User talk:Permachange549

Tim Kash edits
Please justify your persistent removal of verifiable and accurate references from BBC News, IMDb and the Independent from the Tim Kash article. There are a number of usernames (including yours) who keep reverting to the same version of the article (using colourful, unverifiable language to portray Kash in a good light, with no mention of anything that could be seen as low points in Kash's career, even though they are integral to the article) and whose only activities are to revert the Kash article to the inaccurate and poorly-written version. It could be coincidence, or it could imply that just one person with a vested interest is trying to keep their preferred, if heavily biased, version online.