User talk:Peppylemew

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Eels (band) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/eels, http://www.myspace.com/eels (redirect from http://www.myspace.com/eels)). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Deleting info
Hello If you keep on deleting soured and relevant information, it will keep on being reverted. I suggest that you post on a talk page why you think this material should be deleted; you will have much better success that way coming up with a draft that satisfies as many editors as possible. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Still It seems like the only purpose you have on Wikipedia is deleting information from Eels articles. As I have tried to explain, this is not acceptable (especially with sourced information that is credible, relevant, and verifiable.) If you want to amend an article, you are free to do so, but persistently deleting information will not be an effective strategy to enhance the quality of the articles. You might want to post on a talk page to discuss why you think this information should be deleted or tag articles if you think they are deficient. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * One last time Simply put, your edits to delete sourced information and remove all categories from an article are in violation of Wikipedia's policies. If you persist in doing this, I will report this behavior to an administrator and it is possible that you will be banned or blocked. I've tried to reason with you about why you should post to talk pages or provide sources of your own, but you are being insistent on simply deleting information without any apparent cause. If you want to change anything on Wikipedia, you are free to do so, just as I am free to change it back. If you want your changes to last, you will have to seek consensus about how to strengthen the article rather than simply deleting what you don't like and refusing to communicate with anyone. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - F ASTILY  ( T ALK ) 21:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to End Times (album). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Catgut (talk) 21:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Addendum Please see here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:46, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring at Bad Dude in Love


Hello Peppylemew. As you've been notified above, your actions are being discussed by administrators at WP:AN. The edit history of Bad Dude in Love shows a constant string of removals by you, over a dozen since November. (The article gets shorter every time you edit). You have never left an edit summary or a talk comment. If you won't follow our policies, it is likely that you will be blocked for edit warring. If you wish to continue editing Wikipedia, you should respond to the complaints and promise to stop this practice. EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Reported at edit warring noticeboard
here. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC) for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please explain your position at Talk:Bad Dude in Love and Talk:End Times (album). Continually reverting without discussion is disruptive edit warring. - 2/0 (cont.) 06:32, 25 December 2009 (UTC)