User talk:Pervaiz1987

Speedy deletion nomination of Pervaiz Moiz
Hello Pervaiz1987,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pervaiz Moiz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pervaiz Moiz


A tag has been placed on Pervaiz Moiz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 07:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Pervaiz Moiz. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Pervaiz Moiz.  smt cha hal  (talk) 07:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pervaiz Moiz
Hello Pervaiz1987,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pervaiz Moiz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)