User talk:Percentol/Urethral hypermobility

Peer Review
Hi @Percentol,

Great job, this is a nice article that covers the topic of urethral hypermobility well. I don’t think you will have to change much for your final article. My main suggestions are to add an image of the anatomy, add your in-text citations to more phrases, and link some additional terms. Also checking for any stray capital letters before submitting would be good as some of the linked phrases are still capitalized. I detailed my thoughts and suggestions below, but I really think you did a nice job with this and most of the odds and ends are things that will probably self-resolve as you do your final edits anyways.

Cirqueduchat (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Readability: I used one of the readability calculators on our course page and that estimated that the average grade level needed to comprehend the text is between 16-17 which seems like an appropriate level in my opinion. You also linked some of the more difficult terms to other articles which could theoretically improve readability beyond the calculator's estimation as well.

Adherence to topic: Great adherence to topic, you remained concise and did not stray from the matter at hand. All information is relevant to the article.

Organization and flow: Nice lead and sectioning. Headings and subheadings are well-chosen and relevant.

Images/figures: It might be helpful to add an image of the structures at least in the anatomy section to help readers orient themselves.

Citations: Would recommend adding your in-text citations to some of the areas without citations currently, however this is probably just because we are still working on the articles.

Source quality: Reviewing your reference list it seems like you have chosen good sources that fit the Wikipedia guidelines for medical writing. I didn’t see any primary literature and you had some good review articles listed for your topic. I do see one red area under your 5th citation, if you have the time it might be good to see if you can fix this error message.

Bias: I didn’t pick up on any bias while reading this, it seems objective and gives the reader a neutral review of the topic.

Misc:

I would recommend the following

-Under “male anatomical considerations” – “prostatectomy is one risk factor for urethral…”

-Under Treatment, could add that Duloxetine is an SNRI and link SNRI. I would also consider rewording some of the “surgery” section specifically the third sentence which reads a little repetitive with the word “mesh”. Could also link “urethral bulking”, “mid-urethral sling” if there are pages for it.

-Under future research, could link “stem cell therapy” Cirqueduchat (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)