User talk:Peridon/Archives/2009/December

Chatsworth Products, Inc. marked as spam
You marked my article as possible spam. Could you provide some assistance on what I can do to make the content more worthy for Wikipedia. This article was not created to promote or advertise Chatsworth Products, Inc. (CPI), but to provide Wikipedia users with solid facts about the company’s origination as an Employee Ownership Association (ESOP), the types of data center products and energy efficient solutions designed for technology equipment and involvement in overall industry development. To maintain the position of the Chatsworth Products, Inc. on Wikipedia.com, this article is currently undergoing revisions to present consistently neutral and strictly non-promotional content. This is my first article, so any suggestions you can provide would be greatly appreciated. In addition, would it be possible to remove the notice of the article marked as possible spam since updates are taking place. Thanks, take care. --Mclawpr (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)User talk:Mclawpr

ANI posted regarding AfD discussion
Hello, Peridon. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is concerning an ongoing and very controversial AfD discussion taking place.

Since you were polite enough to write out the extreme conflict of interest worries, the discussion will likely be of relevance and interest to you. Feel free to head over this way. Cheers~ ♪ daTheisen(talk) 05:57, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Relisting notice
Per Spartaz's request, I am notifying you that this discussion that you participated in has been relisted at Articles for deletion/Una Healy (2nd nomination) in the hopes to gain a more fair consensus due to the participation of three sock puppet accounts in the earlier discussion. The three sock accounts that checkuser confirmed are the same person voted to delete or redirect and made multiple edits to the discussion which closed as "redirect" and therefore may have created a false impression of consensus by vote-stacking. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 20:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Binfer
I declined your G11 speedy as the article was reasonably factual and not too spammy, but it certainly does not seem notable; I was on my way to see whether you wanted to AfD it, as it had already been de-PRODded, but someone else has already done that. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

hallo from Uwe Kils
can you please vote again on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_(3rd_nomination). Best wishes Uwe Kils 15:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Record for deletion discussions
Three nominations is nothing. See Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (9th nomination), Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (14th nomination), Articles for deletion/List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck" (9th nomination), Articles for deletion/Gay Nigger Association of America (18th nomination), Articles for deletion/Uncyclopedia (ninth Nomination), Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica (7 AfDs, 16 DRVs), Talk:The_Game_(mind_game) (6 AfDs, 3 DRVs). Fences &amp;  Windows  18:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Chalie Boy
Yep, the major label and the charted song did the trick. He easily passes notability now. Thanks. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: IACVA
Hello Peridon, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of IACVA - a page you tagged - because: Largest in world is usually consudered an assertion of importance. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 13:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * PS You don't seem to be informing the authors of the articles that you tag for speedy deletion, there is a template generated by most of the speedy tags so you only have to copy and paste it to the article's author.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 14:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC)