User talk:PeppermintGlow

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seventeen (band) has been accepted
 Seventeen (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! E. Lee (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:PeppermintGlow help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Guest appearance
Don't avoid my question, since when a wiki talk has become a wiki rule such that you can enforce it on everyone? --H2254625 (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I wasn't avoiding your question as much as waiting for you to do your own research. As it is, please take careful consideration when reading WP:DUE and WP:PROPORTION. It should be extremely obvious after reading these that brief appearances on TV shows - of which there will be many in an idol's career and none of particular value to their overall life and career - are not in proportion with the article and, to be published on the Wikipedia article in question, would then be given undue weight. Both of these lead to a compromise in WP:NEUTRAL. I would also strongly recommend you thoroughly study the entirety of WP:HTRIVIA. Your proposals would be akin to every appearance of Rihanna on The Ellen Show or other miscellaneous talkshows being noted in her Wikipedia page - which is something we do not allow because it is messy and of no value to the average reader. Wikipedia is not a resume filled with trivialities, and it is not a fanboard, it is an encyclopedia. For more on this you can see WP:NOT, WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY. Many other online encyclopedias to not adhere to Wikipedia's strict rules regarding what is important information for the reader and what is not. Information otherwise considered trivial here may be of great value there. I hope this has helped you.
 * Hello, again, you are making up you own original conclusion. You all concluded the "best practices" from the real policies in a talk page and expect everyone else to follow. You can't not enforce the talk page. Period. On the other hand, that article doesn't even fall under the need of clean up. --H2254625 (talk) 02:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm not going to continue arguing with you about this. I've provided you with sources regarding the actual policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Whether you choose to adhere to these policies or not is up to you. Have a good day.PeppermintGlow (talk) 15:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)