User talk:Perogrimadi

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nigma Talib, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Nigma Talib. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Perogrimadi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nigma Talib, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) Delta13C, there is no COI with the context. I am discussing details now on the page.Perogrimadi (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Help needed
Although I am a newbie on Wikipedia, I can clearly find User:Delta13C is overtagging a page Nigma Talib knowingly, even there are no such issues, Can someone check his contributions. He seems to be linked with Michael Uzick, check his contribution at Draft:Michael Uzick and attacking the page with a biasness.(refer to the talk page) Please help me to understand if I need to know under Wikipedia editing policies.Perogrimadi (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Samwalton9

I have removed the tags on Nigma Talib. We're supposed to always assume good faith, but Delta13C seems to be trying to start an WP:Edit war and create problems by indiscriminately tagging for issues that are not present. White Arabian mare ( Neigh ) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * If the talk page discussion doesn't suffice, my suggestion would be to pursue dispute resolution. Huon (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Neigh, please check the edit history of the article. I was not indiscriminately tagging, but was restoring tags that were removed from bold action by Perogrimadi. Most of my edits to Talib Nigma were tagging ref-needed and flagging unreliable sources. Delta13C (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Callminer logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Callminer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AccessiBe


A tag has been placed on AccessiBe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 10:03, 17 October 2020 (UTC)