User talk:Peregrine Fisher/Archive 19

Help editing Michael Deibert article
For some time now, I have been trying to clean up a low-importance article on the American journalist and author Michael Deibert but a user registered as Context23 keeps vandalizing it. Chiefly, Context23 continues to link to what I believe is highly contentious and possibly libelous material in the form of an article attacking Deibert by a Haitian politician named Patrick Elie (one of Deibert’s specialities appears to be Haiti) in a website I have never heard of before. I researched Elie and found that he evidently has a history of making false claims (on his website, Deibert links to articles chronicling how Elie spent time in prison for falsely claiming to be a diplomat and using a false address on a federal firearms transaction in connection to some sort of apparent assassination plot), so I am very worried that this link goes several steps beyond Wiki’s no-libel policy. There is already one article linked to critical of Deibert’s writing (which appear the point of the creation of the Context23 account) and that article falls within Wiki’s standards. However, I find the second article - the one that Context23 continuously links to - and another one linked to by someone named Diana Barahona that accuses Deibert of libel - do not. Thoughts? Thank you for taking time to help with this! Just trying to make Wiki a better community for all concerned! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MultiWorlds (talk • contribs) 11:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Re help editing Michael Deibert article
First of all I have to admit that the frequency of my edits in the past 24 hours has been excessive, I do understand that and will refrain from making such frequent edits in any articles in a given 24 hour period.

In regard to the Michael Deibert article on Wikipedia: Wikipedia user Multiworlds has repeatedly deleted references with links to newspaper articles documenting the massive amount of criticism Deibert's journalism has received, especially where it pertains to his reporting on Haiti.

The differential edits do show my high frequency editing, but also serve to document that both the edition to the article as well as the references used, stay very well within the scope of user guidelines for wikipedia, and that any disputes should have been resolved on the discussion page. That of course includes me, which I must also admit that previously, I had not laid out my reasons for the edits with due diligence as could have been hoped for. I do realize that the need for discussion is implicit, but it should come from all sides involved in the editing process in order to result in Wikipedia articles that are of any value.

The range of Michael Deibert's vociferous critics includes among others Haitian, Canadian and U.S. activists for example a former Haitian government official in several administrations, political activist and writer: Patrick Elie, as well a plethora of journalists from the Caribbean nation and abroad such as Justin Podur: [see: A dishonest Case for a Coup : part of a dialogue with the writer Michael Deibert].

Many newspaper articles, blog entries and and other written material attest to the not inconsequential amount of negative attention Deibert has garnered. The criticism, ranging from the very well documented and researched to perhaps more deceptive claims, gives strong evidence that any objective article about Deibert should mention both the quantitative as well as qualitative discussions Michael Deiberts book and articles have engendered. It is not within the scope of the Wikipedia/Deibert article to examine all claims, may they be proven or unproven, in regard to the journalistic merits of Michael Deibert's journalistic skills, instead, in order to have any merit, it is imperative that the article examines both any positive as well as negative connotations being associated with Deibert's media contributions.

The claim that articles that were linked to by me are potentially libelous is especially spurious in light of the fact that Mr. Deibert very frequently uses the accusation of libel in his comments and articles [see for example the numerous comments the writer leaves in public forums.

Deibert's journalism has included allegations of child sacrifice: ["The charges culminate with Deibert’s uncritical reiteration of a gang leader’s claim, from his Florida exile, that a baby missing from a Port-au-Prince hospital had been kidnapped by So Anne and murdered in a vodou ritual to strengthen Aristide." by a well known Haitian activist, Annette Auguste a.k.a. Sò Anne [see: Amnesty International ]

Some of the media's claims against Deibert may be libelous, but in much the same fashion as his spurious and undocumented claims of child sacrifice in Haiti, just to stay with one example. No one has ever brought any allegations of this sort before a court in Haiti or abroad and no documents of verifiable testimony exist to make these claims any less absurd as they are even on superficial examination, given the well documented track record of of Annette Auguste as a community activist singer and grass roots activist in both Brooklyn, NY and Haiti.

Furthermore Vodoun, the main religion of Haiti that Deibert implicates as being involved in child sacrifice in the case of Anette Auguste, is not mentioned in academic literature as being involved in human sacrifice which is not prevalent in contemporary Haiti.

Given the facts at hand: that Michael Deibert has made several highly defaming cklaims, to date unverified or backed up with primary research materials, it should not be considered potentially libelous to include articles into the Wikipedia/Deibert article that merely serve to illustrate the contentiousness of his writing. None of the changes to the "Michael Deibert" article as edited by me, contain anything that could be construed as defamatory or libelous.

The article is very one-sided in its current form and mainly reads like a public relations piece about the author. Without any references providing a more balanced viewpoint, the article merely mirrors the authors own web-pages and has no encyclopedic value.

comment added by: User: Context23 (talk) 01:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your comment, I did find your talk page after User Multiworlds started deleting multiple times on my talk page and also deleted content I had posted in the Michael Deibert article over 16 times without much any discussion. Since I was unable to have a constructive talk with Multiworlds, I thought responding to Multiworlds' comments on your talk page might at least lead to a dialogue. I hope that was o.k.. Context23 (talk) 02:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It's fine. It's just that I don't do much wikipedia anymore.  I'm not sure why that other user decided to talk to me.  Hopefully someone will deal with it at the noticeboard. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 02:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:James Toofer Spurlock from 30 Rock.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:James Toofer Spurlock from 30 Rock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File:How to add an image.ogv
That image has been nominated for deletion. 123.24.96.94 (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Willamette River
Hello. Thanks for your comments at the closed FAC of Willamette River, Featured article candidates/Willamette River/archive1. I wanted to know if you had any more comments about how the article could be improved, as I am preparing for a peer review or a second FAC once the time comes. Any feedback on the talk page is vital to the article's future. Thanks so much. Jsayre64  (talk)  19:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * No comments right now, but I'll keep an eye on the situation. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * There's now a second FAC open here. Jsayre64   (talk)  17:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

HELP!
We have an editor named —  Legolas  ( talk 2 me )]who is taking ownership of an article and not allowing ANY collaboration. Editor is trolling [[W.E (film) and is taking ownership of the article. As you can see, I have tried to make helpful edits and instead of taking it to the discussion page, Legolas has first tried to claim "plagiarism" and then "vandalism", threatening to have me blocked when I have been polite and courteous. please help. Thanks(talk) 16:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, Peregrine. I've taken care of this by asking for a third opinion. Jsayre64   (talk)  17:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. Good luck. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Re:Talk page edits
Dear User:Peregrine Fisher, thanks for your advice. I appreciate it. I'll consider archiving at a later date. With regards, AnupamTalk 01:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear User:Peregrine Fisher, that might be a hard habit to break! Also, thanks for the compliment. That really means a lot. My concern is that if the article is made a dab, the content will no longer be relevant to the other articles, which often discuss different subject matter, since all of the references I found in the article explicitly use the phrase "militant atheism." In fact, if you look at the article, every single citation has the original quote from the author in it and uses this phrase specifically. Nevertheless, thanks for participating in the discussion there. All the best to you! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't edit your post. You should say "I meant..." in the future.  It's just the wiki way, I guess.  God bless. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 02:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * God bless you too, AnupamTalk 02:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hey, you ole rascal. Long time, no wiki. I have a new name...used to be Carmarg4. I'm still reading my way thru the presidents. I am currently busy ruining William Howard Taft. Hope you are well.Hoppyh (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Very cool. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Awesome
Thanks for the karma! Visitor7 (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Clarify comments on User talk:Spidey104
Hello. Spidey seems to think that in your comments on his talk page meant that he was right and that the pages shouldn't be redirected. I got the impression that you felt the redirects were valid, but you just wanted to make sure I was doing it for the right reason. Can you please clarify your opinion? JDDJS (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Neither person is right. The articles probably could be sourced, which means keep, but they probably never will be, which means redirect.  It's basically just personal preference. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 00:28, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. JDDJS (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Occupy Portland
Keep up the great work! Sorry for removing your source--I was essentially starting the article from scratch (since, at the time, there was enough unsourced content) and collecting sources on the talk page (OPB included). Of course you are more than welcome to continue expanding and improving the article. Feel free to strike a source on the article's talk page if you feel as much info as possible has been extracted. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * OK! - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey there!
Definitely missed having you around. :) I know Drilnoth has been editing for a while again as well, and he is occupied with other stuff. I've been thinking of "getting the band back together" - see the wikiproject talk page for some interim ideas I had. Lately I've been putting a lot of work into rewriting the Orcus page. BOZ (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

wt:n
Thanks - I didn't get any edit conflict warning so I have no idea what happened there, but I restored your original comment and added mine to it. --M ASEM (t) 05:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * No worries. It was probably something funky about the cache. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Marvel Animated Universe
Template:Marvel Animated Universe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Dispute Resolution
You may be interested in this. Peter jackson (talk) 11:02, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:One Tree Hill (TV series)
Hello, Peregrine Fisher, would you mind commenting on the above linked discussion when you get a chance...since it has to do with a comment you made at the Reliable sources/Noticeboard and since you have experience with getting articles to GA status? Flyer22 (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

An opinion, if you might...
I'd like you to take a look at User:MichaelQSchmidt/Take This Lollipop and tell me if you think it's ready for mainspace. To be Frank, once I began the thing practically wrote itself.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Seems like you already decided. Anyways, nice work. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well... I did request input from some others... and used their comments to improve it. Neat film. Creepy. Causes one to think.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Television episode and season articles badly needed
Because of the high number of edits that you have made at Wikipedia talk:Television episodes, I would like to call your attention to a list of the most critically acclaimed episodes and season articles that need to be created: TV-EPISODE.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

War of Souls
Because you have recently participated in AFDs regarding Dragonlance, I am alerting you that War of Souls is up for deletion. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 04:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

User:EEMIV
Special:Contributions/EEMIV. 500 edits
 * Redirects without discussion
 * Actions against consensus of discussion
 * Subversion of AfD process
 * Use of redirects to bypass the AfD process
 * EEMIV seems to think that mentioning proposals at the Star Trek project page gives rights superseding the AfD process. So I guess that makes the others at that project page complicit in this as well. I have seen this sort of behaviour before, but it has always been isolated incidents. This user does it habitually, and seems to have the backing of other editors as well. I think a message needs to be sent, that nowhere in WP:REDIRECT does it say that redirects are what you do with articles you do not like and cannot be bothered to nominate for deletion, or that you think might have a chance of being improved later (as many and various guidelines and essays indicate that stubs are for that purpose).

After the decision to Keep by closer, User:Ron Ritzman, at:
 * Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambush (Star Wars: The Clone Wars)

Wholesale redirect of a series of Star Wars The Clone Wars episodes to a list of episodes, against consensus, and without further discussion
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hostage_Crisis&diff=362738005&oldid=362702487

Keeps no record of archives on talk page. He has his TALK PAGE locked so only Users can edit it.
 * Redirects

Plo Koon, redirected to List of Star Wars characters
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plo_Koon&diff=488578144&oldid=488576242
 * Talk page. Proves he is not doing redirects for the purposes of WP:REDIRECT #13 : "Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.)"
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APlo_Koon&diff=488578097&oldid=477058778

Redirect (two of many, of Star Trek spaceship articles
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Starfleet_ship_registry_and_classes_in_Star_Trek&diff=484220024&oldid=482393620
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Excelsior&diff=482409508&oldid=478713241


 * Stubifying, outside of the Star Trek genre

Tropes in Agatha Christie's novels. Made Stub of article.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropes_in_Agatha_Christie%27s_novels&diff=483753776&oldid=478348348

I stopped after less than a week's worth of Edit History. There is no telling how much material this user has removed from mainspace
 * Copies of this message sent to editors who participated in the Ambush AfD: User:Ron Ritzman, User:DGG, User:Jclemens, User:Peregrine Fisher, User:Torritorri, and added to the Talk page of the Star Trek Project page, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek
 * Anarchangel (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Spooky.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Spooky.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Deceit module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Deceit module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Dreams module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Dreams module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Truth module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Truth module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Triumph module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Triumph module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of War module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of War module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mists of Krynn module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mists of Krynn module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World of Krynn module cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:World of Krynn module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Witch wendy comic2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Witch wendy comic2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Plastic little dvd cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plastic little dvd cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Rizelmine s01e01.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rizelmine s01e01.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Ultimate X-Men 40 Cover.jpg
Can you help me? --Ultimate Anna (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Just a heads up: Ultimate Anna is very likely a sock of the indefinitely blocked Shawnee Smith/Hawnee94. They do know how to upload image to Wikipedia, they just don't get the non-free content policies. They have also uploaded the same image to commons to try an circumvent the policies here. Lastly, they started out on the Russian Wikipedia with the same focus and seem to have had similar trouble there

- J Greb (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
—David Levy 04:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Headlights (slang)


The article Headlights (slang) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Headlights (slang) – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G. C. Hood (talk) 23:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Ramona Quimby merger proposal
Hello. There's a merger proposal relating to an article or articles you've contributed to, relating to the Ramona Quimby books. You are invited to read about and discuss it here: Talk:Ramona (novel series). Thank you. Tlqk56 (talk) 00:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Yukio (comics).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yukio (comics).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Chthon (comics).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chthon (comics).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * Thanks guys. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 20:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Scrapped Princess s01e04.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Scrapped Princess s01e04.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Asgardian_appeal
Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  00:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Delphine Chanéac
I saw your post in the FP talk page from 2010 and found the image gorgeous. So with some slight adjustments, this was your idea: Featured picture candidates/Delphine Chanéac. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 05:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Good luck. If it passes, tell me here if you don't mind. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I will. Off to a rough start (it's black and white). – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 18:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Didn't pass. :( Cheers! – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 07:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Funkytown by Lipps Inc.ogg)
Thanks for uploading File:Funkytown by Lipps Inc.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

Orphaned non-free media (File:Downtown by Petula Clark.ogg)
Thanks for uploading File:Downtown by Petula Clark.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 10:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Anderson three avong1127.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Anderson three avong1127.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Absolute employment


The article Absolute employment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Dicdef, no sources for 7 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Absolute employment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Absolute employment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Absolute employment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eureka season 1 episode 12.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Eureka season 1 episode 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ribsy cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ribsy cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fight Back to School 3 DVD cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fight Back to School 3 DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:What About Brian cast photo with Polly Shannon as Marjorie.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:What About Brian cast photo with Polly Shannon as Marjorie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Erdely Discussion
A discussion in which you may be interested is occurring here. BlueSalix (talk) 03:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Article Split Proposal
A discussion in which you may be interested is occurring here. BlueSalix (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Gunfight film poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:A Gunfight film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Replies to Your Question: Being Charlie is broken
Skyllfully (talk &#124; contribs) 06:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate X-Men 75 Cover art.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate X-Men 75 Cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate xmen cover 002.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate xmen cover 002.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 18:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks. You too. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 00:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crimson and Clover by Tommy James and the Shondells single cover.ogg.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Crimson and Clover by Tommy James and the Shondells single cover.ogg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following http://goo gl/forms/ZyYQm6uu7e form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Pseudodragon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pseudodragon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pseudodragon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tezuka cinematographic.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tezuka cinematographic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate X-Men 40 Cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate X-Men 40 Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

New York TImes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New York TImes. Since you had some involvement with the New York TImes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laura Ann Kesling


The article Laura Ann Kesling has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability not asserted. No major roles in multiple films, etc. No major awards."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of Magik (Illyana and Storm Limited Series) 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of Magik (Illyana and Storm Limited Series) 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Panama by Van Halen.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Panama by Van Halen.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Take Me Home, Country Roads by John Denver.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Take Me Home, Country Roads by John Denver.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Afternoon Delight by The Starland Vocal Band.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Afternoon Delight by The Starland Vocal Band.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marrakesh Express by Crosby, Stills &#38; Nash.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Marrakesh Express by Crosby, Stills &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Your Time Is Gonna Come by Led Zeppelin.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Your Time Is Gonna Come by Led Zeppelin.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Scrapped Princess s01e08.png
Thank you for uploading File:Scrapped Princess s01e08.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)