User talk:Pepperpotts

August 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pepper Potts. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 06:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your draft article, Draft:Ding Dong Dilly Whipper


Hello, Pepperpotts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ding Dong Dilly Whipper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fifty Seven


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Fifty Seven, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –– Formal Dude  (talk)  02:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

About <>
regarding Fifty Seven & Billy Joel usually the song content are summarized like Tsugunai (song), not wholesale copy of the entire lyrics which are obviously not Fair use.

also tone are quite informal unlike Formal writing in printed encyclopedia in the past, not sure if these edits are allowed to be in these books (WP:Encyclopedic style), and Fifty Seven would probably be deleted WP:AFD --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Wow very fast intervention --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)