User talk:Peridon/Archives/2018/July

You are missed
I hope all is well with you Peridon! I wish you the best and wanted you to know that  you are missed here . Sincerely.--John Cline (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Remaking Conejo
the notoriety is such that we're in a better position to judge it.

While most hip hop fans or non Californians may not have heard of the rapper, the impact is quite pronounced in the rap genre. Please do not delete. Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyc media research (talk • contribs) 07:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

your assistance please...
You deleted Runa A. Sandvik after it was tagged with A7, in 2016.

I request you graft the deleted revisions to Runa Sandvik. Geo Swan (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, Geo Swan. Peridon is offline at the moment so I'll handle your request. I took a look at the old article and there was nothing in it of any use to you. I will make a note at Runa Sandvik that this current article is very different from the deleted one and is not eligible for speedy deletion via WP:G4. --MelanieN (talk) 03:10, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Oops - brain fart. It wouldn't have been eligible for G4 anyhow because it was speedy deleted, not deleted per an AfD. Oh well, I'll put the note on the article anyhow. --MelanieN  (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for taking the time to take a look at my request. I think you are overlooking a factor. You wrote that the deleted versions would hold no value to me.  Well, restoring the deleted versions would tell me the identity, or identities, of other contributors who were interested in Sandvik.  2016 was two years ago.  If they weren't competent to write a policy compliant article then, if they were still around, they may have learned enough to be a competent contributor now.  It could be worth discussing Sandvik with them.  So, yes, I would still like to examine the deleted versions.  I think we are agreed that, even if the current article could be considerably expanded, most contributors would agree it measures up to our inclusion criteria.  My interpretation is that this means there is no policy basis for keeping those versions hidden from all but administrators.  Geo Swan (talk) 05:11, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Geo Swan: I can certainly userfy the deleted version to you if you think it might be helpful. Here is is: User:Geo Swan/Runa A. Sandvik. If you can find something usable in it, more power to you. --MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It looks like the page was a copyvio I'm afraid... Adam9007 (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It has now been deleted as such by . Adam9007 (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Thanks, Adam. And Geo, trust me, you aren't missing much - except clear evidence of why it was considered to be advertising. MelanieN alt (talk) 23:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks like it must have been copied from her linkedin page. No wonder it looked like advertising. And you wondered about the person who wrote it, whether you might be able to get them interested in the article: they have not edited here in several years. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 09:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)