User talk:Perl

Dispute resolution
As part of dispute resolution, I am formally requesting that you strike the false information you have posted at Administrators%27 noticeboard/Incidents. If you strike, I will consider the issue closed; if not, further steps in dispute resolution will need to be pursued. You should be aware that you can't just make false statements about someone on Wiki to attempt to discredit them. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 15:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC) Because you responded at AN/I, I responded there. I don't like splitting discussions three ways; I am following your talk page and AN/I. Please feel free to continue dialogue here, once you strike the untruths at An/I. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 17:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be a good start. Guy (Help!) 22:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Alex, while you have not yet responded to my post from yesterday, or stricken the untruthful statements from ANI (and I use that term politely), you have now added a second misstatement (again, I use that term politely) to the ANI. You have continued a campaign of harassment and mistruths about me and have not engaged in discussion about these untruths.  You can dig yourself out of this mess by simply discussing it here on your talk page, as appropriate; I suggest you do that. I specifically did not call for Wrong Planet to be deleted when it came up at AN/I AfD; your statement is again, flatly untrue.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 17:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I am formally asking you, for the last time, to strike the untrue statements from AN/I. I am not a banned WrongPlanet member, and I have not attempted to have the Wrong Planet article AfD'd. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 19:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Sandy, please don't make things up. I didn't say you posted the article to the AfD page or even contributed to the afd discussion. I specifically said "She was adamant in trying to get the article deleted and other wikipedia editors were opposed to doing so for obvious reasons." I said this because you have, in fact, made comments doubting the encyclopedia nature of the Wrong Planet article even though it meets all the requirements according to  Notability. I have been making multiple attempts to work things out with you but you do not even acknowledge how antagonistic you're being towards people on wikipedia. I've searched your name on Google and found other people who described you as a bully. By refusing to show any respect towards me as an editor, I am beginning to come to the same conclusion. I am still offering to strike any comments you don't like if you do the same. Despite the fact that moderators on wrong planet strongly believe you to be the same person we banned, I'm even willing to strike that comment. But you have to also at least acknowledge your role in this conflict. Perl (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Coincidentally, these descriptions of me as a bully originate with your message board and with Zeraeph/mechanima. You've brought off-Wiki unfounded beliefs to Wiki; I strongly encourage you to show some good faith by striking the comments as soon as possible.  I can assure you that showing some good faith towards correcting the untruths about me that have been furthered on your board, and now on Wiki as well, is the most expedient thing you can do at this stage. Whatever your moderators mistakenly believed is not my concern; here on wiki, your beliefs are irrelevant, until you use them to harass another editor, and then they do become relevant. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 20:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sandy, I feel you are harassing me. If you want to take me up on my offer of retraction, that's fine. But I cannot involve myself in this anymore until something is done. Perl (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Perl, Sandy asked me to informally arbitrate this, as I am an outside observer familiar with both parties. I am completely neutral in the fighting going on here. I suggest that both of you just apologize and strike all text that both parties can agree is offensive. It is best we put this behind us and move onto improving Wikipedia, not fighting over an article. We are all Wikipedians here. We should all try to be civil, and it appears to me that in this case both parties have violated the recommendations for civility on Wikipedia. It is best we just move on. -- Shark face  217  02:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I totally agree. If Sandy will agree to this, I'm perfectly OK with doing so. Perl (talk) 03:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WiredCovers.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WiredCovers.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, the image is properly tagged in my view as a non-free magazine cover. The problem is that it still needs a detailed fair use rationale.  See the template Non-free use rationale for what is needed (and see Image:Sodfebruary1977.jpg for a good example).  If you are still having problems, just ask. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Resolving the Wrong Planet dispute at AN/I
Dear Alex—I have been observing the page at AN/I, and am most disturbed by what are clearly false allegations levelled at SandyGeorgia. I must ask you to strike these allegations—you know which ones they are—and explicitly retract them.

I think this would be a productive measure that would allow the issue to move on. May I suggest that we'd all be beneficiaries, including you, the Wrong Planet site, and the Wrong Planet article.

Please take this request seriously. Tony  (talk)  01:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

California photo requests now by County
I saw your name at Wikipedians/Photographers. I just spent the past few days moving all the California photo requests into County categories to make it easier for photographers to locate requests in the locations where they take photos. Please consider monitoring and adding your name to the list at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Los Angeles County, California. GregManninLB (talk) 21:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries to say what you've done
Edit summaries can be informative and save a lot of time when reviewing an article's history - they can can also mislead, or be simply useless. This ("fix refs") is an example of an under-communicative summary. Please take care, especially when removing references from an article, to be clear about what you are doing and why. Speaking as an editor, it helps make wikipedia better for all of us. Thanks... Sheffield Steel talkstalk 23:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Abbas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abbas.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:AlainLeroyLocke.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:AlainLeroyLocke.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:As_201.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:As_201.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Oraclecollier.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oraclecollier.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lgodiva.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lgodiva.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lawr5.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Lawr5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Asperger kl2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asperger kl2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. J Milburn (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Klpnpwhi.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Klpnpwhi.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Mer-b-final-launch.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mer-b-final-launch.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned fair-use image
Hi, File:Raftornadof3b.jpg is nominated for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 09:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Dedekind.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dedekind.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Yerpo Eh? 17:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Rosettiselfportrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rosettiselfportrait.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 05:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:J.m.barrie.200x284.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:J.m.barrie.200x284.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Burton grand.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Burton grand.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:H7g-fowler-plan-small.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:H7g-fowler-plan-small.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:1893-7-tn.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:1893-7-tn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 06:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Europaturmkanzel.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Europaturmkanzel.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File:Uss panay.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uss panay.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File source problem with File:Violin33.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Violin33.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 06:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File:22GordianI.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:22GordianI.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File source problem with File:Ryland13.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ryland13.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Delaroche7.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Delaroche7.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wagrez6.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wagrez6.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Carlson-Chester-F.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Carlson-Chester-F.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Peacocktokyo-natl-museum.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Peacocktokyo-natl-museum.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bancolorwik.png
Thank you for uploading File:Bancolorwik.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Kk277.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kk277.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kk277.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kk277.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 02:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:KaluzamitBartkl.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:KaluzamitBartkl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:KaluzamitBartkl.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:KaluzamitBartkl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:44, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lawr5.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lawr5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ducis.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ducis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:St3153c1.gif
Thank you for uploading File:St3153c1.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 02:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:St3153c1.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St3153c1.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 14:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Niehsnewsfigmollusk.GIF missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Niehsnewsfigmollusk.GIF is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Felixfrankfurter.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Felixfrankfurter.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Cube00 (talk) 10:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your admin status
Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy. You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on miwiki, where you are a bureaucrat and administrator. Since that wiki does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies. If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights. We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard. Best regards, Rschen7754 20:12, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of V.F.D. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article V.F.D. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/V.F.D. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Animalparty-- (talk) 08:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Bots Newsletter, April 2017
Since you've been inactive for a while, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:04, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

V.F.D. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect V.F.D.. Since you had some involvement with the V.F.D. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  N Y  Kevin   02:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

ITN archives
Hi. I hope you are doing well. I am glad to tell you that In the news/Posted/Archives are now fully available, with all the vandalism/disruptive edits removed. While creating the bot for the archival process, I went through a lot of the older posts, you are not only the creator, but one of the editors whose name popped quite often in ITN in "back in the day", so I personally wanted to let you know about the archives I hope you see this message someday. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)