User talk:Peratflexibilityenvelopecom

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Self-Reconfiguring Modular Robotics has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://evolverobotics.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Ensemble Axiom


The article The Ensemble Axiom has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Nominated for deletion as original research, a neologism, and lack of notability. Online searches reveal very few possible sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 23:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I have removed the deletion notice as the reason for doing so, stated as: "No original research, "a neologism ", "lack of notability", as well as the written comment " Online searches reveal very few possible sources " are not relevant. I explain why I think they are not below.

In the following it is important to remember that this is a new but growing area within robotics research. It was technically established by John von Neumann in 1949 with his paper on cellular automaton but it started to grow significantly in the late 1980's with the work of Toshio Fukuda, Mark Yim and many more.

This page is not "No original research" it is a summary of an important concept in research, as are most axioms.

This page is not a "Neologism" the word and concept is is new as explained above, but neither the page nor the concept is attributable to any singular person.

This page does not "lack of Notability" the axiom is created and used in publications by several leading and highly respected researchers, as shown in the references. it is also my humble opinion that it will be useful and widely used when presenting this area to the general public over the coming 10-15 years when the area matures out of research and enters wider, public use.

The statement that "Online searches reveal very few possible sources" is correct, but it is also natural given the above.

I have added this explanation both to my talk page

Speedy deletion nomination of CL3 Generation Movement


A tag has been placed on CL3 Generation Movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cntras (talk) 04:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

CL3 Generation Movement
Hello. Thank you for your message. In order to qualify for an encyclopedia article, a subject must be "notable". Please see WP:Notability. When the CL3 Generation Movement satisfies the notability criteria based on what has been written about it in independent reliable sources, you are welcome to write a new article about it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)