User talk:Peridon/Archives/2011/January

Speedy deletion declined: Josua Cruz
Hello Peridon. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Josua Cruz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Inducted into a hall of fame is an assertion of importance. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 11:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Up for Deletion declined: The Fronts of War
Hello Peridon. I am just letting you know that i declined the deletion of The Fronts of War, a page that you tagged up for deletion, because of the following concern: Not yet made (or made) film by un-notable person. Thank You Greggy 2746 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greggy2746 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

--Deletion of external link of supply chain operation reference model-- Hi Peridon... I'm not sure if you read and understand the content of external link. Outside wikipedia, there are tons of articles under this topic just copy and paste job from supply chain council website. This external link is unique and useful content because it's part of research done in non-english speaking country. It deserves a place in wiki for the interest of general public. Do you really have knowledge in this subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boonanan (talk • contribs) 15:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Perido, I will insert new link (there was a problem with previous link). Please check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boonanan (talk • contribs) 14:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Dreams and Shadows
Good points made at the AFD. So I gave the Dreams and Shadows article itself another go-through. Sure wish the SPAs would quit mucking with it, as puppets are my suspician, and that sort of stuff needlessly taints AFD discussion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

inre this diff
I realized what he was tying to do and was able to correct the problem.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank for your comment
Could you take another look at Grenville Anderson? It has some references now, with more to come. Cullen328 (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Organic Lawn Management (band)
My thanks for your highly accurate comments at Articles for deletion/The Organic Lawn Management (band), particularly the element "As to the !vote situation - the notice means "it's not a head count, so don't bother creating accounts just to say 'Keep' with no sound reason given". This is a discussion, and I and many others who are regulars at Articles for Deletion want to get to the bottom of things. We are mostly prepared to change our minds, given evidence. The closing admin will usually ignore posts that don't contribute anything more than 'I like it' (or 'I don't like it', even...). " - keep up the good work. Ironholds (talk) 05:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd prefer a scotch, but I won't say no to alcohol ;p. Yeah, I will have been here for five years in March. I can feel my bones creaking - we provide a pension, right? Ironholds (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Touche :P. I did actually have a user once ask me, in utter seriousness, "so, I've been editing for about a month now. How do I get paid? Do I like, send you my bank details?" Ironholds (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pitmans
Hello Peridon. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pitmans, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Ged UK  13:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Red rose64 (talk) 13:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

==Page I added==

Thanks for saying it needs more refrences. I was just looking at Oscar winners that don't have pages, and I noticed she didn't win she won alot so I figured I put up a page, but yeah I do need some refrences Kamkek (talk) 19:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay well I'm getting some now that I'm looking up, found some awards that the person won on the IMDB so that can be a link
Kamkek (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Exclusive
I would hope it excludes rain and wind... Peridon (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Try the Ariel Atom. It has a special rain and wind deflector, which protects from rain and wind the same way my Speedos protect me from an Arctic ice storm. Silvicult 401 (talk) 23:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Dreamworld
By the grace of AlMighty Allah, this is an extremely important page for Pakistan as well as Pakistanis. The wrong media perception of the country (which has population of more than 200 million people Alhamdulillah) is strongly countered by Amusing places like Dreamworld. People of Pakistan are passionate, fun loving, family oriented people who live a very normal and usual life like most of the other 5.80 billion people of the world. Dreamworld is one such place through which Allah provides such life style to Pakistanis. The Australian Dreamworld page on wikipedia have much more info than this page which is infact giving a "promotional" impact of that Amusement Park. But more importantly it does not have its national identity associated with it as loudly as this page, as you may notice the title of this page: "Dreamworld PAKISTAN". Thus, this page is not only fit on wikipedia criteria but its subject is also very important and significant as it adds another value into Pakistan's true National image.

It is strongly recommended to not only restrict deletion of this page but also help in deigning it better. You may visit the official website of Dreamworld PAKISTAN and see for yourself that by the grace of AlMighty Allah how big the Resort is. How many Resorts in the world do you think have following so many attractions in one place: Water Park, Amusement park, Golf course, Hotel, Spa, numerous Restaurants, etc? Tariq hilal (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Tariq Hilal

Thank you
Well, your swift response and some what supporting one is very much appreciated. However, though you might not be deleting it however you did propose it. For sure Admins will have greater confidince in senior wikipedian like yourself than any one else which than increases the chances of DELEION of a genuine encyclopedic effort. Thank you for your suggestion and guidance but the doubts have already been created whcih can be removed by you by removing the deletion comments.

In further support of the current stand following text of "WikiProject Amusement Parks" is pasted here for your quick referrencce which gives another reason that why it is extremely important for Dreamworld Pakistan to have its own individual identification on Wikipedia:

''Project scope The ultimate goal of this WikiProject is to improve the quality of articles relating to amusement and theme parks. In order to accomplish this goal, Wikipedia will need an article on every amusement park in the world (as well as parks that are no longer operating) as well as articles on everything related to amusement parks. This includes, types of rides (ie. log flumes, roller coasters, carousels, etc.), people involved in developing rides and amusement parks and actual ride installations.''

Now, if Dreamworld Pakistan will not have the page here than how will it participate in the above existing project of Wikipedia.

Another reason: Following text is pasted from Dreamworld Australia page which is very promotional than Dreamworld Pakistan: Dreamworld is a large theme park situated on the Gold Coast in Queensland. It is currently Australia's largest theme park with over 27 rides including 4 roller coasters. The park is made up of several themed lands: Ocean Parade, Nick Central, Wiggles World, Gold Rush Country, Rocky Hollow, Tiger Island and the Australian Wildlife Experience. These lands feature a collection of rides, animal exhibits, shows, food outlets and merchandise shops.[1] Dreamworld is well known for being the location of the Australian Big Brother House for 8 years. In December 2006, Dreamworld expanded its offerings by opening WhiteWater World next door.[2] Numerous times throughout the year, Dreamworld remains open after dark. This event, known as Screamworld, features all thrill rides and a selection of children's rides.[3]

Finally a Request: Please look at the merits above and Delete your speedy deletion comment. Thank you for your guidance and support. Tariq hilal (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Tariq Hilal

No problem and thank you any ways
No problem and thank you any ways. Best regards. Tariq — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tariq hilal (talk • contribs) 20:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

FYI
FYI regretfully your comment finally resulted in deletion of the page. --Tariq hilal (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Tariq Hilal

Genetic Genealogy
Hello, The answer is yes, and no. Right now, I would go with no. For example, William the Conqueror had issue: If someone says that they have 8 men who are all positive that they are the direct male descendants of William the Conqueror, they test those men with a significant number of Y-chromosome str markers, and they closely match each other then I am willing to believe that they come from the Normandy line. You are going to have a hard time convincing me that some of them do not come from Robert the Magnificent's other offspring or even one of his great grandfather's offspring. Even more, you are going to have a hard time convincing me that you can tell to which of William's sons each man traces. Two men could be exact matches with 67 STR markers with over 10 generations between them.
 * Robert Curthose
 * Richard, Duke of Bernay
 * William II of England
 * Henry I of England

This exact subject and Rollo is actually pretty popular Explico Fund Rollo the Viking's DNA. Soon, every man in Europe can see if he is descended from Rollo or one of his cousins.

Note that Rollo has known descendants to exhume and test. The house of Ashina does not. The soil in that part of the world is not conductive to DNA preservation. Thus, even if a Khazar city and grave sites were found, the DNA is likely long gone.

On the other hand, I expect that in the next 18 months to 3 years it will be possible to sequence most of the Y-chromosome for a reasonable cost. When that happens, it will be possible to ID the connection between two or more men within a shorter number of family branches. There are still the catches though. First, the Y-chromosome will always need to be the direct male line. Second, the clear Y-chromosome SNPs are always going to be randomly 1 to 5 generations apart. --RebekahThorn (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Great commission church speedied
I didn't create the article. I stumbled on it on new page patrol, and decided it would be a challenge to try an "save". I knew odds were against it, but it's always fun to try. Anyway, I informed User:James.oesch (apparently the creator) of the deletion tag and pasted a version of the text into his user space in case he wants to work on it some more. Thanks! DAVIDABLE 19:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll leave a message with the original creator of the page to see if he has any insights on additional sources that I have not been able to find.  If not, I'll remove the  tag this time tomorrow, and let the deletion process take its course.  Thanks,  DAVIDABLE  20:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello and Thank You
Thank you for your feed back on article i have written the reply there.

--Ranatalwar (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)