User talk:Pepto65~enwiki

List of climbers
If you are interested in any information related to high asia mountaineering, just ask Eberhard Jurgalski the leading chronicler and statistician of world mountaineering. There is no need to correct his data. Pepto65 (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * There's actually a need for verifiable and reliable sources. --Damiens .rf 22:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I fully agree. Would you be so kind, as to share your sources with me, as I did?Pepto65 (talk) 23:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources for what information? --Damiens .rf 12:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * e.g. for Gerlinde Kaltenbrunners summits, where in the List of climbers have been 8 summits, which I corrected to the actual value 11, (see also Gerlinde Kaltenbrunner and given references) and you at last altered to 9 without any given verifiable and reliable source. Be sure, I am neither interested to play ping pong nor I want to spam articles with unreliable sources. In my opinion, it will stay a conflict anyway, if you want to be actual with the number of summits in any article on one side, and have verifiable and reliable sources on the other side. A way out of this dilemma could be a generally accepted and as reliable known person or organisation, which offers such 8000er statistics. This is, what I and many others know about Jurgalski, his history and his reputation, but if you can offer any other more actual, more reliable, and/or international better known source, I would be happy, to learn more about. Pepto65 (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I never really added any new info to that article. All I did was to add an sources tag and revert newly added unsourced info. In a month or two, I'll start removing all remaining unsourced information. I'm just not doing this right now because I would have to blank the whole article. --Damiens .rf 14:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my fault. It was User:Ww2censor, who did this. But anyway, what do you think would be a way to get actual informations from reliable sources and refer them? The alternative to have outdated information or really a blank article, does not seem very attractive to me. I am not really wikipedia experienced at all and therefore plain interested in knowing your point of view. Pepto65 (talk) 14:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * We could get information from published books (except self-published or print on demand publications), established news magazines, etc. See Reliable Sources for what is considered good sources for Wikipedia. --Damiens .rf 16:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Pepto65. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Pepto65~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)