User talk:Perfectinblue

Commercial use of Image:Efron zac 01sci.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Efron zac 01sci.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Efron zac 01sci.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Efron zac 01sci.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Baby mack g
The article Baby mack g has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 03:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Baby mack g tagged for speedy deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, Baby mack g, has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  04:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:052.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:052.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus
Hello, and thank you for your contributions, including those to Miley Cyrus. The integration of controversies into the main body was done by editors in hope of making the biography more neutral. If you have an opinion about it, please bring it up on the talk page of the article: Talk:Miley Cyrus. Thanks, liquidluck ✽ talk  02:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Moving the controversies out of the article body is a significant change, and it would be helpful if you would discuss the change on the talk page before doing so. One of few real rules we have at Wikipedia is that content must maintain a neutral point of view, and creating a single block of negative information does not appear to uphold this rule. Please share your thoughts on the talk page (Talk:Miley Cyrus---just edit it like you would any other page). Thanks, liquidluck ✽ talk  18:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Victoria Beckham, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rodhull andemu  20:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Gossip
There's no need to introduce gossip, like this, into Wikipedia articles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)