User talk:Peridot89

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Just for your reference...
The article was properly sourced this afternoon, neutrally, as I asked. This is why I stressed why proper sourcing was needed before it would be added to the article. As you did not, you lost your editing rights over something that would have been in the article within a matter of days. Hopefully if you decide to come back in six months and are able to use the standard offer, you'll come back ready to collaborate and stop with the soap-eating words towards other editors and admins.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)