User talk:PerryPerryD/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, KniteRite, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:KniteRite Studios, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Rename from "KniteRite" to "PerryPerryD"
Rename from "KniteRite" to "PerryPerryD" -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Warlocked
This did not warrant a quick fail. I want a second opinion. GamerPro64 16:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @GamerPro64 The plot and story of this game is not written anywhere on the article, you mentioned a planned sequel with no citations. And the head needs some reorganizing, these are all valid critiques. PerryPerryD (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Additional Note, The screenshot of gameplay is not captioned properly. "gameplay of warlocked" is not a good enough caption. PerryPerryD (talk) 17:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not grounds for a quick fail. You don't know anything about the game. Never review anymore of my articles. GamerPro64  17:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Exactly, I do not know anything about the game, Which means its not understandable to a broad audience. I have provided you reasons on why this article should not be marked as GA and you begin to argue with me. Another editor will review this article. PerryPerryD (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Then how do you know there's a plot and story in the game? GamerPro64  17:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * "Warlocked is a real-time strategy game. Split between two campaigns based on the human and beast factions, the player goes through their campaign to defeat the enemy. " Campaings. Its implied. PerryPerryD (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Campaigns are what you call levels in RTS games. GamerPro64  17:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * In that case ignore my comment on plot. I apologize. However, the sequel, screenshot caption, and the head are all still valid concerns. PerryPerryD (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @GamerPro64 I have edited the talk page section of warlocked and removed the Failure tag and set the article up for 2nd opinion. This means I am setting this article to someone else for review. The decision I made was made professionally, However, because you strongly believe that i made the wrong choice here, I will let someone else decide. Have a good day GamerPro64. And please, try to be calmer. :) PerryPerryD (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Second 'fast' GA decline
I see that for a second time you have 'fast' declined a GA application rather than engaging in a proper GA review process. In this instance, the nominating editor took Warlocked from 3 to 15 refs and 2,262 bytes to 9,000 over a period of more than a year, and deserved more than your instant decision. In both instances, if you had looked at the submitting editors' User pages, you would have seen that they had successfully brought articles to GA status in the past. I strongly recommend that you hold off from any more GA reviews until you have more experience, ideally having yourself submitted and succeeded with a GA nomination. David notMD (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello David. The article was already placed under 2nd opinion after a discussion with the nominator. I would advise that you take a look at my Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle GA Review, As it is not always required to spend an entire week on a single article. PerryPerryD 01:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @David notMD PerryPerryD  01:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You have been on wikipedia far longer than I have. You seem like a wise and knowledgable user. I am not in any way shape or form trying to cause any form of conflict. I simply wanted to inform you about my other GA Nominations and work here. I wish you the best of luck. I denied Warlocked due to issues I had with the article, And I do not believe that a users previous track record makes a difference in this situation. I personally saw issues with the article that as far as I could tell, Did not follow the Manual of Style. I was quick to review this article because it was an incredibly small article in and of itself. I simply wanted to make a professional judgement here. PerryPerryD  02:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario Kart Wii
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mario Kart Wii you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @David Fuchs Hello! I did not expect an Administrator to be doing this review! This is the best possible outcome, because you are the most experienced with the GA and Wikipedia Criteria. PerryPerryD 17:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Admin Help
Hello. I am concerned about user "Wretchskull", More specifically about their comments on [Talk:Autism spectrum], I am not the best when it comes to wikipedia rules, or identifying if something is wrong, however I feel that his comments are a bit harsh and maybe even threatening, I do not know if this is against the rules or not. I simply want to inform an admin that i am concerned about this users actions. I apologize if this is wasting your time. Cheers.
 * Hi, please voice your concerns by talking to directly, and if that doesn't help, by raising specific concerns, not vague accusations, at a central noticeboard such as WP:ANI. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I wasn't threatening anyone or anything, but rather said that trying to merge them would go against WP:MEDRS. However, as I've stated from my final comment here, I have given up trying to maintain the article. Anything I do will be against the majority and my voice doesn't mean anything, so I've unwatchlisted the article and left the discussion completely as it is a waste of time and energy. Wretchskull (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I see, its just that your phrasing and such made me feel concerned about your general attitude of the situation. I apologize PerryPerryD 22:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

(Oinkers42) (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * User:(Oinkers42) Im in.

Courtesy ANI notice
Be advised that opened a thread about you at WP:ANI. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Be advised that I have closed said thread and…let's just say the other user may have dodged a bullet because I handled the report and not admin who's quicker on the block-trigger. —C.Fred (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario Kart Wii
The article Mario Kart Wii you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mario Kart Wii for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * darn PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 20:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KniteRite Studios


A tag has been placed on Draft:KniteRite Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)


 * This, a relic. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 16:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wii U
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wii U you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rlink2 -- Rlink2 (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Wii U
elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wii U
The article Wii U you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Wii U for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rlink2 -- Rlink2 (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Rlink2 Uhh. Bro?? PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 22:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Must be a bug with the bot. I passed it, and the talk page says so: Wii U has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria.. You can add the icon manually Rlink2 (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
~TNT (talk • she/her) 22:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very very much! PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 18:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Realme223
What happened here, I’m curious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realme233 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * what do you mean? PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 19:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @Realme233 I looked at the teahouse, you didnt post anything PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 19:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * User talk:AzaToth HELPCONFUSEDUser talk:AzaToth 2603:6011:4042:2600:7D05:6DC5:D9F9:E447 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ...what? PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 00:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry I just did a weird thing and found a talk history log inside a post from 2005 so I decided I should learn how to code before I find weird things I don’t understand, do you have any general rules for programming I should learn or should I just find the wiki for it? 2603:6011:4042:2600:C822:9B5F:A569:DA97 (talk) 03:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * hello i.p user! I do not have any advice on programming for you at the moment other than to just try, and if it doesnt work, try again. dont be scared of the what ifs. cheers. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 18:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Jedlice, Opole Voivodeship
I reverted the information out as undue, and started a discussion at Talk:Jedlice, Opole Voivodeship. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

ANI
Just a quick fyi to let you know I've closed the ANI discussion you opened. Whatever issues this user had are apparently in the distant past and they were upfront about it. So we are going to cut them some WP:ROPE and see what happens. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

UAA
Hi PerryPerryD, just as an FYI regarding your comment to the user reported at UAA here: there was an edit that the user has made, but it was deleted. In the future, consider reviewing the user talk page to see if there is a deletion notice for any edits, as non-administrators are not able to view the content of deleted edits. Best,  Spencer T• C 00:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Alesbi And Ream
I don't know if this report was intended to cheer us all up. But I had a good old chuckle, anyway. Thanks for making my wiki-day. Shared use, indeed! Nick Moyes (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

...Im DUMB. IM TIRED, AND DUMB. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 05:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * @Nick Moyes PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 05:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)