User talk:Peridon/Archives/2012/April

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Peridon


A tag has been placed on User:Peridon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Yash t  101  :)  10:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

User:Intoronto1125
As I see you have also been active in warning thised. about his absurd speedy deletions, I think i should mention to you that I have banned him for 7 days from placing speedys except for copyvio and vandalism, and have warned him he will be blocked if he continues. I mention it because he has been removing the notices about his improper deletions--as well as my warning-- from his user talk page. I'd appreciate if you could keep an eye on it also.  DGG ( talk ) 21:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Classical Anatolia
Thanks for comments. Next time I will be proactive in anticipating some patroller tagging me with a Speedy every time I start a page! --Michael Goodyear (talk) 21:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Repeating Yesterday
Thanks for removing Repeating Yesterday. Is it possible to protect this against recreation? The author himself (possibly a sockpuppet) stated that he had recreated it after seeing it removed before. I can't find the evidence for that, but I have been involved in earlier versions of this article. I am not sure, but I think this is the third version. They all had the same issues: excessive dab-linking (the reason why I got involved) and cover art without proper licence/copyvio. Night of the Big Wind talk  13:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked the author per WP:DUCK and added to Sockpuppet investigations/ZappRoger501, requesting CU for sleepers. I've put both titles on my watchlist - if it comes up again, I'll protect it. Thanks. Peridon (talk) 14:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Happy Easter!
Happy Easter! Hope your day is great!  Yash  t  101   11:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's damp and cold and I should be up a ladder woodstaining window frames... Thanks for both the bunny and the barnstar (and comments...). No, I don't speak all those languages, but I can speak passable French (and read it well) and I read some of the others. Some, like Marathi, I only add wiki-links to. I can find my way around enough to do that. I have managed to get an article deleted speedily on fr-wiki, and discuss sockpuppets and possible frauds on de-wiki. All good fun. I enjoy languages, and sometimes wonder if the purpose of the human race is really to be lab rats for testing language variants - grammar rules are so unlikely in a lot of cases, it's almost as if a class of students had been given their own group to set up rules for. A bit like Sims on a rather large scale. There's a basis for a story there... (I used to get into trouble in French, German and Latin lessons because I translated straight into fluent English, not going word by word as the teachers wanted. I just couldn't see the point.) Peridon (talk) 12:16, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for your support at my RfA - and for your congratulations/commiserations. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Essel World
Hi there,

You deleted the article Essel World for Blatant Advertising. Essel World is an amusement park in Mumbai. There are a few independant sources which I had added but it was removed. I created the article long time ago but others users would come along and add information which made it look like advertising. I would like the article moved to my user space. Please help me to do this. You can google for Essel World. The article needed work and definitely can be salvaged. --Belasd (talk) 18:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Done - it's at User:Belasd/Essel World. Peridon (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much!! --Belasd (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Schicagos
Just to let you know you're being quoted on his blog. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Farooque kalhoro
Just wanted to tell that this user has been creating the articleNasrullah Kalhoro Dadu for more than 13 times as every time, it got A7ed. Please take some steps if necessary. Thank you and happy editing!  Yash  t  101   17:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Resubmitting an Article
Hi Peridon, I'm trying to resubmit an article titled as CustomerXPs, which was deleted earlier for using advertising language. Now the article is re-written completely referring to wiki's content policies and neutral point of view. Each point is cited and referred to relevant and reliable media sources. Here is the link to view the article on my sandbox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jitheshcxps/sandbox. I have removed the article from the main space and kept it on my sandbox for your perusal. Kindly review this and give your feedback. Thanks, Jitheshcxps (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * In-fact i couldn't remove the article from main space. Please help me in moving this to my sandbox.

Jitheshcxps (talk) 20:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I had a huggle-fail and reverted Jitheshcxps's attempt to blank his mainspace version. I've fixed it now - mainspace version is gone, he can continue to work on the sandbox version. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Peridon, It would be of great help if you can review the article and give me feedback. Thanks,Jitheshcxps (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I see nothing that even hints at notability, especially as per WP:CORP. It looks simply like a business directory listing, which we're not. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 15:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

CopyRight
I've removed some definite copyvio and moved it to User:Arwel ap Dewi ap Siôn/Shaping the Future Project. You can't use any text direct from an outside site unless it is licensed under Creative Commons or is in the public domain. This was from a page that said c 2012 at the bottom. No way, José; sorry, no way, Arwel son of David son of John. I've removed the bits I saw were copy and paste, and am leaving it to you to remove any others. I don't advise getting the original licensed as it fails WP:NPOV - 'unique' is a killer, for example, unless you are taking about something like the Tuatara. The reference you gave doesn't seem to mention this project on the page you link - you have to be precise; please see WP:RS for what is and isn't a reliable independent source and there must be at least something more than a mention in any ref. I would advise making similar changes at cy:Prosiect Llunio'r Dyfodol, although the rules may be different there regarding NPOV. The rules regarding copyvio (WP:COPYVIO) won't be. Copyright is copyright (except perhaps in North Korea...). When you've got the article into shape, ask for an opinion. I'm always willing (time permitting) to give an opinion (not always reliable - get another too...), or put and an appeal on your talk page with a link to the article (or put it on the talk page of the draft and remember to keep an eye on it). BTW The camel case title here is a reference to your copy-wright, which if it existed (and it ought to...) would be an employee for the purpose of hand copying (or nowadays typing out) someone else's work. (I'm going to work that one into a somewhat medieval-ish project I've got in hand...) PS Don't be afraid to ask me questions I can't answer. I know people who will be able to... Peridon (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * In case you haven't guessed, it is who has copied all this back here. He wrote a reply to you on his talk page saying "All this information is in the public domain", by which I guess he means publicly visible; I wrote a further explanation of PD and copyright for him, and some more advice, but while I was doing that he copied your message back here and blanked it and his reply from his talk page. I added my advice there, for what it's worth. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Peridon (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I see he has already submitted his draft to AfC. It uses the word "unique" three times in seven lines, and I suspect he has put the copyvio back in, but I can't spare any more time for him just now. JohnCD (talk) 19:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, some help on NPP please
Just started to take a look in at new pages patrolling, saw that you just zapped a page I went to visit out of curiosity, created by the user about the user, I have two questions: one, what is going on here? Porky's Five and Ten, something's fishy as there is a maintenance tag from 2010 but hte article was just created, but I can't seem to find any deletion of the same article beforehand two, how does one indicate that a page has been patrolled? I'm new to all this so seeing as you're on patrol, I thought I'd ask.  Captain Screebo Parley! 20:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Nicely spotted. It looks like a re-creation (complete with dated tag!) of a previously deleted article, or a copy and paste of something currently existing. Got it - Little Beau Porky is the base on which the Five and Ten article has been built. Looks like it is a genuine film (at a very quick glance). I'm off to bed, so I'd suggest checking that out, and changing the date in the tag (which came with the base used). How'd I do it? Took an interesting sentence and Googled it in quotes with 'Wikipedia' outside the quotes - it came up with the first version in the history. It's a good way of checking suspect articles too - people often copy an article about a footballer, say, and change the name (presumably to their own, a close friend, or a kid for their birthday). Doing that counts as hoax, so tag it as such and leave a note on the talk page to say why. Porky here is just someone doing what I often advise amateur producers of newsletters and club/group magazines to do - use a ready-formatted previous issue as a base to save time. As to indicating something has been patrolled, I haven't a clue. Never done it. I've often found that things someone has already looked at may still be up the creek on closer inspection. For an example, if I marked an article about a footballer as patrolled, that wouldn't be worth tuppence (if I even knew how...). Keep up the good work, and don't be afraid to drop by for more tips that aren't in the book of rules (or at least, I haven't found them there...). ;-) Peridon (talk) 20:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't say, but if it IS a real film, it's OK. Add some sort of ref and change to refimprove as a tag. If it ain't, hoax it. Peridon (talk) 20:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your nous, I updated the tag, and for info, you have to go to the article directly from NPP and there is a little link to click "mark this page as patrolled", if you edit or anything, it disappears, well, worked that one out, thanks for your help.  Captain Screebo Parley! 21:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

mr.tinoforever
I was confused with this article. This states that he has released few songs and EP (by not mentioning the record lable) and he is a famous youtube person. Not much importance can be gained from google about him so is the article eligible for A7 or AfD? Regards.  Yash  t  101   12:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The article was about him and the recordings were an attempt show notablity. A7 was fine - RHaworth obviously agreed (twice today) and Mike Rosoft deleted it yesterday too.. I'd have used db-band, but person works as well. The recordings were all digital download - not a great thing for significance, just as going to Lulu doesn't do much for a book's significance. There are few really famous YouTube people outside their own imaginations. Just found it under another name. Deleted it without tagging, which is something we rarely do. Left him a note seeing as I'M not banned from his talk page yet... (You are.) Peridon (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I am now. 8.-( Peridon (talk) 13:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I see you've made a new friend. All the deleted material has been posted up on the user page as a wiki-article so I added a tag, there is also an attempt at a petition to save the above article or get it re-instated, but the user has now been blocked for a week (I guess for the page blanking here and so on). What do you make of all this, is it okay to keep an article that's been deleted on your user page totally formatted like in article space? Shouldn't it be on a draft page? And if it was deleted for non-notability? I'm checking some of the other stuff xe's created/added too, I think there's some borderline stuff. Cheers!  Captain Screebo  Parley! 16:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not stuff I deleted. The author is currently on a week's block (by RHaworth) for personal attacks. The whole lot could probably do to be looked at - I haven't got round to it yet. Draft articles really should be on subpages, but userpage is often used, and RH moved some of it there from the talk page. Stuff that's been deleted isn't always removable from userspace (except copyvio, spam and attack, of course). Non-notable stuff is quite often userfied (a strange wikiword) for improvement. This appears to be about himself. I'm not too worried about it, and I think your tag will do for now. He could make a good editor if he can be directed onto somewhat more notable subjects than those I've seen so far. Those might be all he's interested in, however. We'll see. He mightn't even come back. Peridon (talk) 16:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh I know that you didn't do the speedys, you just got yourself onto some sort of hitlist (and not of the pop charts variety). Okay for the tag for now but I'm sure this is an Arnie-type user, we shall see.  Captain Screebo Parley! 16:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

copyvio issue
Your edit summary states: Not copyvio - source is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA. However, the NC is a problem. See FAQ/Copyright and note it is in the list of licenses not compatible.

However, I think the article has been sufficiently rewritten, and in particular, the copied material is now used as a quote, with a reference, and is sufficiently short, I don't view this as a copyvio. It may well have other issues, but I'll leave those to others.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  11:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that - missed the NC... Peridon (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Unblock Account
I would like to formally apologize that our original draft was deemed inappropriate and request that our account be unblocked. Since our “speedy deletion”, we have revised our initial article draft, keeping a neutral and objective stance, and removing any content that could be construed as marketing. If unblocked, we intend to follow standard guidelines and make useful contributions to the network and its readers. As you know, the industry has numerous pages to inform users about all of our competitors and therefore we should be allowed to have an entry to provide factual information about our firm and the areas in which we work.

With regards to our user name, we would like to use “ScottMadden, Inc.”, not User:ScottMadden/sandbox. We will follow standard protocol for updating this name.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. I look forward to speaking with you shortly.

70.46.255.210 (talk) 18:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)maryhall@scottmadden.com
 * Sorry, it's the ScottMadden bit that's the problem, namewise. That must not be in the name - see WP:USERNAME. As to competitors, the existence of any article does not entitle anything else to have an article WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. This isn't a directory, it's an encyclopaedia. On somewhere like AboutUs, you might be able to claim that because BloggsCo had a profile, you should - but you wouldn't need to as they are open for anyone. Here, we have a nasty habit of insisting on notability - please see WP:CORP for corporate notability and WP:RS for the reliable independent sources need to prove it. Your competitors might have notability shown - they might have escaped notice like that sandbox did. If they don't, please feel free to tag them (but be sure of the policies first...). As to the references you put in that sandbox draft, articles BY the company don't count for notability. It's articles ABOUT the company by someone outside we want. Not things containing stuff like "'Blah di blah di rhubarb,' says Fred Bloggs, the CEO of BloggsCo, our company of the hour." Press releases are out, as are blogs, forums, PRWire, wikis, AboutUs, LinkedIn and the usual suspects like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Finally, you are really supposed to post unblock requests on your talkpage, unless that's been revoked - no, just looked and you can edit your talkpage (sometimes people get to be a total nuisance and have to be stopped). Admins don't unblock from requests on their talkpages (not commonly, anyway, unless there's been a real mistake made). You will need to use the spamun template and avoid both Scott and Madden in the new name. Be prepared for some conditions - editing about your own company is not really advised and do realise that the article may be edited by anyone. I say this remembering a chap who had a vanity article posted. We were discussing deleting it (and he was fighting tooth and nail), when all of a sudden, someone posted some very interesting stuff - and referenced it very well. We all decided to keep it then, but the subject started fighting tooth and nail to get it deleted... He failed. Even though you write an article, you don't own it (see WP:OWN), and you cannot control other editors - so long as they are giving proper referencing. This doesn't need saying most of the time, but I prefer to get it in early. Just in case... Peridon (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Salting Remember Our Story Eternally worthwhile?
Hey, Peridon, I saw that you deleted this article. It's been created by the same user three times now, and each time it reads exactly the same (IIRC). Is it time to salt the page? Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 20:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've messaged the author - perhaps an explanation will keep it away. I usually allow four goes before salting, but it's an option sooner. See how this goes - I feel he's genuine and in need of guidance more than salt. Peridon (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, thanks. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 20:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Numismatic history of the United States
Hi, I'm alive and kicking! Doing a paper on paper money, and found this horror of an article, written just a few months ago by a purported sockpuppet of a banned user. Eek! I'm being rude. It may not be a horror, but it's not good. Wanna take a look? It's right up your alley. I was going to nominate it for deletion, but don't really know how to or have the time. Off and running..... and very best wishes! Yopienso (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Seen you around here and there, so I wasn't worrying... Numismatics up my street? I've sold a heck of a lot more stamps than coins... I've just, through this, discovered what I consider a beautiful American coin, the Sacagawea dollar (most are cluttered or banal or difficult to my mind - I don't like the reverse of our current UK coins either, and the letter I sent to the Mint was not really repeatable here). I agree with the admin that blocked the author - this seems to me to pass WP:DUCK. (Or do I mean fail? Whatever, I hear something quacking.) They don't seem to have appealed, which confirms my suspicions. Compared with Coins of the United States dollar, this article is untidy, but contains info not there. If you like, I'll put it at AfD and hope for someone to volunteer to merge or rewrite. Not really what AfD is for, but I've not come up yet with an idea for doing what I often want - pressuring volunteers to improve things. Using AfD is possibly cruelty to the anti-deletionists. but it works... I'd think that separating paper and coin would be a good idea. Let me know what you think. PS - How do you all manage over there with all that sort of grey-green paper money? Ours is colour and size coded (although our £20s look as if the colour has run in the wash... Peridon (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You're a dear old bear. You are right, the Sacagawea dollar is beautiful. It's considered a flop, though--nobody used it. We aren't used to dollar coins; guess we're stuck on a wrinkled green George W.! Or maybe we're used to silver-colored coins. Or maybe we're still racist and chauvinist?? The Eisenhower dollar was well received, I believe, but didn't circulate much; it was/is hoarded. I've never been given either in change. (But I nearly always pay with plastic!) A number of years ago our notes from $5 and up started turning pastel to thwart counterfeiters. (Do they really counterfeit 5s and 10s?? Or do some engravers just need a job?) They looked funny, but I'm getting used to them. OK, that proves it--I have folding dollars, but not clinking ones. Also, I worked a cash register for several summers and never got metal dollars. Ergo, the coins just don't circulate. Cheers! Juana la Iguana. Yopienso (talk) 22:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

User:IPL1 and User:IPL3
While moving a template, this was created by me. I m sorry. Please fix it. Thanks  Yash  t  101   05:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the two non-existent users, and corrected IPL1... Hope that's what you wanted, anyway. Peridon (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 *  Yash  t  101   04:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Peridon, thank you for your concise and focused editorial control of this great knowledge base. I commend you. - regarding your recent deletion of, pinkhearmovement. This is a brand new charity, launched this week, it is growing rapidly and focused on a simple goal = provide the world a charity focused social network to connect charities and donors. “Just consider the possibilities if we could help all charities be even 10% more efficient in contributing to their cause…”

We really welcome all the support possible, to see this be the best it can be, we have software teams working on programming, launch focused 1st May, and would greatly value your contribution to replace and improve the article. please get in contact with us at admin@pinkheartmovement.org

Most importantly - thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.142.253.6 (talk) 03:00, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 19:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I screwed a lot, didn't I?
 Yash  t  101   21:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

MSU Research Questions
Hello, I am involved with a research project for Michigan State University and am wondering if you would be able to answer a few questions regarding tool sets on Wikipedia. What were the tools you mainly used prior to becoming an admin, and after becoming an admin? Here is a link to the project if you are interested United States Education Program/Courses/Wiki-Project Management (Jonathan Obar), and if you have any questions please let me know. Thanks! Ltezl (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Very easy answer to that one - before becoming an admin, I used no tools. None. Some RfAs have comments about excess of automated editing - mine had a comment about zero use of tools. Since becoming an admin, I've used Twinkle as it saves time, but still do quite a lot manually, including personally oriented messages on userpages instead of bland templates all the time. Twinkle is useful to me for routine stuff that is otherwise time-consuming, like starting an AfD. It's a tool that doesn't have a built-in judgement factor of its own. I distrust machine judgements unless there is an easy override. (And I detest those phone call sorters that never have an option for the problem I an ringing about.) OK. Next question? Peridon (talk) 08:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That is basically it, keep it short and sweet. I appreciate your help! Ltezl (talk) 14:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

deleted page TRIAD-CHESS
on 24:45, 15 April 2012 you delete my article presenting the TRIAD-CHESS. My desire is simply to do an article showing the game and nothing else. Could you tell me what I should delete to be accepted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GiViT 13 (talk • contribs)
 * OK. I've moved it from that talkpage to User:GiViT 13/DRAFT to avoid it being deleted again - talkpages without a parent article get deleted. Why was it deleted? Not because of the rather non-English English - I could sort that out, especially if given a copy of the original French. One trouble is that it reads like an advertisement. Words like 'amazing' and 'optimised' are regarded as being promotional, and that's just two examples. You should read WP:NPOV - our policy on how to write properly for an encyclopaedia (neutral point of view). Another problem is that you do not give any references to shoe notability. You should read WP:RS about reliable independent sources. Places that are connected to the game in any way or which are selling it, or are blogs, forums, wikis, or various other things considered unreliable, are no use for showing notability. I find that the English language Wikipedia is stricter on references than are some of the other languages. I've been to several, looking for references for something, and not found any references for the subject I was looking up. I would advise reading WP:SPAM - our policy on advertising and promotion - even if you were not intending to advertise this game. The game actually looks interesting - I once thought of building a four way set. but as I'm not a very good chess player and don't know anyone near me who plays anyway, I didn't. Peridon (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Apparently there are two copies of it now, User:GiViT 13/DRAFT and User:GiViT 13/Draft. Derp. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the one with DRAFT in it. No need for both. I've put the DRAFT heading in. I'm not very happy about the edit summary for the creation of that page - "New sujet on the world of chess : New game / Information : This texte and pictures are my creation, please no delect my page of presentation TRIAD-CHESS game. Thank you very much". This suggests to me that there is an intent to promote the game, and if it is new, there's possibly not much coverage yet. We'll see. Peridon (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for all that information. I understand ... despite this, it has removed my logo (reason: image protected) is true, but it's mine and I'm all right on this logo.


 * It also removed the little line mentioning my game parmie all three versions of chess players. Why? I do not know ... perhaps taken for the promotion, but then there was only asking me to withdraw from the market so I can mention it on the wiki.


 * The page I'm talking about is:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-player_chess


 * which was :


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three-player_chess&oldid=487663872

(talk) 10:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-boxy things
Hello there, I see that the world Ballet Competition page was deleted. Could I please have access to it and edit it to make sure that it meets guidelines? There are other numerous other competitions listed and it is shame that one of the most prestigious ones out there is not. Please let me know if it is accessible and where I can edit the content, then resubmit it for approval.

Thanks in advanced.

Florin --- unsigned comment added by 184.88.70.234 (talk) 23:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

The article was deleted as it was a copy violation of this website. The article was also deleted as unambiguous advertising. If you wish to start the article again, please see Your first article and What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister  talk  07:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll just add to that, to say that the link to Our Mission doesn't seem to be working. Even though the text seems to have gone form the source site, it WAS there, and so is still copyright, and while text from outside Wikipedia can be licensed for use here, in this case, there would be no point because of the wording which was distinctly promotional (as is the text on most 'official' websites - that's what they are for). The existence of other articles doesn't give a right to have one too - please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. To be sure of survival, an article has to show notability - please see WP:GNG as there isn't a specific standard for ballet competitions - and this has to be referenced in reliable independent sources - see WP:RS. Your own site isn't considered reliable (nor would mine be if I were under discussion), nor are blogs, forums or wikis. If you can find the references (no point without them), you could do a new draft at User:Fpetrutiu/DRAFT with NO text that was (or is) on the website, and after you've read WP:NPOV (neutral point of view). Then ask for advice. Most regular editors like SwisterTwister or admins are willing to give advice. Peridon (talk) 09:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough
Thanks for taking a look at the speedy nomination anyway. In truth I hadn't actually noticed the other "half" of the production; my eyes were just immediately drawn to the redlink. I prefer to utilise a low threshold for nominating when I'm going through the new pages though, so that more experienced editors such as yourself can take a look. Thanks for your help. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 13:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

World Ballet Competition
Hello there, Sorry that my first attempt did not meet the requirement of Wiki. Could I please have access to the deleted article to revise it and resubmit it for approval? There are many more ballet competitions listed on wiki and it is a shame that there is no mention of one of the most prestigious one. Anyways, there was no poyright infrigement as I do have the rights to the content, but I will revise it anyways. Thanks a lot for the attention to this matter and I appologize again for the inconvenience. Regards, fpetrutiu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fpetrutiu (talk • contribs) 17:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You don't know our policy and the reason for it. You own the copyright of some text - OK. You post it on Facebook - OK. You post it on MySpace - OK. You post it here - it gets deleted. Why? Because there is no legitimate copying on from those other sites. Here, everything is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA for re-use by anyone anywhere. Even on commercial sites, anything from here can be used. Technically, there has to be an acknowledgement of the source being Wikipedia - some don't do this, but they should. Your text is copyright and it cannot be put on here unless you release the copyright under Creative Commons. It couldn't exist here anyway, as it was far too promotional. I would advise doing what I suggested above - rewriting totally in your userspace. Just click that red link to start the draft. If it's your text, you must have a copy of it even though it's not accessible to me at the WBC website. Probably best to do it from the beginning - 'missions' aren't really encyclopaedic. We prefer facts and good references. By the way, when posting on a talkpage please put four ~ things at the end - this will put your username and the datestamp on - like this: Peridon (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Advice?
I dunno what exactly is happening here, but it seems Aone Beats is not happy with his article and posted a different version on his userpage: User:AONE BEATS. Maybe it's meant to be for temporary testing or something, but I doubt it. I guess I could ask him but he doesn't seem very communicative. So, question: do I nom the userpage for deletion now or later? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Ohh, someone put a speedy on it. Nvm. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't see him being particularly notable anyway - there's a few tags on the original article (never mind him having a tag in his music...). Wait and see, or possibly tag UP as a near duplicate of the original. They're both messy, so there's not much to choose between them. Peridon (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 05:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Ryan Bromley and Ruby (Girl Group)
I had a doubt that can they be A7ed or not?  Yash  t  101   07:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You were right to doubt- but I agree with A7. Ruby had only the claim of one TV show and a forthcoming 'debut'. An artificial group, as many seem to be in Korea, and probably being promoted skilfully. Bromley played (or did something unspecified) with a blue linked band in their live performances, but have did nine others (all unlinked - as are two of the current line-up). Nothing else of significance. I've speedied Ruby on RHaworth's tag, and reverted your reversion on Bromley. Peridon (talk) 10:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you sir! :)  Yash  t  101   11:47, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Escalation?
"Any speedy deletion will be contested and escalated" - might I ask for a clarification of this? Peridon (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The last I checked, no one died and left you in charge of Wikipedia. There most be someone of a higher rank who can overrule your decisions.Wa3frp (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as "rank" on Wikipedia. WP:REFUND exists for specific cases, as does WP:DRV. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 17:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * @BW - I actually declined the speedy in this case, and last I saw of it, the article had been saved (after a bit of pushing...). Peridon (talk) 17:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Re-creating Don Martin Public Affairs (Austin, Texas)
I wish to attempt to re-create this previously-deleted page in a more direct, shorter and very well-referenced manner. Will do so in a sandbox so it can be edited and reviewed by you and others before deciding to move it to article space. Any objections? Comments? Suggestions?  Austex •  Talk  02:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Up to you. Recommended reading: WP:CORP, and WP:RS. If you can't get it to fit CORP, no point in looking for RS. And vice versa. Catch-22. Read WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM as well. Peridon (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)