User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/February

Speedy delete
Whether or not if you add an extra db tag to the article, the article has already been nominated for a speedy deletion. The administrator will react accordingly to the content of the article. If you know what section is the spam you can improve the article by removing it or adjusting it so it isn't advertising.

"Anyone can request speedy deletion by adding one of the speedy deletion templates. Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved..." - WP:SPEEDY --Rent A Troop (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

James Long (Businessman & Socialite)
I started to AfD this, because I thought enough importance was asserted to pass A7; but on closer examination it's pretty thin, mostly about his ancestors, and your A7 was maybe right. Something is wrong with the AfD log so that I can't complete the nomination tonight, but I'll do it tomorrow. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Stop press - nomination completed here. JohnCD (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Reverting Seiwert-fleige
Why do you continue to delete all the hard work that we are doing on this article? These are not problematic edits.. these are facts with reliable sources and are backed up and can be found upon research. why are you discriminating against any new edits on this page? everytime we try to fix it and correct the wrong information which condradicts with the other wikipedia articles that are connected to this page you delete it. look at the other wikipedia articles which discuss Seiwert-fliege and you will see that our edits are relevant to those other articles. do you really think it is proper to have one article speak the truth about someone and a sub article show a confusing opposite explanation of the truth? please stop reverting the article and let people modify and edit it with the facts, resources , links and photos that obivoulsy show the facts and not mis-information which is obviously up there now with your reverted version.--Michelle cannon (talk) 12:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

3RR warning
You're coming close to violating the three-revert rule on Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige. Edit warring can result in blocking. If you believe that an information in the article is wrong then use the discussion on talk page ! --Templeknight (talk) 13:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC) (moved to correct place by Peridon (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

CSD tagging
Hi Peridon, when you tag pages for speedy deletion would you mind informing the authors please - I've just informed for you. Thanks  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  15:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

"Bishop" Seiwert-Fleige
Stop spreading the nonsense that he is a bishop ! He is a costume dresser !

Look at the article Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige.

I am a big fan since what he did was almost impossible. He is the greatest costume dresser ever and for this he deserves his article in wikipedia ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ban Yoo (talk • contribs) 12:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. --Ban Yoo (talk) 13:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

New Changes to the article "Bishop" Seiwert-Fleige
I am getting a headache with all this reverting and accusations. I changed the article and I hope that now it is to your liking. Please look at it and if you still do not like what I include then please tell me specifically what you would like that i include or not include. But all these accusations and harrassment against me has to stop. Thankyou --Michelle cannon (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Notification
Thanks for notifying. I warned the user first using Huggle but when I tried to revert it it lagged. Thanks for that, keep up the good work. Mohamed Magdy, Thank You! (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Hangon
Why the flag? I changed the content and removed all verbaige that could be considered self promoting. Please do not remove. Thanks! User talk:Barkenstein —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barkenstein (talk • contribs) 22:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

next attack on Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige
hello peridon It looks like maybe the next sockpuppet or hater apeared on the Seiwert-Fleige article: by the name of paphase

He called Seiwert Fleige a "schismatic rogue" of a "fringe church" and claims that the german goverment is not working correct.

He's fighting his own personal fanatic religious war in Wikipedia. I dont see any editing contributions from him for this article... only attacks.

please have a look at the talk page of seiwert fleige and inform an admin. --Michelle cannon (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Unsigned or undated stuff
Peridon, can you please tell me how to delete my page (Sherpa LLC)? I don't want to just delete the contents and leave the page blank. Please provide any help you can. Thank you for your time and help in this matter.--CShortt09 (talk) 15:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)