User talk:Percigator

List of whistleblowers article
Hey, I've tweaked the Percival entry on the list article. It really should be a short summary of the situation with the main details being in the linked article (United States Investigations Services in this case). I also cut the references down to just the one that is needed. You used a reference to documentcloud.com - that's generally not considered a reliable source. Like other document upload sites, there's not much guarantee that the document hasn't been altered. Please note that I'm not saying or suggesting that anything like that has happened, but for Wikipedia, references need to meet our reliable source policy. Thanks. Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

USIS (company) vs United States Investigations Services
I just noticed that these two articles are about the same company. I think you had created the second one. As it looks like both pages are for the same company, my suggestion would be to add any missing information to the USIS (Company) article and change the United States Investigations Services article to a redirect. Changing it to a redirect is really easy - see this page on how to create a redirect. My main reason for using the USIS page is this is much simpler since you just created the other page and are the only editor. Going the other way is harder to do for attribution and history reasons, plus it looks like that's the current name of the company. Let me know if you need any help - I've got your talk page watched so I'll see any response. Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)