User talk:Perpetualinput

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Scott Nesbitt II (October 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jasper Deng was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Scott Nesbitt II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Scott Nesbitt II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Scott_Nesbitt_II Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jasper_Deng&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Scott_Nesbitt_II reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jasper Deng (talk) 04:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Scott Nesbitt II (October 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jasper Deng was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Scott Nesbitt II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Scott Nesbitt II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Scott_Nesbitt_II Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jasper_Deng&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glenn_Scott_Nesbitt_II reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jasper Deng (talk) 04:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Perpetualinput. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Glenn Scott Nesbitt II, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification
This is my first time volunteering with Wikipedia so I'm a little rough around the edges but with guidance I hope to be a very contributing member. Please anytime I err, please make it known to me so that I may not repeat that same mistake again. I'm here to volunteer to benefit the good that Wikipedia provides to the world. Thank you very much Perpetualinput (talk) 05:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Your recent editing history at User talk:Jasper Deng shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''The four circles' total area isn't the same as the square's, boom end of the story. Please stop harassing me or you will likely be blocked.'' Jasper Deng (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
Account blocked indefinitely. Trolling and harassment. Newyorkbrad (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

If you can show me the math I'll be satisfied
But with out verifiable calculations I'm having a hard time being convinced. Perpetualinput (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)