. The best thing to do is use the source to improve the article and let others take a look. Also, it looks like you are new to using talk pages. Here is a brief introduction that might help User:Jbhunley/How to edit talk pages. J bh  Talk  19:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Also sources not in English are fine. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * :You should read WP:PROF to know what Wikipedia's notability guidelines for academics and professors are. Generally an associate professor will not qualify however there are exceptions. J bh  Talk  19:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

OK Thank You for your help if I translate the Farsdm.com and send for you will my article delete?@Jbhunley
 * Right now the article is being considered for deletion by the community. I just nominated it, the final decision is not mine or any single editor's. Several editors will comment over the next 7+ days until a consensus forms on whether to keep or delete the article, or until it becomes obvious no consensus will form. You might want to read WP:AFD and read some other AfD discussions to get an idea of the process. The best thing you can do is continue to improve the article with reliable sources and show how the subject meets our general notability guidelines or our notability guidelines for academics. You should state gow the article meets these guidelines as a Keep statement at Articles for deletion/Hamed Zarei. I will keep your talk page on my watch list and you can leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions during this process. J bh  Talk  19:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

please dont delete this article. I need some time for translate. please give me some time.@Jbhunley

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Hamed Zarei. ''As explained above, do not remove articles for deletion tags. Instead, please feel free to work on improving the article, and contributing to the discussion at Articles for deletion/Hamed Zarei.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Hamed Zarei. J bh Talk  10:47, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Continuing to remove AfD after final warning. J bh Talk  10:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * AIV might have been a better venue, but regardless:

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly removing Articles for deletion templates, as you did at Hamed Zarei. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Yunshui 雲 水 11:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Hamed Zarei. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Hamed Zarei. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Are you a Administrator?
 * No, but I'll find one if you removed that deletion tag again. Why? Joseph2302 (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hamed Zarei. ''Not the way to get an article protected. Stop changing the date on the protected lock, it has zero effect.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 23:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 23:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)