User talk:Persian Poet Gal/Archive1

Archive 1

(From Tlim7882)
You're good. You keep beating me to reverting articles that have been vandalized, such as John Dalton. Just wanted to tell you how much I appreciate your anti-vandalism efforts, and I want to encourage you to keep up the good work!. Thanks, Tlim7882 01:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah ha ha ha, thanks for the compliments, I'm just a fast typer :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll try to keep it up as best as I can :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

(from 81.79.30.194)
†-†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†

"He has been widely criticized for his gross incompetance during the political and humanitarian disaster that the Iraq war has quickly become. Most embarassingly for the Bush administration, Major General Paul D. Eaton, Major General John Batiste, Lieutenant General Gregory Newbold, General Anthony C. Zinni, Major General John Riggs and Major General Charles H Swanneck have all publically demanded his resignation from office."

This is all true, even from a neutral point of view.

Even the Bush administration has admitted that a change of strategy is needed in Iraq, and the whole global community agrees that it is a humanitarian disaster (600,000+ Iraqis dead) and a political one (the Republicans have not been more unpopular since Nixon and the Watergate scandal). Since Rumsfeld is secretary for defense, he is chiefly responsible for this. As for the list of generals who demanded his resignation, there is not even room for discussion here. It was reported by every major media group and is not a matter of opinion.

†-†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–† —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.79.30.194 (talk)
 * Thank you for signing my talk page this time. I prefer this kind of discussion here.
 * Response: Your statements about the matter are presented way more intelligently this time. Your views do have backing but you must realize it has nill place on an NPOV (Neutral Point of View) encyclopedia website.  Next time rather than editing the article search for places of discussion on Google where you can state your views without consequences in an open forum.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  20:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

†-†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†

You fail to realise that what annoyed me in the first place was that you decribed my contribution as "vandalism". If you had just put "biased" or swomething I would not have thought you to be some kind of retard and would not have bothered chasing it up.

†-†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–†–† —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.30.194 (talk • contribs)
 * Sheesh just be kind about things people. My apologies for any hard feelings but next time realize your approach.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

(from 4.156.99.105)
Hello,

I'm really sorry about that...I was only accurately stating what Tony Montana said during that scene in question. I didn't realize that this was vandalism...forgive me :( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.156.99.105 (talk • contribs).
 * No problem. Glad to see someone is responsible on Wikipedia.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  04:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know, adding or  to a page is only a means for an admin to notify users that a page is protected. This does not actually confer protection to the article. If you need help protecting a page, please contact an admin or request it. Thanks! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, I just recently have become more active and am trying to help along in the small ways I can :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  22:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've noticed you on RC patrol, and thanks for helping out! Feel free to contact me if you find yourself in a situation needing another pair of eyes or if you run into a crafty vandal or whatnot. And sorry about not observing the format of your talk page – I just used the "+" button blindly (not to mention the implications of a message subject like "Protecting Saddam Hussein", in retrospect, which should probably be changed in the code of the template I used for that, which is ). Thanks again and happy editing! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for the bugs, but here's just one more thing: would you please consider adding "subst:" to the beginnings of your templates? It's a warnings standard here that saves server bandwidth and processing power. I wasn't sure if you were aware of that function or not; WP:UTM is another cool page for patrollers to check out if you're interested and haven't seen it before.

That's my last message for now. Keep up the good work! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yet again you provided me with another kernal of knowledge, thanks :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  00:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

"User" 24.60.119.106
I noticed your recent note on this "user's" talk page. They have received numerous "last" warnings. How many before this IP is permanantly blocked? The IP seems to exist solely for vandalism, with no good edits whatsoever. Thank you for reading. -- Weirdoactor 20:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

rv vandalism
Glad to help out! Mar de Sin  Speak up!  22:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Wow thanks! My first barnstar, how sweet of you :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  23:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

(from 24.15.236.140)
Sorry,Neo here again. Can you reverse the change I made on "2006"? The NASA statement for October 24th is not back, my edit is still there. I'm not sure how to reverse and I may mess up even more. =/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.15.236.140 (talk)
 * Don't worry taken care of. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  03:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar! Michaelbusch 03:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You deserve it :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  03:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

And another thanks from me too. You're doing great. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As I said to Michael, you also deserve it Blnguyen :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  04:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

(from Jinxtengu2)
You represent gross incompetence in maintaining the wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jinxtengu2 (talk • contribs).
 * Why not contribute some valid criticism next time hmmm? ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 06:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Prussian..
Hi. I've blocked the account indefinitely. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * God bless, and thanks. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 07:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Goodnight
Goodnight. The vandal seems to have stopped for now and I need to get some rest. Happy Wikibirthday (only a 2 days late). JoshuaZ 07:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

NOT Goodnight
Hi just wondering what makes my criticism invalad? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.37.160.224 (talk • contribs)
 * The fact that you are repeatedly vandalizing my page. That's why.  I would suggest you quit now.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 08:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

What people consider "vandalism" is entirely subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.38.140.127 (talk • contribs)

Re: A User Has Been Consistently Harassing Me
Gotcha. I'll keep an eye on your talk history. Can sprotect your user page if they keep hitting it. Luna Santin 09:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the valiant efforts, thanks. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 09:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay; sprotection is in place. :) Luna Santin 19:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I cannot say thank you enough to you people :P. So once again thanks.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalizer Seems To Quit to No Avail
''A vandalizer has consistently attacked both my user page and left comments on my talk page since last night. They had spoofed my account twice. Luna was monitoring it last night but they sneaked in another episode while I and Luna were gone, take a look at the history. I appreciate any help thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)''
 * It sounds like Luna has offered to sprotect your user page for you. It sounds like you should accept the offer!  :)  —Wknight94 (talk) 16:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you kindly, I'm just not the type to jump to these kind of things :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

He he, welcome to being a vandal fighter, Persian. My user page has been vandalized 25 times, and would have been more if it weren't sprotected. That's in the space of less than 2 months. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 17:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * My, my I never knew the club was so huge :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 17:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Which club? Do you mean this club? Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 17:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well those that patrol and end up getting their pages vandalized, that club :P. Thanks for the cheerful words, they gave me quite a chuckle.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 17:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Try an RCP tool?
Just wondering: have you considered using an automated tool for vandalism patrol? I'd say you have a good enough track record and more than enough edits to successfully apply to use one. You might like it, as it does make vandalism patrol quite a bit easier. One caveat, and then a tip: you probably won't be able to use automatically. Still, programs like (and most popularly) VandalProof are somewhat standard for frequent recent changes patrollers because they make it a lot less painful to do for extended periods. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Why thanks for the suggestion. I had not pursued it yet because I did not think myself qualified enough to use them yet :).  I will consider applying to use Vandal Proof.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 17:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I blocked the banana vandal - hope this hasn't cut across you, jimfbleak 18:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks much obliged. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 18:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked vandal
Your pesky IP out of Canberra has been blocked for a week. If the little noodge comes back after that time and starts in again, I've got your back. I'll block him again for much longer. It hadn't occured to me that the "user name" was a variation on your own or I would have blocked him rather than just warned him. Thanks for looking to me for help. I appreciate it greatly. :) Best, Lucky 6.9 19:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Once again, thank you, thank you, thank you :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

IP vandal is at the AIV
Hello Persian Poet Gal, I see that you warned User talk:137.122.93.225 many times for vandalising the Iraq article and now he/she has vandalised past your last warning and now is at the WP:AIV. Just thought you would like to know.P.S are you a poet in real life?-- S e  adog  19:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Great effort, I'm taking a break for now but thanks for informing me about that! And yes I am a poet in real life :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, I love poetry.-- S e  adog  19:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

An award for you!

 * My God you people are too KIND ^_^! Thank you!  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Adminship
Would you consider running for adminsip at some point? JoshuaZ 20:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * To clarify, you don't have quite enough experience yet but you are definitely headed on the right track. JoshuaZ 20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As you said yourself I don't know if I'm qualified :P?! I would definitely like to help Wikipedia for the better, but honestly I would feel crass trying to run for it myself.  However if someone believes in my abilities, by all means I accept their offer when I'm a little less wet behind the ears.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Goodnes gracious, I know she's a good editor, but she's been substantially editing for three days now. No offense, but editors like MER-C have been doing this for months, and still didn't make it. Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 20:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I have to admit I quite agree with Pat's thoughts :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 20:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you so much for the unexpected barnstar. :-) Here's a cookie for you, they're always yummier as the Winter approaches. Kindest regards.-- Hús ö  nd 21:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * All I can say is: :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 21:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Doesn't know a thing
Does not even know when the PS3 comes out, and reverts any changes from the correct date, to the wrong date. Please check sources, and use Wikipedia correctly next time. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blobzorz (talk • contribs)
 * I'm what you call an RC Patroler. I make sure people do not vandalize information on pages like the PS3.  So understand the issue of incorrect revert, ok.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 03:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so much!!
Hey there Persian Poet Gal, thanks so much for the barnstar!! And thanks also for giving a more precise answer at HD... I have seen you making lots of anti vandal reverts and I was wondering if we have the same articles watchlisted. But upon reading your page, I realise that you are all over Wikipedia. Great show!! -- Lost (talk) 18:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I believe you greatly deserved recognition for your quick tips and helpful hints for lots of the new users :). Lol, as far as being all over Wikipedia, I just try to get around!  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

My query about nomination for peer review on my pic?
hey on the general wikipedia help desk you responded to my msg about how to nominate a pic for a peer review. Is there any chance that you could nominate for me, i dont know how! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahadland1234 (talk • contribs)
 * Lol, you can nominate your pic yourself, just follow the instructions on the page. I'll get back to you when I have more time and walk you through it :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I would LOVE to help, but...
Take a look here. I was the main moderator that took care of all the user requests. However I changed my username (from GIen --> Glen S) and it screwed up my moderator access. I havent been able to help since! AmiDaniel has been busy at university, and as yet there's little I can do. Sorry! Gl e n 01:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, I really appreciate the response. I'll remain patient :P.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for your welcome.I would like to ask you something.

Shouldn`t it be mentioned that Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic studied in Konstanz university?

(on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstanz)

But,Im not sure how to put it,in "history" or where? Can you please put it for me,because Im also not sure how to formulate it.

Thank you very much

YXYX 01:45, 3 November 2006 (UTC)!
 * I'm glad to see your up and going already as far as editing Wikipedia :). To your question regarding the Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic page: I personally am not the authority to ask, try the discussion page where those actively editing the page can tell you where to place the edit.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 01:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Lol,shh,its not my first time on Wikipedia,but I got blocked(but dont tell)because this time Im going to behave...Thats a promise lol,anyways,this time I just registered to do few changes,but I dont wanna go and change something and then get in the problems like last time,so I decided to ask before I do anything this time :)

Thanks anyway

YXYX 01:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear you are on the road to legitamate editing :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Persian Poet Gal! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Finally I can use a proper RC tool :P. Thanks.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 17:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for supporting my recent RfA. If I can ever be of any help to you, ranging from admin tasks to copyediting, just ask. Cheers.  young  american (ahoy hoy) 19:45, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm glad a user like yourself was made an admin :). Thanks for the offer of help.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Belated thanks
For the barnstar. Took me a while to get around to thanking people... -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 06:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Any thanks is a nice kind of thing to hear :). Your welcome Pat!  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 21:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Returning the favor
Thanks for the barnstar. You have been a very big help on the Esperanza fire article and throughout the encyclopedia, so I award you this, partially to retur the favor, but also because you deserve this award as much as anyone:
 * Thank you very kindly I did not expect that! I believe Wikipedia is very lucky to have editors similar to yourself :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

vandalizm
sorry bout that i wasnt sure of exactly wat that would do if i wouldve know it was vandalizm i wouldnt have done it i heard from a friend that it was like a chat board to edit and that its reseted every hour so i guess i got some bad info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.170.47 (talk • contribs)
 * As long as you do not continue to blank articles then there is no problem, but if you go off and repeat this kind of editing I or others may alert admins. Be highly cautious when editing Wikipedia.  Thank you.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 04:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey
So you're the person who keeps beating me to reverts. *glares angrily* :p Just kidding. I've seen you around, doing good work, so I just thought I'd pop in to say howdy, and keep it up. riana_dzasta 06:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the hello! I will try my best to keep up in the fight against revert bea- I mean vandalism :P.  Thanks again.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Warning template
Concerning this monstrosity: someone pointed out to me the template. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 02:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will keep that template in mind. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 02:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

That wasn't vandalism! We really *don't* respect them ;)
Yes, the subject is a joke. I'd like to ask you to pretty-pretty-please un-revert a change to the TSC article on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tech_Support_Comedy&diff=next&oldid=86824358). The edit in question was *not* vandalism, it was meant to clarify the fact that the term "starfish" is used exclusively to refer to the annoying and the stupid and *not* to end-users in general. Also, as a matter of personal taste, I do believe that the sentence reads rather better when started with, "The dullest of end users," rather than just, "End users." Thanks in advance (or if you're going to disagree with me here then, uh, go in peace, I guess.) 82.69.51.59 00:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Richard B
 * Re-edit the article, I will let other vandal fighters decide. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 00:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Article re-edited.Veinor (ヴエノル) 00:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Good idea. Do you think I'd have a better chance of getting my edits accepted (particularly stylistic edits) if I carefully wrote them into iambic pentameter, please? (oops, sorry, forgot to sign) 82.69.51.59 00:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Richard B
 * As I said, I will allow other vandal fighters to decide. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 00:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Ooookies, thank you. If I ever bump into you in real life, remind me that I owe you a beer-soaked cookie. Have fun! IProcrastrinate ThereforeISlobOut 00:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Richard B

RfA thanks
Oh, look. This comes with a bonus! I decided to take the chance to award you some recognition. :-) Kindest regards.-- Hús ö  nd 21:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate my unique Husond vandal/poetry star :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Semi protected your page
Hi Persian Poet Gal, I have semi protected your page. You seem to attract a lot of vandals! Do let me know when you want it unprotected -- Lost (talk) 05:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * For heaven's sake, someone with a lot of socks really has it out for you. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 08:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow! Seems like I missed a whole vandalism hootenanny last night :P!  No worries guys, the saying applies "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never harm them."  Reminds me of grade school.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." At least that's the way I learned it. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 19:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well thanks Mr. I-know-old-sayings-better-than-you-do :P! Just kidding, really I cannot thank you guys enough.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you have any idea who it was? I'm going to place a sockpuppet tag on the article, but I'd like to know who the puppetmaster was. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 19:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The only clue I have gathered is any user with the reference to "Jinx" in their name or comments has an undying vendetta against me. No matter, life goes on, I'm generally no worse for wear :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

 * Yay Clomes! Congrats on the adminship!  You've definitely earned it.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Lol
Yes, its Monday morning here (New Zealand) and I think perhaps I am doing my best to avoid actually working... but that last IP wasnt me!! Hope your weekend's going well too!  Glen  22:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, I figured something fishy was going on... ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks from AuburnPilot
Thanks for taking the time to honor me with the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. As my second, it is very much appreciated and I will try to live up to the credibility and hardwork of its namesake. Thanks again, -- AuburnPilot talk 17:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your welcome Auburn, keep up the excellent work :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Dalbury's RfA
My RfA passed with a tally of 71/1/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. --  Donald Albury  02:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Congrats Dalbury :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

VP
See Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * that list is the VP 1.2.2 list and those list do nothing for access to VP. the actual list are encripted and stored else where. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I guess I will wait for the update and see what happens. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar!
Thank you for the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! It came as a nice surprise. Happy editing and cleaning up vandalism. Cheers! Siba 10:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your welcome Siba! It was surely long overdue for a vandal fighter like yourself :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 14:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Great Work
Great work on tagging new articles for speedy deletion! Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Chris, I commend you for your excellent work as well :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Which edit are you talking about? I'm not a new member, and I haven't vandalized Wikipedia. Could you please be more specific instead of just using a template?

--PEAR 23:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I could have been mistaken (my apologies if I was), it was a recent edit to George H. W. Bush. By the way no need to call someone an idiot in an edit summary.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough.
I just wanted to verify whether it was procedure or not. Like I said, nobody'd said anything about it before now and I've been here a few months. HalfShadow 01:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem! I know what its like to be on the other end of the "you-know-about-subst-don't-you?" messages before :P.  Mostly those who advised me to use it did so very kindly.  Just keep up the good work.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 01:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Digital Opportunity Index (DOI) AfD
The "non-notable business" that you thought was behind the Digital Opportunity Index (DOI) article turns out to be the International Telecommunications Union, an agency of the UN, which is both notable and not a business. I've rewritten the article to make this more clear, and I've added information about the index to the ITU article, and I'm suggesting merge or keep. I invite you to reconsider your vote. cheers --Xtifr tälk 11:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Though it's notability is now established, I support the new vote to Merge the article with ITU. Thank you however, for alerting me with this important update.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting...
vandalism to my user page! (ESkog)(Talk) 19:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem ESkog. Hope you don't get struck again any time soon.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

 * All I did was type a short comment for gosh sakes :P?! Thanks anyway.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 02:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's not the length, but the words that count. --evrik (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that's very kind :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

barnstar
I absolutely agree with you, and I apologise if I appear to have taken your comments personally. I am just frustrated, as I have explained on the barnstar page, at being accused of attacking other people when I am not. I won't say anything else on the matter, as I've said my piece on the barnstar page, and I would every much like to stop saying my piece there, because its distracting from actual discussion on the barnstar, but I hope you can understand that when someone falsely accuses me of being irrational, biased, and taking criticism of the barnstar personally, I feel obliged to defend myself. Could you possibly have a few words with Badbilltucker and persuade him to stop harrassing me on the page? Its doing neither of us, and certainly not the proposal, any good. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah I figured that might have upset you. I understand that you feel you should act on it but really let Badbilltucker say his piece, he might feel offended if I accuse him of harrassing as he has accused you.  I believe that the whole group of you in the LGBT barnstar discussion have good intentions.  People are just a bit brash in expressing them is all.  As I said, give it some time to mature on the page.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 20:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Mehmet Öz
Hi PPG, thanks again for the barnstar. I was taking a peak at some of your contributions, and noticed Mehmet Öz. I'm familiar with Michael Roizen, who cowrote some books with Oz. When I checked to see if there was an article about Roizen, I noticed that there is a duplicate article about Mehmet Öz at Mehmet Öz. I'm thinking that your contributions should be merged to that article (since titles such as "Doctor" aren't typically included in an article title (see Manual_of_Style_%28biographies%29), though it is common to have a title lik Dr. Mehmet Oz redirect to the main article. Once again, keep up the great work! OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reminding me about that! I meant to tag the article that the poster brought up.  I will add a merge tag to the one I created.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

User Block Needed
I saw that you had posted a vandalism warning to Priapus891. He needs to be blocked indefinitely on the basis of an objectionable user name. In case you were not aware of it, "Priapus" means penis. •DanMS 07:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No I'm definitely aware of that (yes I'm a teenager who reads ironically), I was keeping close watch on the Aaron Carter article to make sure they aren't trying to stir up more of their vandalism spree before I report him. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 07:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the revert. Very quick! :) Bubba hotep 16:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem Bubba hotep! ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Teh Barnstarness
Thanks. ^___^ -WarthogDemon 19:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Awww love the long anime smilie :P. Your welcome, keep up the excellent work.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Persian Poet Gal! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hopefully this will amend my user login problem :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Protection
Hi PPG, would you like your page unprotected? Its generally better to unprotect after some time so that channels of communication are more open... Let me know.. -- Lost (talk) 04:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure Lost, you have my go ahead to unprotect the talk page. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 04:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Done.. Cheers... -- Lost (talk) 04:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

(from 24.17.201.161)
sorrry!!! me and my friends new already it would not save so we were just playing!!!! Sooory!! about that please dont block this site from us! , we use it every now and then.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.201.161 (talk • contribs)
 * Playing was not exactly what I would call it. I am not an administrator, I am merely a vandal fighter.  Just learn to edit Wikipedia in a beneficial manner please.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 04:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

(from Jimfbleak)
Done jimfbleak 06:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey
"This user is a fan of USC, both football wise and cinema school wise."

Looks like we have something in common. Two things if you count RC patrol. =) —Lantoka ( talk 11:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sweet another USC fan :). I'm currently sending in the applications.  I really am passionate about movie making and hope I can make it into their school of cinema.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 18:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That's awesome! I'm not a cinema major or anything, but I hear our cinema school is really good. I guess that goes both ways for you: it's great if you get in, but it makes it that much harder to do. =P It recently got a big endowment, too... the school got renamed and everything. The campus is absolutely beautiful, and the tuition is absolutely killer. Maybe you can get some scholarships. ;) —Lantoka ( talk 19:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes I'll just keep my fingers crossed for the scholarships :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 19:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

protected again
Heh, the unprotect didnt last long. I have protected again. Cheers -- Lost (talk) 14:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That's the price a vandal patroller pays I guess, no matter...moving on. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 18:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Wildlife Barnstar
Persian Poet Gal, Traditionally wildlife includes plants and animals, not just animals. See Wildlife. KP Botany 22:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is why I also proposed habitats which sort of refers to plants as well. Feel free to make the comment on the proposal page, but for now I'm keeping the proposal the same so as not to keep changing it rapidly without those involved knowing.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Would You Take a Look at This Please....
I have blocked both of the users (the diff links you provided), keep me posted if there are anymore out there. --03:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, sad that this is the way someone likes to spend their time rather than doing something more productive. I just revert it, report it, and that's that.  Nothing more and nothing less.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 03:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Talk page
Well, you ve already taken the necessary steps so don't worry. There are quite a few people (included me) watching your page now, I reckon. -- Lost (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I appreciate that, thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

November 22
Hi! Just a small heads-up. With a heavily vandalized article (which November 22 will be today), it's a good idea to check for multiple vandalisms, like this. Two IPs vandalized it a few minutes apart, so the revert only removed one of them. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Lol, I thought I caught most of it. I see I missed an edit that added "pwnz0red".  Sure, I'll screen the edit history more closely to make sure that future reverts remove all of the nonsense.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Eric stimson and Riley lauer
Heya, I saw you added the db-nonsense tag to the above articles (beat me to it!), but didn't seem to warn the users about it. When patrolling newly created pages, please always remember to place an appropriate warning tag on the creator's talk page when it's clear that they are a new user; optionally, you can also add welcome to soften the blow.

The reason for this is simply that many speedy-able new pages are created by people experimenting with Wikipedia, so finding their creation tagged for speedy deletion or simply gone can be a nasty introduction to the website. To avoid implicitly biting the newbies, its best to first welcome them, and then explain that they shouldn't create useless pages using a tag like Test1article. I hope you agree with me on this. :)

Cheers, Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 22:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, I usually always use the t-templates when on vandal patrol. I will also start using them for the new page edits.  Thanks for the advice.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, no problem, I'm glad you agreed. On a related note, you totally just beat me to warning User:Justme2626. :P Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 22:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ^_^ you probably are beating me to tagging an article right now (due to me being distracted by this message). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Done :-) --Golden Wattle talk 23:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was surprised with how long it remained up :P.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks For The Revert :)
Can I ask a favor? This user here: insists that this external link is important, and when I try to revert, he leaves personal attacks on my talk page and puts it back. Can you figure this out? -WarthogDemon 23:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The link to begin with is from YouTube. There is a policy that limits YouTube links (WP:EL).  I reverted to the version without the link.  No problem about the revert on your page by the way :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I did notice it was from YouTube which is why I saw it as linkspam in the first place. And when the user started to cool down slightly, I was wondering if perhaps the link was legit.  Thus I asked you to check. ^_^; Thanks for the help and also for the revert. :) -WarthogDemon 23:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As I said above, no problem. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you! -- ProveIt (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your welcome! Alot of the time large amounts of categorization efforts go unnoticed.  You definitely deserve more of 'em in my opinion.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar?!
Thank you! I was trying to talk in IRC and the screaming from my VandalFighter distracted me so I went to battle. *huggles* -- Elar  a  girl  Talk 01:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You go girl :P! ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 01:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * MY GOD! Elaragirl, I'm not worthy :P?!  That is extremely kind, thank you very much.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 02:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Say hi to that sign for me...
USC Film School fan, eh? ... If you happen to pass the old "Abandon Reality All Ye Who Enter Here" sign at USC Film School, tell it "Bwana" says hello. ;) ~D BS Talk/ Contribs 03:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Lol, if all goes well I shall do that for you. I got to tour the facilities yesterday.  The Lucas editing labs were sweet.  Lucky Trojans.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar!

 * I very much appreciate that Jamie. Thank you very much, I really am humbled by these barnstars.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

No idea
I have no idea how I stumbled across your comment, but it was nice to hear someone as passionate as you applying to USC. I hope ya get in and thought, as a former student there, you might want to see this. I know of a lot of people who went through the film school, so just letting ya know you have a resource in me if need be. Take care. Roguegeek (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, amazing how many Trojan fans that have been connecting together this past week :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 05:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Not to dissuade y'all, but when I was in town, UCLA had the better film school (in certain ways). There used to be only 16 slots for Production that 3000+ applied for as USC. So if you don't get in (perish the thought), consider UCLA as a backup plan. Great school, cheaper university, too. ;) (off the soapbox) ~D BS Talk/ Contribs 15:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Zoroastrianism
May be might be interested in helping WikiProject Zoroastrianism--D-Boy 17:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

A Personal Attack...
''I think you should see this diff. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)''
 * Sorry you had to see that. That account has been blocked indefinitely.  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, thank you very much for taking care of that. Just keep wary of the personal attacks he has been consistently issuing.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 21:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Thx for catching my user page vandalism
Thanks for catching (and reverting) the vandalism to my user page! I've been enjoying vandal patrolling, but its not without its occasional drawbacks. :-)

-Quintote 23:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem Quintote :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 23:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Designing a Barnstar
I just wanted to ask, is there a programme for designing Barnstars? The one i have used for the Discussion Award was using Publisher and Paint. I was referered to you by KP Botany btw. Simply south 22:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I personally am a big fan of good old Adobe Photoshop. I use Adobe Photoshop Creative Suite however, any standard version of the program should give you enough to work with.  Unfortunately there is no official program built for designing barnstars :P and lack of a good photoeditor hinders some of the freedom you can create with the design.  If you type photoshop tutorials on Google you can get some pretty good advice on certain techniques that can make a constructive design.  Try to construct a good concept first.  Once you have a good idea you have more to work from.  For example with the Wildlife Barnstar I first thought up various animal prints to use.  Then from there I made the star look less "cut and paste" by making the prints beveled and added a transparent beveled spoke in the middle.  Mixing and matching these techniques adds a bit more realism to your star.  If you have any other questions feel free to ask me.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 02:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Do you think my design is any good?

Simply south 10:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I think its a start, but rather than a phone representing Wikipedia discussion how about a talk bubble or a head that's speaking next to the star? ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 16:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I think i'll keep it but put another design up as well. So sort of like you suggested. Simply south

I've tried a second design and loaded it but now i think it look worse.

. Simply south 17:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes the first one is still a better design. Why not go a bit more simplistic if you are going to use the talking head idea, such as a silhouette?  ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, i've gone back to the first suggestion but based it a little bit more on other barnstars of similar design. I hope i am being more realistic.

Also, sorry to clutter your talk page with images.



Do you think this one is better? Simply south 16:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, that design looks way better than your second try. I think the only thing that needs work is maybe changing some of the colors around.  However at this point I think its safe to post that design yourself on the proposal page and begin to get the opinions of others.  Its always better to design it to cohere with more than one opinion ;).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Also see User talk:Badbilltucker. Simply south 18:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar!
Very much appreciated! :) Gzkn 06:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your welcome :)! ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 06:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dr. Oz.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dr. Oz.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes that image is now obsolete (there is an alternative image used now), its ok if it is deleted. ¤~Persian Poet Gal  (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Unprotect
Done &mdash; Lost (talk) 02:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks as always Lost. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 03:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

(from 58.179.137.180)
when you receive the title of God, please let me know, until then please do not play the role of the 'great and powerful one', by ordering me around and telling me what to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.137.180 (talk • contribs)
 * I do not imply that I am powerful nor do I want to be. I issued you a standard t-template vandal warning.  It would be wise if you follow the suggestion of the templates and discontinue to vandalize.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 05:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
谢谢! (If your computer won't read that, it's "xiexie", Chinese for "thank you".) I appreciate your giving me that barnstar. It can be thankless work, opposing those vandals, but it's worth it for the good of 'Kipedia. I notice that we end up finding the same vandal edits and racing to revert them... :-) You've done great in stopping vandals too, so keep it up! Heimstern Läufer 07:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, its a pleasure cleaning up vandalism with you :). ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 07:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Stop censoring my edits
Stop censoring my edits. Why are you and others entitled to delete/revert/etc? My edits were valid and honest and supperted by fact, yet you've instantly deleted simply based on your own whim. It's ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremyrharrington (talk • contribs)


 * Anyone is entitled to remove vandalism or personal attacks on Wikipedia. You placed your comments on his user page.  Simply place them on his talk page (in a civil manner), that's all.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, will do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremyrharrington (talk • contribs)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! &mdash;The Gr e at Llamamoo? 15:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem Llama. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 17:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Why don't you take notice of other people comments?
I’ve noticed you’ve received a number of comments for new but well-intentioned users, why don't you listen to them instead of abusing your powers by reverting on every little whim. Couldn’t you simply keep what they have said? It’s people like you who help vandals by choosing to keep only a few opinions and views present in the wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JEENSK (talk • contribs)


 * If you read Wikipedia policy you will notice a line that says No personal attacks. In that policy it is said that it is considered acceptable to remove personal attacks.  Promoting people to leave constructive comments on talk pages is actually way more productive than to allow them to continue to harass users.  And also, I would appreciate if you had actually left your comment with your own account other than a one-use-only-account.  However, one thing I admire is that you presented your views very respectfully.  As you see I have not deleted your comment because it was constructive and not a personal attack.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 03:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

usaman2 replying:
sorry about the signing thing.it's just when i first got here it said to sign my name when i do an edit or something,i forgot what it said so i just sighned everything i did!sorry again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usaman2 (talk • contribs)


 * No problem Usaman2 :P, its a mistake that could happen to anyone. Trust me my first week of Wikipedia was none-to-pretty but I got on by and have learned thanks to the advice of many kind Wikipedians.  Keep contributing, enjoy the site :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 03:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Please help me with wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adopter (talk • contribs)


 * Well Adopter, I would first suggest that you do not vandalize user pages as according to your contribs. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Back to the Future timeline
Hi. I happened to notice via my watchlist that you reverted an IP's correction to an error in grammar and punctuation, which he or she has now reinstated. I don't know whether you came to any accommodation with the person, but the IP edit should stand. Regards and thanks! Karen | Talk | contribs 05:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes that was an RC mistake, the edit is fine to stand, thanks for catching that. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 06:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Got 'em both
; ) Glen  09:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks much appreciated. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

(from Menonthemove)
Why is my men on the move article being deleted. I followed the same structure as altas and belkin, etc. I thought I did a good job and wasn't advertising or anything. Please let me know

TY Menonthemove 20:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Christian


 * Sure, the reason why it is still being considered for deletion because there are some notability issues. If you check Notability (companies and corporations), the company may not meet some of the requirements.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 20:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

This is some history about the moving company in the moving category... I am not advertising or doing any wrong I believe. {subst:nn-warn|MEN ON THE MOVE}} Menonthemove 20:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Do not worry, the article's content is up to standard now, however I am concerned with its notability issues as I mentioned above. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Scaretree
Done. Khoikhoi 21:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Lol, warned. The next time he does it, I'm gonna use my blocking powers. ;-) Khoikhoi 21:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked! Khoikhoi 21:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Poetry
Wow, I love your poems! Have you ever considered trying to get a poetry book published? (Your username would make a good pen name, I think!) :) -- Gray Porpoise Your wish is my command! 22:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What a lovely compliment! I mostly write poetry because I love the freedom of it.  Maybe one day I'll hit the shelves with a poetry book or two :P.  Again, thanks that was really sweet.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The Christmas poems seem especially meaningful, but they're all lovely. It appears that your editing skills are just as good as your talent for writing poetry. -- Gray Porpoise Your wish is my command! 22:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 27th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Daniel james bell
Thanks for spotting the recreation of Daniel james bell. I've deleted the article and left a stern message on the IP's talk page. All the best, Gwernol 01:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem Gwernol, if I spot it again I'll give you a hollar ;). ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Adminship
Hello Persian Poet Gal. I was wondering if you have intentions of becoming an admin, coz you've been doing such a remarkable job on Wikipedia. I was very surprised when I checked your edit count and discovered that you've been an active contributor only since last month! Great job alright... When you feel ready for adminship, I'll be happy to nominate you (if you'd like to become an admin, that is. oh and if you wouldn't mind having your RfA stained with my nomination heh). :-) Regards.-- Hús ö  nd 03:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If I'm ever nominated with an RfA I would never feel that it would be stained by you Husound! That is really an amazing compliment that I'm not sure I fully deserve :).  I recently have started to experiment with Wikipedia in a more deeper sense and have found to enjoy it.  As far as wanting to be an admin, it would be a great honor and I would gratefully accept the nomination if the community feels I deserve it ^_^.  Again, thanks.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 03:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, whacking vandals is too much fun. Well, if you keep up your outstanding work, I'm sure that you could attempt an RfA in January or February. I antecipate a resounding support from the community and I'd be honored to nominate you. Just let me know when you feel that time has come. :-) Regards.-- Hús ö  nd 03:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Vandal whacking is not exactly my initial idea of fun but I guess fun these days is open to interpretation :P. Thanks again, your compliments made my day.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 03:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd support such a nomination - I'd even co-nom :) You would be a great admin. riana_dzasta 03:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I would most certainly support, too! I was suprised to find out that you're not one already! -- Gray Porpoise Your wish is my command! 11:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Inappropriate editing...
''Hello Wknight94, I was recently scrolling down recent changes and caught sight of this user page. Apparently NandT and some friends of his are using their edits merely for socializing which violates WP:NOT. Could you take a look at it please? Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)''
 * Thanks for letting me know. I've blanked the pages and asked them to stop (somewhat nicely this time).  —Wknight94 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As long as his page does not become MySpace that's just fine :P. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay
Sorry for the inconvieninece i may have caused, I did not realize. Anyways, I'm glad you made the correction. Keep up the good work :) Money disney 03:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries Money disney, was an easy mistake to make, I found out just a few days ago about the newer article so that's why I had to revert to the previous version. Thanks for the compliment by the way :).  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

(from User:Winston 29, but in reality User:Andrew Winston)
Persian Poet Gal, I wish to inquire why you construe User:Andrew Winston's page as a form of vandalism. I do not see why he should be blocked or threatened to be blocked as a user. He has as much right as any person to use wikipedia, and his page is virtually unknown. But i think it would be good for you to get into contact with him and advise him on what to do.

From, Disgruntled user —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Winston (talk • contribs)


 * I was unaware that your IP address was making edits. The kind of content you were adding at first seemed very much attacking the page.  I revert personal attacks to user pages quite often.  Looking at the edit history I realize that your IP often edits your page.  Just realize that I was mostly looking out to protect your page.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 06:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Persian Poet Gal, Thank you for your understanding. I would like to know if I continue editing user:andrew winston, will i be blocked for it? I would also like to know out of curiosity the process of becoming an administrator on wikipedia. Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Winston (talk • contribs)


 * I am not an administrator myself, I'm pretty much a Recent Changes Patroller, I watch out for vandalism. As far as being blocked, I cannot say.  If other users feel your edits appear as vandalism they might report it themselves to administrators.  Lastly, becoming an admin requires that you or someone you know submits a Request for Adminship on the RfA page.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 07:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

XAMM
The XAMM logo entry shouldn't be reverted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.247.193 (talk • contribs)


 * First off, adding the creation of a logo to an article about November 28 is not considered an important enough event to add. Second, its ghits do not indicate a notable resource.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

sorry
a stupid friend of mine got onto my computer and started doing all this stuff i see it's all fixed, thank you

Tyreek207.96.47.130 07:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem, as long as your following edits are productive there is nothing to worry about. ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 07:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Nonsense article...
I dunno, that looks like pretty serious academic stuff. You should read over WP:DELETE and consider or the AfD process.

...okay, so it's totally deleted. Cheers! Luna Santin 08:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes I'm so uninformed with today's hotbead of academia and serious knowledge :P, thanks Luna. When a nonsense article remains still up after 20 minutes or so it seems like a tad long.  Once again, thanks!  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Manson Iowa article vandalism
I see the article for Manson, Iowa is vandalized again but you have been keeping after it. As I am a newbie to Wikipedia I didn't know whether I should alert a more experienced user or just deal with it myself. If it's the same person they probably need a ban. Ethbin 15:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for keeping watch, you can always revert vandalism if you ever see it with a few simple steps (check my "How to Guide to Wikipedia" on my user page ;)). If the same vandals continue to attack the article then I'm sure an admin will take care of it.  I'll keep tabs on the article for awhile and if the vandalism continues I'll request semi-protection for it, that should help quite a bit.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal   (talk) 16:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)