User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/July

Hot Topics in... page
Hi! thank you for helping out, but I have noticed that other journals such as The Lancet and the Journal of Hypertension have even less reliable or independent sources and do not have any refimprove tag on. However, our series are mentioned in the lower part of the Ebsco page, and being indexed in Embase and certified by HONcode is not a simple procedure but is consequent to a long review process which confirms the scientific validity of the journal. I might add the it has been included in 2009's edition of Periodicals for Health Science, and ref to some scientific papers that cite those articles, but I am not sure if this or other similar refs might satisfy your requirement. Please advise. Thanks again --Amerloni (talk) 10:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amerloni (talk • contribs)

Spam blocks
Just in case you're not watching my talk page, thanks for the note about no signature in Spam blocks. I was forgetting to "subst" the templates: I know full well what to do if I think of it. And catering quantities... yes, there should be a joke there somewhere. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Greetings
Greetings Peridon - thanks for that. Hope you managed to deal with the earwig spider. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 05:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

userpages
If you're checking userpages (as you seem to be doing), might I ask that you avail yourself of the patrolled pages feature? It'd make things easier for me if the good pages are marked "patrolled", and are out of my way and I don't have to sort through them to get to the bad pages. Thanks. DS (talk) 14:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Page for deletion
You have marked the FREEDOM4 WiFi page for deletion - can you please provide feedback to why you have done this on the Freedom4 discussion page? --Rbcunliffe (talk)19:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I based 100% of the article of the O2 and Vodafone page, simply chaning the names of products and awards, so not sure how the same content is ok for O2 and Vodafone and not for FREEDOM4 WiFi? What should i do now? --Rbcunliffe (talk)20:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in here, but if the admins have agreed to the speedy deletion, then there is nothing really you can do other than possible challenging the delete (I would only do that if you are absolutely 100% sure that you thought the deletion was unnecessary). --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I am challenging the deletion! --Rbcunliffe (talk)20:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Butting in
Thankyou :) --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you mean. I have no idea whats going on there. As far as I can tell, my time is correct as well... It couldn't be because we are in two different time zones? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any idea how I can sort this out? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan :D. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

re: Vendors
Hi. Yeah I saw we were kinda working on the same thing there & I didn't hesitate when I saw it was just external links in the list. Always got my eyes open for those kind of lists. Thanks for stopping by! Dawnseeker2000  22:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Yes, it does sound quite funny, but I prefer to write things in a kind of philosophic way, makes it sound like were battling evil.--AlastorMoody (talk) 01:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm trying to write and article that will be within Wikipedia's guidelines. Is there an area where I can put a draft that can't be publicly seen? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthexton (talk • contribs) 23:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

re: Grimmia
Thanks Peridon! I hope the information will be helpful to you, as well as to others :-) Joseph khoeblal (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hubbards Foods
Hello Peridon, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hubbards Foods, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 19:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * A7 is not about notability. That is a common mistake. A simple assertion of importance, such as being founded by a notable person, is enough to meet the criterion. Theleftorium (talk) 21:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I do appreciate your work, and I hope you continue. However, please use AfD instead of speedy in the future when the subject of the article might be notable (a Google News search is a good way to determine this). That way there is a better chance that the article will be improved instead of deleted. :) Theleftorium (talk) 21:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)