User talk:Pesci~enwiki

Editing Concerns

 * 1) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kukini 18:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Please do not blank notices on your user talk page. This is considered vandalism in wikipedia. Kukini 18:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Kukini 18:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Kukini 19:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing  because of . Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. M a rtinp23 19:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Not vandalism
I have been unfairly accused of vandalism for trying to remove an overly long "Welcome" message from my own talk page! According to Vandalism, Deleting the comments of other users from Talk pages other than your own, aside from removing internal spam, vandalism, etc. is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where this policy does not itself prohibit the removal and archival of comments at the user's discretion. This invalidates the claim by User:Kukini "Please do not blank notices on your user talk page. This is considered vandalism in wikipedia", which is incorrect.


 * Pesci 19:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * OK - I'm going to unblock you, based on your email to me, and the fact that it was probably a mistake that when removing the welcome message, you also removed one warning. Please be more careful, and never remove warnings.  Thanks M a rtinp23 21:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify matters, deleting notices on your talk page is NOT the same as archiving. Nothing I posted above would qualify as a "personal attack" either. The blanking of notices on one's talk page, as was done numerous times by this user was not appropriate. My first notice was based on the blanking of a huge swath in a separate article, where there was inconclusive discussion on the user talk page. Kukini 21:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, absolutely correct - never remove notices without linking to where you've placed them. Also, you removal of content from Baylor University is considered disruptive, and can lead to a block.  M a rtinp23 22:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Once again...please do not blank your user talk page. Kukini 06:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Pesci, removing notices is an unacceptable response to warnings in Wikipedia. Best to address Kukini's warnings rather than defend yourself over the talk page blankings. -- Electric Eye  ( talk ) 11:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If you continue, you may be blocked for distruption. M a rtinp23 11:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Warning Removal
Your talk page is intended to serve as a place to discuss your contributions. It ends up being a sort of a history of the work you've done and the conflicts you've been in, or the praise you've recieved. It's alright to archive comments or warnings, but blanking it is not considered acceptable, as it is not yours. Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:TALK. Please continue to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, and please don't continue to blank other users' comments. -Kukini 17:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Pesci. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Pesci~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)